1/128
for fbla
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
risk
uncertainty, no idea what will happen for sure
includes losses for individuals and businesses
reduction in value, ex. money
pure risk
losses can be known with certainty
NO uncertainty
loss is still present; no uncertainty about the loss
risk does not equal loss!
probability
probability is the number of how likely the event is likely to occur
ranges from 0%-100%
risk does not equal the probability of a loss
types of risk (1)
pure vs. speculative
types of risk (2)
static vs dynamic
types of risk (3)
diversifiable vs. non-diversifiable
types of risk (4)
objective vs subjective
pure vs speculative risk
both involve uncertainty
difference is the outcome
pure risk
2 future outcomes: loss or no loss
associated losses are typically insurable
speculative risk
3 future outcomes: loss, gain, no gain or loss
basis for enterprise resource management
businesses/organizations face more speculative risk than pure risk
many speculative risks are not able to be insured; ones that are will be difficult/expensive
static risk
does not change significantly over time
risk is always present for organizations, society, and individuals
dynamic risk
arises out of changing circumstances
diversifiable risk
not highly coordinated
random; not dependent on other factors
impacts only some individuals/businesses/groups
non-diversifiable risk
highly correlated
simultaneous occurrence of loss from a single event
impacts large segments of society at once
subjective risk
an individual view on uncertainty/situation involving risk
depends on the individual
not easily measured/not easy to compare
influences how firms/decision makers handle risky situations
expected loss
based on experience, data, or other means (what we expect to happen)
actual loss
losses that actively occur
factors affecting risk
peril, frequency, severity, hazard
peril
the immediate cause of the loss
frequency
how often do the losses occur?
# of losses in a given period of time
cannot be negative
what is the likelihood of loss?
low frequency losses - low probability loss
high frequency losses - high probability loss
severity
how bad a loss is in $$ terms
severity is conditional upon frequency being positive
if frequency is 0, severity is not an issue
hazard
underlying condition behind a loss occurrence
either increases frequency, increases severity, or increases both
three types of hazards
physical, moral, and morale
physical hazard
1) location
if peril is flood, living at the shore is a physical hazard
2) construction
fire peril, wood structure is a hazard
3) use
fire peril, use of a building as a church is a hazard
moral hazard
behaving differently because of insurance
frequency/severity increases because of insurance
ex: insurance fraud, arson, etc.
common thread: presence of insurance, change in moral behavior
fixed prices lowers user cost
lower price, increased demand
costly activity
morale hazard
carelessness concerning losses
has nothing to do with the existence of insurance
decision-making process
manage pure (TRM) and speculative (ERM) risk
goal for TRM is to minimize financial impact
goal for ERM is to maximize shareholder value
risk management in an organization
originally specialized area of finance
1) finance department (small)
2) risk manager (medium)
3) chief risk officer (large)
continuously evolving
not only insurance buying
evolution of risk management
1950's- no such thing as risk, just bought insurance. very narrow and nonstrategic
60’s - professor wayne snider at temple helps coin term risk management and it becomes a strategy
present - very important function & broad
steps in the risk management process
Identification of exposures to loss
Evaluate exposures to loss
Identify possible alternatives
Select among the alternatives
Implementation of the chosen options
Re-evaluate periodically the chosen strategies
objective risk
measurable variation in uncertain outcomes based on facts/data
variation of actual from expected outcomes
more variation means more risk
if you have 2 identical firms but one firm faces more risk than the other, which one has more value?
the firm with the least risk
implication is that risk creates an economic burden
concept: risk is "costly"
does risk cost an organization?
how does that impact society?
how does it impact the organization?
expected cost of loss
money that comes from losses
ex: - death of a family member - loss of financial support
cost of hospital stay/healthcare services
income lost from businesses
cost of manage/risk management expenditures
money spent to prevent the loss
ex: - PPE equipment - mask
money spent to make places safe; bulletproof glass, outdoor heating, etc.
money spent on vaccines such as research and development
damage to society/loss of goods or services b/c of risk
deemed “too risky”
society loses valuable
people lose their jobs
economy suffer, high unemployment
can't do things you enjoy doing - eating out, travel, see loved ones, etc.
traditional risk management (TRM) loss exposures
property losses
net income
personnel
liability
property loss exposure
loss ownership of financial/physical assets
theft/damage
direct losses
cost of replacing the asset
cost of repair
legal interest
financial interest or stake in the property
if there is a loss to the property, you also suffer a loss
situations giving rise to interest in property
ownership interest
secured creditors
buyers and sellers interest
bailee interest
tenant interest
leasehold interest
ownership interest
most common types of interest
can have present or future ownership interest (future ex: when you have a car loan or mortgage)
secured creditors
the bank or lender when you take a loan for a house
they actually hold title - i.e they hold title - your ownership interest is future
buyers and sellers
shipping products
bailee interest
a bailee is an entity who receives property from another for a business purpose
a bailor is the owner of the property
interest for the bailee is a legal liability to return or cost to replace the property - if something happens before returning it to the bailor
tennant interest
continued use interest
for a specific period of time
for a specific purpose
for a specific rental rate
responsibility to return property in reasonable condition
may have leasehold interest
leasehold interest
ex) - 10 yr property lease
$1000/month
yr 5, fair market value of rent is $1500
fire destroys the building
tenant leasehold interest they hold
leasehold interest exists for tenant if the fair market value is more than rent
net income loss exposures
AKA business interruption
net income = revenue - expenses
a firm suffers a primary (usually property) - as a result suffers a secondary loss that results in indirect expenses
indirect losses: extra expenses, loss of income
normal procedures of a business are interrupted
decrease in revenue
increase in expenses
impacts bottom line (net income)
events causing net income losses
damage to property owned by the firm
delivery truck is stolen (property loss)
extra costs
rent another truck causing an increase in expenses
ordered are not filled causing a decrease in revenue
damage to property owned by others
key supplier has a property loss
unable to produce goods causing a decrease in revenue
power or telephone outage
could causes a decrease in revenue
personnel loss exposures
risk that organization will suffer losses due to key employees suffering a loss
employee suffers illness, death, disability, retirement, resignation, etc.
for the employees suffering loss - human capital risk
employee benefits and personal finance issues
due to loss of key employee - the firm may also suffer: revenue decrease, sales are down, decisions are not made, expenses increase, cost of replacing the person
personal issue becomes a business issue for employer negligence and legal liability
wealth losses from liability exposure
money loss from being sued
legal fees
bad behavior or breaking a contract can lead to a lawsuit
behavior commonly classified as either:
intentional (assault, libel, slander)
unintentional (negligence or carelessness)
legal liability is established when:
there was negligence
there was actual damage/loss
what constitutes negligence
failure of a person to exercise the proper degree of care
burden of proof is on the injured party
absolute/strict liability
L.L. is established because accidents happen
imposed whether anyone was at fault
situations w/ children, workers compensation
measurement issue
usually easy to establish injury or damage occurred
establishing the amount of damage is usually difficult
measurement of losses
property losses
relatively simple to calculate
bodily injury (BI)
special damages
compensate for measurable losses
medical expenses
loss of income
moderately difficult to calculate
measuring bodily injury damages
general damages
compensate for intangible losses
pain and suffering
mental anguish
difficult to measure/estimate punitive damages
amounts assessed as a form of punishment
gross negligence is involved
very difficult to estimate and measure
defenses to liability
assumption of risk defense (by injured party)
one recognizes the dangers involved in an activity
voluntarily chooses to encounter if:
attending a hockey game
going skydiving
comparative/contributory negligence
plaintiff was partially to blame for what happened
res ipsa loquitur
not strict liability
"the thing speaks for itself" - a modification to a law of negligence
presumption of negligence on part of defendant
requirements:
normally would not occur unless negligence
defendant exclusively controls the tools/equipment
injured party does not contribute to loss
ex: dentist removes the wrong tooth
vicarious liability
one person becomes L.L. for the negligent behavior of another
employees are held responsible for actions of their employees acting within the capacity of employees
joint and several liability
negligence of two or more parties contributes to the injury or damage
injured parry may recover the entire amount of compensation from any negligent party who is able to pay - regardless of the degree of the party's negligence
“search for deep pockets”
product liability
manufacturers of a faulty product that injures someone or damages property may be held L.L.
negligence
product is negligently made or improperly designed
proper warning is not given to the consumer
product liability losses
cost of defending and paying claims for injury
cost of recalling any batches of products that are suspected of being defective
damage to your name
premises liability
owner or tenant may be held liable for damages if someone is injured
if the property of others is damaged as a result of a condition in or arising out of the premises
trespasser
someone who comes without right and consent - only obligated to abstain from doing intentional harm
licensee
comes onto property with knowledge of owner
no purpose of or benefit to owner
must warn of any hidden danger
social guests/invitee
been invited for some purpose
customer in store
must keep premises safe so no harm comes
liquor liability
businesses that manufacture, sell, and serve alcohol
injuries resulting to patrons/guests from selling alcohol
DRAM shop laws- can hold businesses liable if they overserve someone and they subsequently leave and injure someone
30 states have DRAM shop
rest have social host liability, where it typically only resides with the serving of someone who is underage
animal liability
exotic animal
strict liability
dogs
some states have strict liability
some states - if dog never bit before, could escape liability
traditional risk management
4 loss exposures (property, net income, personnel, liability)
silo approach
focus on mostly insurable risks
silos
property/liability pure risk (hazard risk) - risk manager
personnel risk - human resources
operation risks - COO/business units
financial risk - CFO
strategic risk - CEO/board of directors
enterprise risk management
manage risk and seize opportunity
risk-based approach to managing an enterprise
very strategic, holistic, scientific approach
breaks down into 4 quadrants of risk
#1 - hazard risks
fire/floods - property
issues w/ key employees - personnel
lawsuits - liability
net income losses
typically pure risks
#2 - financial risks
inflation
foreign exchange rates/currency
stock market
interest rates
volatility
liquidity
credit
debt rating
most are speculative risks, not net income losses
#3 - operational risks (risks that arise out of business operations) *combination of pure/speculative risks
manufacturing products
supply chain issues
service provider failures
system failures
products retail
regulatory issues
employment practices/company policies and procedures
discrimination
workplace violence/sexual harassment
strategic/business risk (SWOT)
customer service issues
public relations
reputation
competition
bad business decisions
intellectual property
ethics
union issues
typically, speculative risks
TRM
TRM has silo/departmentalized approach
TRM focuses mainly on hazard type risks (flood, fire, etc)
handled by risk management area
financial type risks handled by CFO, finance, or accounting
other risks maybe handled by their specific areas
not much effort to make relative comparisons among various risks to understand the cumulative impact on a firm
ERM
has an integrated approach
occurs at an enterprise level instead of individual departments
risk management activities heavily impact business decisions
designed to facilitate comparison and evaluation
identify risks and determine if risks are correlated or independent
CRO - chief risk officer
change business strategy
seize opportunities
CRO is critical
how to identify exposures - 1
inspections of plant/facility/location - "walk-arounds"
how to identify exposures - 2
contract analysis
leases
hold harmless agreements
how to identify exposures - 3
look at past info
doesn’t work in all situations
doesn’t work w/ dynamic risk
how to identify exposures - 4
share loss information with similar organizations
how to identify exposures - 5
safety checklist from insurance companies
how to identify exposures - 6
flow chart approach
how to identify exposures - 7
ask employees/managers in the firm
how to identify exposures - 8
financial statement approach
balance
assets
physical-building
non-physical - trademark, patent, copyright, goodwill
liabilities
who owes us money? can they pay?
income statement
sources of revenues
where does it come from?
budget
measure and evaluate exposures to loss
step 2 in the risk management process
measure
probability of a loss (frequency)
$$ amount of losses that do occur (severity)
expected outcomes/loss = EL = E(F)*E(S)
total $ of losses in given time period (frequency and severity - expected loss)
risk
uncertainty
variation around expected losses vs actual
statistical probability
make estimates based on statistics
look at past data and estimate or run an experiment and use results from the collected data
law of large numbers
law of large numbers
overtime the more data you collect or more observations that occur- your results will get closer to the accurate result
random variables
- outcome depends on some chance event
the results are random
the rolling dice (1 out of 6)
coin flip (heads or tails)
car accidents
property fires
expected outcome
the core of risk management decision making
uses of expected outcome
serves as a basis for for enterprise risk management decisions and insurance company pricing decisions
gross premium
premium paid per unit of coverage to insure a particular risk
price for product
price should be sufficient to cover all costs
insurer does not know all the costs until final insurance claim is settled
3 components of gross premium
pure premium + risk charge + administrative costs
pure premium
portion of the gross premium calculated as being sufficient to pay for losses only (expected outcome)
expected outcome must be estimated in advance
estimate of EO may be wrong
actual losses may not be equal to expected outcome
actual loss = expected loss
break even
actual loss < expected loss
profit
actual loss > expected loss
loss
risk charge
reflects the estimation risk of the insurer
extra amount charged by the insurer to represent the estimation risk
insurers use past information to predict the future