Final Exam LEQ 2022
Mary Astell
Women needed higher education
Equality in marriage
Mary Wollstonecraft
Founder of modern European feminism
Pointed out the arbitrariness of men over women in society
women should have equal rights
Marie-Thérèse de Geoffrin
Owner of a popular salon
Jean - Jaques Rousseau
Viewed women as "naturally different” from men
Believed women belonged in a domestic role
Male and female roles could never overlap
Women should not be allowed in politics
Querelles des femmes
Women portrayed as
inherently base
prone to vice
easily swayed
“sexually insatiable”
Men believed women needed to be controlled
Science was used to support old views
Women’s larger hips meant their role was to childbaer
Smaller skulls meant smaller brains
Women throughout history have often been ignored and pushed away from participating in new movements in Europe, given the role of housewives and little more. Throughout the scientific revolution, women were excluded from things such as scientific academies and scientific conversations. Despite this, said women continued to push and learn further past those boundaries. Women such as Maria Sibylla Merian withdrew from society to further research her causes.
As the scientific revolution came to a close, it opened the door for what was later known as the enlightenment, a movement of intellectuals who advocated for the use of reason, natural law, hope, and progress. Enlightenment thinkers such as Mary Astell, Mary Wollstonecraft, and Marie-Thérèse de Geoffrin pushed against social norms to be participants in the Enlightenment by writing about, speaking about, and standing for what they believed in, much like the female thinkers of the scientific revolution before them. Despite their work and dedication, these women were still the discussion of criticism from men such as Jean-Jaques Rousseau, who believed many things along with the idea that male and female roles could never overlap, as well as things such as the Querelles des femmes which attempted to prove that women were inherently inferior to men simply based on anatomy.
Supported
Serfdom abolished
The fall of the Bastille
King could no longer enforce his will
August 4, 1789
Elimination of the old regime
Monarchy abolished
Vendee revolt
Law of 14 Frimaire
De-Christianization dampened
Thermidorean reaction
churches reopened for worship
Constitution of 1795
national legislative assembly
Violated
Reign of Terror
De-christianization
Supported
Doubling the third
The decleration of right of man and citizen
end of exemptations from tax
freedom of men’s rights
freedom of speech and press
outlaw of arbitrary arrests
Reign of terror
everyone targeted
Violated
Three estates still drastically divided
Third estate was give no voice in parliament
Voting by estate
Difference between active and passive citizens
only active could vote
Women clubs outlawed
women no longer allowed a voice
1802
reenstatement of slavery in French west Indian colonies
Suppported
National assembly swore to meet until constitution formed
Violated
Pleas of help ignored by monarchs
Flight of Varennes
King shattered illusion of loyalty to subjects
Committe of public safety turned against radical supporters
executed leaders of pairs commune
turned into docile tool
Political standings before the Glorious and French revolutions were rooted in absolutism. In Britain, King James II ruled with absolute power and tried to take away power from Parliament. He elevated Catholics to high standings in government and focused his efforts on the Catholic Church to separate himself from parliament further. In France, King Louis XVI was following Absolutism. He ruled based on heredity and did not listen to his people when they were starving, and instead spent his riches on himself and his wife. Both kings only cared about the upper-class nobility and ignored the lower classes, who were the majority of the population. This sparked the need for a revolution in both places.
The Glorious Revolution and the French Revolution were both consequences of similar governing styles and led to their own political consequences to varying extents. The French Revolution led to the creation of multiple French Constitutions and Napoleon’s civil code. In contrast, the Glorious Revolution led to the creation of the Bill of rights, there was a difference in violent activity, and the Glorious Revolution ended with two monarchs. In contrast, the French Revolution led to one.
Bill of rights vs Napoleonic code and french constitutions
glorious - bill of rights paved the path for constitutional monarchy
French - kind of made tyranny
Violent activity differences
glorious - few, relate to how it was named the glorious revolution. Easy for William and Mary to interfere bc of permission
french- Many people were murdered, most without reason. Radical phase
Number of monarchs (how they ruled compared to the other)
glorious - two, worked with parliament
french - one, more like a tyrant
The French Revolution wanted a government by the people, for the people. This was seen in the motto, “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity.” The revolution focused on the individualism of every person. One of the main goals of the revolution was for the lower classes to have a say in government. They did not have the same value as upper-class citizens and could not express themselves the same way. The Old Regime was abolished during the French Revolution. This made people equal and took away the estates.
When Napoleon came to power he adhered to the enlightened ideals when it benefitted him. When it was good for him. He made the lycée system his civil code adhered to equality among men, and was tolerant of religions. When being enlightened hindered his power the Coup d’etat happened, he reinstituted slavery, and
School
Civil codes
Tolerant of religion?
Coup d’etat, Napoleon created a new constitution and republic, started napoleon’s dictatorship
Put executive power in hands of three consuls, first consul’s (napoleon) decision was final
Controlled many important aspects of gov. Bureaucracy, legislature, army
Reinstituted slavery
Mary Astell
Women needed higher education
Equality in marriage
Mary Wollstonecraft
Founder of modern European feminism
Pointed out the arbitrariness of men over women in society
women should have equal rights
Marie-Thérèse de Geoffrin
Owner of a popular salon
Jean - Jaques Rousseau
Viewed women as "naturally different” from men
Believed women belonged in a domestic role
Male and female roles could never overlap
Women should not be allowed in politics
Querelles des femmes
Women portrayed as
inherently base
prone to vice
easily swayed
“sexually insatiable”
Men believed women needed to be controlled
Science was used to support old views
Women’s larger hips meant their role was to childbaer
Smaller skulls meant smaller brains
Women throughout history have often been ignored and pushed away from participating in new movements in Europe, given the role of housewives and little more. Throughout the scientific revolution, women were excluded from things such as scientific academies and scientific conversations. Despite this, said women continued to push and learn further past those boundaries. Women such as Maria Sibylla Merian withdrew from society to further research her causes.
As the scientific revolution came to a close, it opened the door for what was later known as the enlightenment, a movement of intellectuals who advocated for the use of reason, natural law, hope, and progress. Enlightenment thinkers such as Mary Astell, Mary Wollstonecraft, and Marie-Thérèse de Geoffrin pushed against social norms to be participants in the Enlightenment by writing about, speaking about, and standing for what they believed in, much like the female thinkers of the scientific revolution before them. Despite their work and dedication, these women were still the discussion of criticism from men such as Jean-Jaques Rousseau, who believed many things along with the idea that male and female roles could never overlap, as well as things such as the Querelles des femmes which attempted to prove that women were inherently inferior to men simply based on anatomy.
Supported
Serfdom abolished
The fall of the Bastille
King could no longer enforce his will
August 4, 1789
Elimination of the old regime
Monarchy abolished
Vendee revolt
Law of 14 Frimaire
De-Christianization dampened
Thermidorean reaction
churches reopened for worship
Constitution of 1795
national legislative assembly
Violated
Reign of Terror
De-christianization
Supported
Doubling the third
The decleration of right of man and citizen
end of exemptations from tax
freedom of men’s rights
freedom of speech and press
outlaw of arbitrary arrests
Reign of terror
everyone targeted
Violated
Three estates still drastically divided
Third estate was give no voice in parliament
Voting by estate
Difference between active and passive citizens
only active could vote
Women clubs outlawed
women no longer allowed a voice
1802
reenstatement of slavery in French west Indian colonies
Suppported
National assembly swore to meet until constitution formed
Violated
Pleas of help ignored by monarchs
Flight of Varennes
King shattered illusion of loyalty to subjects
Committe of public safety turned against radical supporters
executed leaders of pairs commune
turned into docile tool
Political standings before the Glorious and French revolutions were rooted in absolutism. In Britain, King James II ruled with absolute power and tried to take away power from Parliament. He elevated Catholics to high standings in government and focused his efforts on the Catholic Church to separate himself from parliament further. In France, King Louis XVI was following Absolutism. He ruled based on heredity and did not listen to his people when they were starving, and instead spent his riches on himself and his wife. Both kings only cared about the upper-class nobility and ignored the lower classes, who were the majority of the population. This sparked the need for a revolution in both places.
The Glorious Revolution and the French Revolution were both consequences of similar governing styles and led to their own political consequences to varying extents. The French Revolution led to the creation of multiple French Constitutions and Napoleon’s civil code. In contrast, the Glorious Revolution led to the creation of the Bill of rights, there was a difference in violent activity, and the Glorious Revolution ended with two monarchs. In contrast, the French Revolution led to one.
Bill of rights vs Napoleonic code and french constitutions
glorious - bill of rights paved the path for constitutional monarchy
French - kind of made tyranny
Violent activity differences
glorious - few, relate to how it was named the glorious revolution. Easy for William and Mary to interfere bc of permission
french- Many people were murdered, most without reason. Radical phase
Number of monarchs (how they ruled compared to the other)
glorious - two, worked with parliament
french - one, more like a tyrant
The French Revolution wanted a government by the people, for the people. This was seen in the motto, “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity.” The revolution focused on the individualism of every person. One of the main goals of the revolution was for the lower classes to have a say in government. They did not have the same value as upper-class citizens and could not express themselves the same way. The Old Regime was abolished during the French Revolution. This made people equal and took away the estates.
When Napoleon came to power he adhered to the enlightened ideals when it benefitted him. When it was good for him. He made the lycée system his civil code adhered to equality among men, and was tolerant of religions. When being enlightened hindered his power the Coup d’etat happened, he reinstituted slavery, and
School
Civil codes
Tolerant of religion?
Coup d’etat, Napoleon created a new constitution and republic, started napoleon’s dictatorship
Put executive power in hands of three consuls, first consul’s (napoleon) decision was final
Controlled many important aspects of gov. Bureaucracy, legislature, army
Reinstituted slavery