Gene explanation of crime

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/11

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

12 Terms

1
New cards

MAO-A enzyme - what it does?

breaks down neurotransmitters like serotonin

2
New cards

What do mutations in MAO-A gene do?

linked to aggression

3
New cards

Difference in men and women with MAO-A gene

MAOA is on the X chromosome
not seen as strongly in women as one X cancels out the other
more common in men

4
New cards

Brunner (1993)

studied family in Holland with very high rate of extreme violence in men in family
found they all had a mutation on MAOA gene

5
New cards

Brunner (1993) - conclusion

explains their aggressive behaviour and supports theory that criminality can run through families

6
New cards

Christiansen (1977)

twin studies support theory
3500 pair of twins in Denmark and got data from criminal record

7
New cards

Christiansen (1977) - findings

concordance rate MZ - 35%, DZ - 13%
Mz share all genes, DZ share half

8
New cards

Raine (1993) - supporting evidence

reviewed 13 twin studies
found higher concordance rate in MZ than DZ
increases validity that genes play role in criminality

9
New cards

Moffitt (1992) - how and what he was finding out

if vulnerability to violent behaviour is linked between genes and environment
longitudinal study, 442 boys from birth to 26 years

10
New cards

Moffitt (1992) - what he found

boys with low MAOA gene and abusive childhood - more likely to be criminals
compared to those with either abuse or low MAOA gene

11
New cards

AO3 - twin studies

assumption that MZ and DZ are raised in similar environments
MZ raised similar - could explain higher concordance rate
no study has found 100% so nature must play role

12
New cards

AO3 - determinism

assumes we have no choice
may reduce blame - treat criminals more humanely, prevent criminals from taking responsibility