1/40
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
legitimacy
rightful use of power in line with law or convention
Direct/pure democracy
people vote directly for the rules and laws that govern them
not used in modern times due to it’s inefficiency
Representative democracy
people vote for a representative who act on their behalf to exercise political choice
pluralist democracy
coined by robert dahl. a form of democracy wherein government decisions rely on relationships between various groups and ideologies that exist within a society, and that therefore there are several ‘centres’ of power and sources of authority in society.
Democratic deficit
a flaw in the democratic process that emerges when decisions are taken by people who lack legitimacy to be there, usually due to flaws in electoral processes or because they aren’t held accountable
caused by and often creates a participation crisis
Franchise/suffrage
the ability/right to vote in public elections
think tanks
a body of experts brought together to focus on a certain topic/several topics. they investigate and offer solutions to complex social, economic, political issues
lobbyists
paid by clients to try and influence government, MPs, Lords to act in their clients’ interests. they are often paid by pressure groups or corporations to do this.
pressure groups
groups that seek to represent the interest of a certain group of people. narrow focus.
they want to influence policy but don’t seek to be in government
their purpose → GREAT P:
G - influencing the Governing process
R - Representing interests
E - seek to Educate the public
A - want Amendments to legislation
T - a form of Tension release
P - form of non-traditional Participation
democracy
a system of government whereby the whole population/eligible members of the state have a say in how the country is run
robert dahl’s measures of democracy
require that all have equal and effective oppurtunity to:
participate in politics, share opinions
vote
understand choices, their outcomes
set the agenda; influence what’s discussed
inclusion; above rights are extended to all
polycracy
proposed by robert dahl. a third thing seperate from democracy and dictatorship, polycracy literally means ‘power of many’. it best represents what we call ‘modern democracies’, as they aren’t truly pure
participation crisis
where a significant number of citizens fail to engage with the political process e.g. by not voting, by not joining parties, by not standing for public office
creates and caused by a democratic deficit
liberal democracy
combines the idea of free and fair elections with the idea of respecting and promoting personal freedoms, both as individuals and as the state
western democracies follow this model closely. democratic deficits can be easily identified when one of these two pillars collapses
initiatives
when people propose law or constitutional amendments rather than parliament.
a very pure form of democracy that could help increase participation if introduced in the UK
but exposes minorities to rights abuses
citizens assemblies
small microcosms of society who convene to discuss an issue in depth and report back to government to try and drive change in a way that represents the people more accurately
recall elections
a procedure by which voters can remove an elected official from office before their term is over.
if an MP commits a crime or breaches the Code of Conduct, and 10% of constituents vote to have a recall election, one is held
making it easier to hold recall elections better represents the view of the people but may create vast power vacuums with bad consequences e.g. if an MP is the PM
1832 Great Reform Act
enfranchised all male middle-class property owners
expand electorate to 6% of population
1867 Second Reform Act
gives all settled (i.e. not homeless) men in boroughs (urban areas/towns) the vote
working class can vote for the first time
1884 Third Reform Act
extends the franchise to male householders and tenants in rural areas
1918 Representation of the People Act
abolished property requirements to vote; universal suffrage for men
women over 30 who meet certain property requirements can vote
1928 Equal Franchise Act
lowers voting age for women to 21, abolishes property requirements
universal adult suffrage achieved
1969 Representation of the People Act
lowers the voting age to 18 from 21
2014, 2020, 2025
2014 - Scotland lowers voting age for its parliamentary and council elections to 16
2020 - wales does the same
2025 - government commits to lowering voting age to 16 by next general election (2029 at the max)
interest/sectional group
pressure group that seeks to advance/protect the interests of its members e.g. trade unions
peak group
an association of groups (usually sectional pressure groups) with a common, but slightly broader interest. they pool their resources together to maximise the chance of achieving a goal e.g. the Trades Union Congress
cause/promotional group
pressure group who seek to promote a shared value. what they achieve does not necessarily benefit its members. e.g. greenpeace
insider groups
groups that enjoy close association with government agencies and officials. the government will consult them on legislation and policy.
core insiders are regularly consulted with
peripheral insiders rarely consulted with due to how niche their cause is
outsider groups
groups that are not regularly in discussion with government either because government won’t talk to them (usually due to their use of civil disobedience) or because they won’t talk to government (want neutrality, don’t want cause to be diluted)
access points
the channels through which pressure groups try to assert their voice and garner public support e.g. civil disobedience, rallies
1215 Magna Carta
Established that:
no-one is above the law, not even the king
habeas corpus - that no-one is to be deprived of their liberty or property without due process
social movements
groups of people united by a common goal. they lack a formal structure and are more general than cause pressure groups.
can sometimes create pressure groups (e.g. the movement for a free palestine creating palestine action, a pressure group)
1689 Bill of Rights
establishes parliamentary sovereignty - ultimate authority
a constitutional monarchy
provisions for regular parliamentary sessions, free elections, fair court process
1833 Abolition of Slavery Act
gave all slaves in the British Empire their freedom, entitling them to rights the 1689 Bill of Rights didn’t think they deserved
bottom-up liberation
BUT plantation owners handsomely compensated for loss of slave labour, so same dynamics enforced, just with money as the oppressor
1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights
signed by all members of the UN
established what fundamental human rights are
formalisation enables oppressed groups to seek justice for violations of their rights
1953 ECHR
signed by members of the Council of Europe
further entrenches human rights in UK constitution as government actions have to comply with the ECHR
violations considered in The Hague at ECtHR, not UK courts
1975 Sex Discrimination Act and 1976 Race Relations Act
made it unlawful for someone to be discriminated against in workplace over sex/marital status
made it unlawful to discriminate against someone for sex, nationality, race in and outside workplace
1984, 1988, 1998, 2018 Data Protection Acts
protects people’s data that is being held by public institutions.
2018 DPA gave people right to erasure of data and brought UK law in line with the EU GDPR (general data protection regulation) which ensures data is collected and handled safely, with valid reason.
2001 Freedom of Information Act
allows the public to request information from public authorities (though with exceptions, which has caused a lot of debate; gov can say no pretty easily)
has enabled for better journalism, holding the government to account
votes for prisoners
as set out by the 1983 Representation of the People Act
argument that if you break the law you have no right to make it.
but civil prisoners can vote; so you create a hierarchy of incarcerated people, resentment builds, institutionalisation grows
electronic voting
a possible solution to participation crisis
but presents massive security concerns that damage the secret ballot