1/67
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Employment-at-Will
Employer can hire/fire for any reason (or no reason) unless it violates a legal limitation (anti-discrimination laws, public policy, contractual protections).
Protected Classes
Title VII: Race, color, religion, sex (including sexual orientation + gender identity), and national origin. ADEA: Age 40 or older. ADA: Qualified individuals with physical or mental disabilities requiring reasonable accommodation.
Disparate Treatment
Intentional discrimination because of protected class status.
Plaintiff's Burden
Member of protected class. Qualified. Adverse employment action. Treated differently than similarly situated employees.
Employer's Defense
Legitimate, non-discriminatory reason. Then, burden shifts back to employee to prove pretext.
Mixed-Motive Discrimination
Employment decision based partly on illegal factor (protected class) and partly on legal factors.
Disparate Impact
Neutral policy disproportionately harms a protected group. No intent required.
Employer's Defense (Disparate Impact)
Business Necessity - the policy is job-related and consistent with business needs.
BFOQ Defense
Bona Fide Occupational Qualification. Allows intentional discrimination ONLY if reasonably necessary to business operations.
Religious Discrimination
Employer Duty: Must provide reasonable accommodation unless it causes undue burden.
Sexual Harassment - Quid Pro Quo
Supervisor conditions job benefits (hire, raise, promotion) or avoidance of negative action on submission to sexual demands.
Hostile Work Environment
Unwelcome conduct because of sex that is severe or pervasive enough to alter employment conditions (objective + subjective standard).
Employer Defense (Ellerth/Faragher)
If no tangible employment action, employer avoids liability by showing reasonable steps to prevent/correct harassment and employee unreasonably failed to use the system.
Retaliation Elements
Protected activity (complaint, participation). Adverse action. Causal connection.
ADA - Disability
Physical or mental impairment that substantially limits major life activities.
Reasonable Accommodation
Adjustment enabling employee to perform essential functions.
Undue Hardship
Significant difficulty or expense.
Age Discrimination (ADEA)
Protected Class: Employees 40+ years old.
Mixed Motives (ADEA)
Not allowed - must be the determining or 'but-for' cause.
EEOC - Administrative Exhaustion
Requirement: Before suing under Title VII, an employee must file a charge with the EEOC / state agency and receive a right-to-sue letter.
Key Defenses Overview
Business necessity (impact), BFOQ (treatment - limited), Legitimate nondiscriminatory reason (treatment), Ellerth/Faragher defense (harassment), Seniority systems allowed if non-discriminatory.
Ames v. (Supreme Court 2024)
Employers cannot discriminate for or against any protected class — even if motivated by past injustices.
Express Warranty - UCC 2-313
Creation: Any affirmation of fact or promise, description of goods, or sample/model that becomes part of the bargain and can be objectively verified.
Implied Warranty of Merchantability - UCC 2-314
Definition: When the seller is a merchant of goods of the kind, products must be fit for their ordinary purpose and conform to average quality standards.
Implied Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose - UCC 2-315
Definition: Seller knows the buyer's specific use and that buyer relies on seller's skill or judgment.
Royal Indemnity Co. v. Tyco Fire Products
Warranty liability can extend upstream in the chain of distribution (vertical privity exceptions) when injury is foreseeable.
Moss v. Batesville Casket Co.
Emotional distress claims allowed where product defect foreseeably causes severe emotional suffering linked to personal interests.
Negligence Product Liability - Four Theories
Negligent manufacture, negligent inspection, negligent failure to warn, negligent design.
Strict Liability Product Claims
Focus: The product, not the manufacturer's conduct. Product was defective and unreasonably dangerous when sold.
Defective Design Factors
Foreseeable harm, severity of harm, probability of harm, feasible alternative design, industry standards.
Risk-Utility Test
Weighs whether risks outweigh usefulness considering: cost, functionality, and safer alternatives.
Branham v. Ford Motor Co.
Establishes risk-utility test as the dominant standard in design defect cases.
Failure to Warn Elements
Foreseeable risk, lack of adequate warnings/instructions, causation of injury.
No Warning Required
When a risk is open and obvious to a reasonable consumer.
Daniell v. Ford Motor Co.
Manufacturer must warn when non-obvious dangers associated with foreseeable misuse could cause harm.
Damages - Basis-of-the-Bargain
Contract measure - difference between value promised and value received.
Consequential Damages
Include personal injuries, emotional distress, lost wages, property damage, loss of consortium/enjoyment.
Punitive Damages
Awarded for willful or reckless disregard for safety - to punish + deter.
Privity - Vertical Privity
Relationship in the supply chain (manufacturer → distributor → retailer → buyer).
Vertical Privity
Relationship in the supply chain (manufacturer → distributor → retailer → buyer).
Horizontal Privity
Extends protection to family members, guests, bystanders injured by the defective product.
Limitation on Consequential Damages
Allowed only for purely economic loss. Cannot limit when personal injury is involved - may be unconscionable and unenforceable.
Product misuse
Not reasonably foreseeable use.
Assumption of risk
Knew danger, used anyway.
Comparative negligence
Plaintiff fault reduces recovery.
Foreseeability
Manufacturer liable for harms that are reasonably foreseeable at time of design/manufacture.
Supremacy Clause
Federal law preempts conflicting state law.
Preemption Doctrine
Even if a state law is within the state's border, it is invalid if it interferes with interstate commerce or contradicts federal regulation.
Commerce Clause
Congress may regulate interstate commerce, and intrastate activities that have a substantial effect on interstate commerce.
Incorporation Doctrine
Most of the Bill of Rights applies to states through the 14th Amendment Due Process Clause.
Procedural Due Process
Before the government deprives life, liberty, or property: Must provide notice + opportunity to be heard before a neutral decision-maker.
Substantive Due Process
Protects fundamental rights from unjustified government interference.
Equal Protection Clause
Government must treat similarly-situated individuals alike unless justified by a legitimate legal purpose.
Strict Scrutiny
Applied When: Law targets suspect classifications (race, ethnicity, national origin) or restricts fundamental rights.
Intermediate Scrutiny
Applied When: Laws involving biological sex or commercial speech.
Rational Basis Test
Applied When: All other classifications (economic, social policy). Gov't wins unless law is purely based on hostility or prejudice.
Political Speech Protection
Highest level of protection. Corporations have same political speech rights as individuals (Citizens United logic).
Commercial Speech
Regulated under intermediate scrutiny unless it includes a political component → triggers strict scrutiny.
True Threats Standard
Speech must show objective manifestation of intent to commit violence - insults/obscenity alone are not enough.
Caremark Duties (In re Caremark)
Directors must implement reasonable compliance and monitoring systems.
Duty of Care
Make informed, prudent decisions.
Duty of Loyalty
Avoid self-dealing / conflicts.
Duty of Obedience
Act within corporate authority & law.
Duty of Good Faith & Disclosure
Honesty, transparency, oversight.
Business Judgment Rule
Presumption courts do not second-guess informed, good-faith decisions made in honest belief they benefit shareholders.
Director Oversight Liability
Failure to monitor legal/reputational risks = breach of duty of oversight.
Shareholder Primacy Rule
The legal purpose of a corporation is Shareholder Wealth Maximization (SWM).
Stakeholder Theory
Philosophy prioritizing employees, community, environment - NOT the law.