1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Is crime a normal part of society?
Point: Crime is normal and necessary
Evidence: Durkheim (1895) – crime exists in all societies
Explain: Crime creates boundary maintenance + social cohesion + change
Critique: Too much crime → anomie (breakdown of norms)
Why do people commit crime in unequal societies?
Point: Crime results from strain between goals and means
Evidence: Merton (1938) – innovation = crime (e.g. fraud, drug dealing)
Explain: People want success but lack legitimate opportunities
Critique: Doesn’t explain why not everyone commits crime
Is crime caused by inequality and power? (Conflict theory)
Point: Crime reflects material inequality + power struggles
Evidence: Martin Luther King Jr. – “riot is the language of the unheard”
Explain: Marginalised groups may use crime as resistance
Critique: Overly focuses on inequality, ignores individual choice
Why do working-class youths form deviant groups?
Point: Crime comes from status frustration
Evidence: Cohen (1955) – working-class boys reject middle-class values
Explain: Form subcultures that invert norms (e.g. vandalism)
Critique: Paul Willis (1977) – crime may be for “fun,” not frustration
Is crime socially constructed?
Point: No act is inherently deviant — it depends on labelling
Evidence: Becker (1963) – Outsiders
Explain: Society creates deviance by labelling “outsiders”
Critique: Doesn’t explain why primary deviance happens
How does labelling lead to more crime?
Point: Labelling leads to secondary deviance
Evidence: Lemert (1972) – primary → secondary deviance
Explain: Label becomes master status, reinforcing crime
Critique: Deterministic — not everyone accepts labels
Why do some people NOT commit crime?
Point: Crime occurs when social bonds weaken
Evidence: Hirschi (1969) – attachment, commitment, involvement, belief
Explain: Strong social ties prevent deviance
Critique: Doesn’t explain crimes by well-integrated individuals
Is crime a rational decision?
Point: Crime is a cost-benefit calculation
Evidence: Becker (1968), Ehrlich (1973)
Explain: People weigh risk vs reward
Critique: Ignores emotions + social context
Does situational prevention reduce crime?
Point: Crime can be reduced by limiting opportunities
Evidence: Clarke (1997) – target hardening, surveillance
Explain: Makes crime harder, riskier, less rewarding
Critique: Displacement — crime may move elsewhere
Why is crime data unreliable?
Point: Crime is underreported and socially shaped
Evidence: Only 43% of crime reported (BCS 2009–10)
Explain: Hidden crimes (abuse, domestic violence)
Critique: Victim surveys also have limitations
How does policing affect crime reporting?
Point: Police behaviour affects trust + reporting
Evidence: Desmond et al. (2016) – 22,200 fewer 911 calls after police violence
Explain: Misconduct reduces civic engagement
Critique: Context-specific (US case)
How do gender and crime relate?
Point: Gender shapes crime patterns
Evidence: Frances Heidensohn (1985) – women controlled more → less crime
Explain: Social control limits female offending
Critique: Freda Adler (1975) – liberation thesis
How does ethnicity affect crime patterns?
Point: Crime reflects structural inequality + bias
Evidence:
Black people up to 29× more likely to be stopped (EHRC)
Higher custody rates (Hood, 1992)
Explain: Over-policing + systemic bias
Critique: Doesn’t fully explain offending rates
Does prison reduce crime?
Point: Prisons may increase deviance
Evidence: Goffman (1961) – “mortification of the self”
Explain: Identity stripped → reinforces criminal identity
Critique: Some argue prisons deter crime
Are alternatives to prison more effective?
Point: Restorative justice may reduce reoffending
Evidence: UK RCT – 27% reduction in reoffending
Explain: Focus on repairing harm
Critique: Limited availability (<1% access)