1/30
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
what happened that caused psychologists to study the effects of institutionalisation ?
1990s - political events in Romania
what happened in the orphanages in Romania ?
large numbers of children placed in orphanages as parents could cope with strict government rules - bid to boost population
more than 100,000 children in 600 state orphanages
What are 3 documented effects of institutionalisation ?
parenting
developmental dwarfism
attachment disorder
how is parenting an effect of institutionalisation ?
lack of emotional care during early years may result in an adult that struggles to parent others
Quinton 1984 - compared 50 women raised in orphanages with 50 women raised in home
the ex-institutionalised women had children who spent time in care
how does developmental dwarfism occur ?
children who experience lack of emotional care may show physical underdevelopment eg small
how does attachment disorders show itself ?
recognised as a psychiatric condition
effects social and emotional development of children
institutionalised children have no preferred attachment figure - inability to relate to others
what are reactive/inhibited attachment disorders ?
children who are shy , withdrawn and unable to cope with most social interactions
what is dis inhibited attachment disorders ?
refers to children who are over friendly with adults and attention seek
what is the aim of the English and Romanian adoptees project ?
examine the long term effects of institutionalisation in a longitudinal study , from 1990s
to examine effects and reversibility of spending early years in a Romanian orphanage of typically poor quality
how many children were in the experimental group ?
165 - had spent early years in institutions in Romania
how many of the 165 were adopted before ages 2 ?
111
when were the remaining 54 adopted by ?
ages 4
who were the 164 Romanian adoptees compared to?
control group of 52 British children , adopted before 6 months old
when was the social , cognitive and physical development of the adoptees measured ? Who was included in the measurements ?
ages 4, 6, 11 and 15
interviews conducted with adoptive parents and teachers
what did the Romanian orphans show developmentally at the point of adoption?
delay in social , cognitive and physical progress
physically smaller
classified as mentally retarded
what did the Romanian adoptees who were adopted at 6 months or less show ?
they caught up on development when compared to British group
what did the Romanian adoptees who were adopted after 6 months show ?
continued to show significant delays in social , cognitive and physical development
difficulties making and maintaining relationships
characterised as having disinhibited attachment disorder
what was the conclusion of the ERA study ?
institutionalisation can have a severe long term effect on development , especially if children aren’t provided with adequate emotional caregiving by the time they reach 2 years old
what is a strength of the ERA study ?
real world applications to social services
changed the way children are looked after when it comes to adoption process
previously , mother’s would be encouraged to keep baby past th critical period
now , adoption occurs within one week and infants are just as securely attached to adoptive parents as biological mother
benefit of institutionalisation research for improving lives
what is a weakness of the ERA study ?
deprivation is only one factor in development
orphans had little mental stimulation and were malnourished - thus there are multiple risk factors involved in finding effects of institutional care
difficult to interpret results as there are many influences that affect the children such as living in poverty
Romanian orphanages were also particularly dire and thus don't reflect all situations where children are placed in care
lack of external validity
what was another study that investigated attachments and institutions ?
The Bucharest Early intervention project - Zeenah et al
what was the aim of the Bucharest intervention project ?
investigate attachment type of children who spent majority of life in institutional care
how many children were sampled in the bucharest project ?
100 children aged 12 months to 31 months
what percentage of the bucharest sample had spent most of life in institutions ?
90%
who were the Bucharest group compared to ?
control group who were never institutionalised
how was the infants’ attachment types assessed ?
strange situation methodology
what were the parents or carers of the institutionalised children and control group asked ? Bucharest
clingingness
attention seeking
behaviour towards adults - determine if disinhibited attachment disorder
what did Zeenah et al find ?
74% of the control group were classified as securely attached
19% of experimental group had secure attachment
65% of experimental group had disinhibited attachment disorder
what did Zeenah et al conclude ?
institutionalised infants with an absent primary caregiver that proves consistent emotional are , are less likely to develop secure attachments and more likely to have disinhibited Attachment disorders
what did Barke assess ? what did he find?
ERA adoptees at aged 22-25
continued emotional and intellectual difficulties in those adopted later - 6 months +
what did Edwards et al 2023 find ?
20% of all Romanian adoptees that become parents
of this group , 20% had parenting difficulties