Legal Studies Unit 1: Proving Guilty

studied byStudied by 4 people
5.0(1)
Get a hint
Hint

Criminal Law

1 / 67

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.

68 Terms

1

Criminal Law

is an area of law that defines behaviours and conduct that are prohibited (i.e. crimes) and outlines sanctions (i.e. penalties) for people who commit them.

New cards
2

Crime

A crime is an act (i.e. undertaking an action) or omission (i.e. failing to undertake an action) that is against an existing law, harmful to an individual and to society, and punishable by law (by the state).

New cards
3

Sanction

is a penalty(eg a fine or prison sentence) imposed by a court on a person guilty of criminal offence.

New cards
4

Defining a crime

Act or an Ommission

New cards
5

An “act”

Committed by doing something

New cards
6

An “ommission

Committed by not doing something

New cards
7

Examples of an “act”

Criminal offences, murder, Theft

New cards
8

Examples of an “ommission”

Watching someone drown, being a bystander to a murder

New cards
9

For something to be a crime, it must be

Against an existing law, harmful to an individual or society and punishable by law

New cards
10

4 purposes of Criminal Law

Protect individuals, protect property, protect society, promote justice

New cards
11

protect individuals

aims to protect indivduals by establishing crimes and processes to deal with those who commit crimes

New cards
12

protect property

Criminal law exists to protect both public & provate property + land and enviroment

New cards
13

protect society

Criminal law sets standars of expected and accepted behaviour accordingly to the community & the legal system

New cards
14

promote justice

processes to deal with offenders & to enforce the law, preventing the need to take itinto their own hands

New cards
15

presumption of innocence

Is the right of the accussed of a crime to be pressumed not guilty unless they are proven otherwise

New cards
16

Doli Incapax

“incapable of evil”

New cards
17

mens rea

“A guilty mind”, mental element of a crime, guilty mind

New cards
18

Actus reus

“A wrongful/guilty act” physical element of the crime, the guilty act

New cards
19

For something to be a crime, it must be…

Against an existing law, harmful to an individual or society and punishable by law

New cards
20

Against an existing law

A law stating that an act or ommission is illegal, it cannot be an abrogated law.

New cards
21

harmful to an individual or society

Crimes may harm victims or society as a whole

New cards
22

punishable by law

The Victoria police are the main body that can enforce the law

New cards
23

protect individuals examples

Murder, Rape, Arson

New cards
24

protect property examples

Offence to tresspass, or steal another persons property

New cards
25

protect society examples

Laws prohibiting drug offences & terrorism offences

New cards
26

promote justice examples

laws

New cards
27

Actus Rea examples

stalking or theft

New cards
28

Mens Rea examples

Prosecution must must prove that the person intentionally or knowingly committed the crime-e

New cards
29

They are pressumed innocent until they are……..

proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt

New cards
30

They must be treated as if they were…….

innocent

New cards
31

Beyond reasonable doubt

is the standard to which an adjudicator or jury must be sure that the accussed is not guilty, must have enough evidence to find them guilty without reasonable doubt

New cards
32

Does the accused have to prove their innocence?

nope

New cards
33

Where does the burden of proof fall on?

on the prosecution or state

New cards
34

is it the responsibility of the state to prove that the accussed is guilty?

yes

New cards
35

right to silence

the accused may choose to stay silent and make the prosecution do all the work.

New cards
36

What might the accused do to prove their guilt?

The accused might choose to provide evidence to the meaning of their guilt, such as an alibi

New cards
37

Some words to describe mens rea are:

intentionally, knowingly, maliciously, recklessly, negligently and willingfully

New cards
38

Several circumstances that a mens rea is not possible is:

If you accidently injure someone during an epileptic seizure

if your below a certain age when the act happened

New cards
39

strict liability crimes

Crimes that dont have a mental element, thye only require the actus reus to be found guilty.

New cards
40

Do all crimes require actus reus and mens rea

nope

New cards
41

Summary offences

Are MINOR crimes heard and determined in the magistrates court by a magistrate, most crimes in Victoria are summary offences

New cards
42

“Case being heard summarily”

It is heard without a jury, they are determined by a magistrate that decides the sanction

New cards
43

examples of summary offences

road traffic offences, minor ssaults, property damage

New cards
44

Indictable offences

are SERIOUS crimes generally heard and determined by a higher court ( county, supreme) before a jury or a judge.

New cards
45

If the accussed pleads not guilty….. (inictible offences)

the matter goes to trial and it will be heard by a judge and a jury which the jury determines the verdict

New cards
46

if found guilty the judge determines a……

sanction

New cards
47

examples of indictable offences

Murder, rape, assault, manslaughter, threaten to kill and theft

New cards
48

Indictable offences heard summarily

allows only some indictable offences to be heard summarily (in the magistrates without a jury) these are less serious indictable offences and the verdict lies with the magistrate

New cards
49

Does the court have to agree that a indictable offence is heard summarily

does the accused have to agree that it be heard summarily?

yes they must agree

yes

New cards
50

examples of indictable offences that are heard summarily

Retail theft, property damage and burgulary under $100,000

New cards
51

Assault

the intentional or reckless use of force or the threat of force against another person without lawful excuse

New cards
52

3 elements of assault

The accussed applied force or threatened to apply force

application or threat of force was intentional or reckless

no lawful justification or excuse

New cards
53

Murder

Is the unlawful & intentional killing of a human being by a person who acted voluntarily & without any lawful justification

New cards
54

3 features of Murder

Killing was unlawful

Accused acts were voluntary

Accused acted with intent to kill or cause serious harm

New cards
55

Killing was unlawful

Prosecution must prove the accused did not have legal justification (or did) for causing another persons death

New cards
56

accused’s acts were voluntary

The prosecution must prove the accused committed the acts when they were awake, aware & in control of their bodily actions

New cards
57

accused acted with intent to kill or cause serious harm

The prosecution must prove the accused acted with a guilty mind

The prosecution also must prove that they had the intention to kill or seriously injure them & knew that it would cause probable death or seriously hurt them.

New cards
58

Murder example

Hannah McGuire was found on Friday morning in a car set alight near State Forest Road in Scarsdale, about 25 kilometres south-west of Ballarat. Hannah McGuire, 23, who was found dead in Scarsdale on April 5. The accused is a 21yr old male who had bail charges linked to robbery. The accussed is Hannah McGuires ex partner.

New cards
59

Defences to Murder

Self Defence-the accused must believe their actions were necessary to protect themselves.

Mental impairment

intoxication

New cards
60

Impacts of Murder

The victim

the community

the offender

New cards
61

The accused applied force, or threatened to apply force

  • can be physical force

  • can be threat of force

  • does not need to be violent

New cards
62

The application or threat of force was intentional or reckless

The accused intended to cause discomfort or damage, or acted knowing their actions would cause harm or damage

New cards
63

No lawful justification or excuse

The accused did not have legal right to assault the person, or did so beyond their authorisation

New cards
64

defences to assault

Self Defence

Intoxication

Accident

New cards
65

Self Defence

Believed their actions were necessary to protect or defend themselves , percieved their actions to be reasonable

New cards
66

intoxication

acted involuntary or without intent as result of alcohol and drugs, must prove that it was not self inflicted

New cards
67

accident

involuntary or unintentional or unforseable by an ordinary person

New cards
68

Impacts for assault

offender

victim

society

New cards

Explore top notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 26 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 161 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(3)
note Note
studied byStudied by 8 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 42 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 13 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 9 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 7 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 11 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards Flashcard31 terms
studied byStudied by 12 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(2)
flashcards Flashcard413 terms
studied byStudied by 2 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard311 terms
studied byStudied by 2 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard50 terms
studied byStudied by 73 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard27 terms
studied byStudied by 6 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard32 terms
studied byStudied by 2 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard26 terms
studied byStudied by 15 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(2)
flashcards Flashcard20 terms
studied byStudied by 3 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(3)