1/10
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Context
Concerned with the tendency of children to imitate adult social behavior, specifically aggression.
Observational learning- learning behavior by imitating others
Several earlier studies had demonstrated that children are influenced by witnessing adult behavior, tended to show kids repeating adult behavior in the same situation with the presence of the adult.
One purpose of this study was to test whether children will reproduce adult behavior in new situations without the adult
This study is also concerned with the learning of gender-specific behavior, previous studies have shown that kids are sensitive to it.
Ex. Agression is associated with masculinity
Also investigated whether boys were more likely to imitate aggression than girls, and whether they were more likely to imitate male than female models
Aim
To investigate observational learning of aggression. The study aimed to see whether kids would reproduce aggressive behavior when the model was not present, and to look for gender differences in learning aggression.
Participants
72- 36 male, 36 female
All selected from nursery school of Stanford
Ages from 37 months (3 years) to 69 months (5 years and 9 months)
Mean age was 4 years and 4 months
Design
Lab Experiment
Matched Pairs Design
Effect of 3 IVs-
The behavior of the model- aggressive or nonaggressive
Sex of model
Sex of children
8 conditions in all- kids in each condition were matched for their aggression levels so it wasn't a confounding variable (researcher and teacher rated 51 kids on a scale of 0-5, very good agreement achieved)
-An aggressive model was shown to 12 boys and 12 girls, six boys and six girls saw aggression modeled by a same-sex model, half saw if from a different sex model.
-A nonaggressive model was shown to 12 boys and 12 girls, half saw no-aggression modeled by same sex model, half saw if from a different sex model.
-A control group of 12 boys and 12 girls did not see a model display behavior
Procedure Stage 1
Modeling the Behavior
Kids were brought individually into a play room to play a game for ten minutes.
In the first two conditions there was additional adult in the room.
Agressive Condition- adult was aggressive toward a tall inflatable doll, saying aggressive things such as "kick him"
Nonaggressive Condition- adult assembled toys and did not interact with the doll
Control Condition- No other adult
Stage 2
Aggression Arousal
To annoy the kids and increase chances of aggressive behavior, they were taken to a different room with toys, they played with them for about 2 minutes but then were told they weren't allowed to play with them any more because they were "the very best" toys and were for other kids
Stage 3
Testing for Delayed Imitation
Children were observed playing for the next 20 minutes.
Experimenter was in the room occupied with paperwork, 2 more observers watch through a two-way mirror
The room had a lot of toys and smaller inflatable doll
Observers didn't know what condition the kids were in
Types of Aggression Recorded
Imitative- physical and verbal aggression identical to the ones modeled
Partially Imitative- Similar behavior to that carried out by the model
Non-imitative- New aggressive acts not demonstrated by the model
Results
Kids who witnessed an aggressive model were significantly more aggressive themselves
There was little difference between aggression in the control group and the non-aggressive conditions
Boys were significantly more likely it imitate aggressive male models, difference for girls was much smaller
Boys were significantly more physically aggressive, girls slightly more verbally aggressive
Conclusion
Witnessing aggression in a model can be enough to produce aggression by an observer
Children selectively imitate gender-specific behavior
Boys more likely to imitate physical aggression, girls more likely to imitate verbal aggression
Cautiously concluded that children selectively imitate same sex models
Evaluation
Lab Experiment
A lot of controls in place (the time kids watch model for, layout of room, which toys available), so reliable
Controls were high so the researchers could be confident that action of model cause the aggressive behavior
Setup was artificial because the kids were in a setting not familiar to them, low ecological validity
Some task expected from kids were unusual (watching an adult play with toys and not getting involved), low mundane realism
Quant. data
Ethics- protection, aggressive behavior might have continued