1/36
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Linear relationships
In a graph showing the changing variables, a pattern in which the data points tend to cluster around a straight line
Experimental research strategy
A research strategy that attempts to establish the existence of a cause-and-effect relationship between two variables by manipulating one variable while manipulating one variable while measuring the second variable and controlling all other variables
External validity
The extent to which we can generalize the results of a research study to people, settings, times, measures, and characteristics other than those used in that study
Internal Validity
The extent to which a research study produces single, unambigious explanation for the relationship between two variables
Extraneous variable
Any variable that exists within a study other than the variables being studied. In an experiment, any variable other than the independent and dependent variables
Confounding variable
A extraneous variable (usually unmonitored) that is allowed to change systematically along with the two variables being studied. In the context of an experiment, an extraneous variable that changes systematically along with the independent variable and has the potential to influence the dependent variable.
Convenience Sampling
A nonprobability sampling method involving selection of individuals on the basis of their availability and willingness to respond; that is, because they are easy to get.
Debriefing
An explanation of the study or what the true purpose, usually if the study involved deception
Empiricism
Knowing through a different sensory observation, usually not a good science
Deductive reasoning
Drawing a conclusion intended to follow logically from a given set of premises, reasoning from general to specific
Validity
The ability of a test to measure what one thinks it is measuring
Reliability
The ability of a test to get the same result over and over again
Operational definition
Clearly defining every part of the hypothesis, words aren’t as important in this scenario (?)
Independent variable
The aspect of an experiment that the experimenter manipulates
Dependent variable
A variable that is measured, counted, or recorded by the investigator (outcome of the experiment)
Nominal
Categorical data where one counts every member in a group and names said group: different color of hair
Ordinal
Putting variables/data in order in some fashion: strongly disagree to strongly agree
Interval
Numbers with meaning- for example, 0 degrees C doesn’t mean a lack of temperature
Ratio
Numbers where 0 means a lack of something, for example, 0 cats
Range effects
Data should be nice and in the middle of a set in order to avoid floor and ceiling effects
Floor effect
A test is too hard and the tail of a study is steered to the right. example- test at school is too hard so everyone gets a 50 (hit the floor)
Ceiling effect
A test is much too easy and has an extreme left tail. for example- my students all get a 100 on a test
Quantitative research
Research with numbers that can be analyzed
Qualitative research
Non-number research, usually survey/interview based
Beneficence and non-malfeasance
Experiments must benefit people and not harm then
Convenience sampling
Taking whatever participants you can find without random sampling, often gives very skewed results, used the most due to ease
Purposive sampling
“snowball samples,” finding people who fit your criteria and then asking them to ask their friends to join your study
Quota samples
Seeking out people from different groups and then trying to get a certain number from each group (ex- getting 50 men and 50 women)
Sample/selection bias
When the participants in the study don’t look like the population one wants to generalize to, sampling doesn’t represent the population being generalized to
Compensatory Equalization
A threat to internal validity that occurs when an untreated group demands to receive a treatment that is the same as or equivalent to the treatment received by another group in the research study.
Diffusion
A threat to internal validity that occurs when a treatment effect spreads from the treatment group to the control group, usually from participants talking to each other.
Compensatory rivalry
A threat to internal validity that occurs when an untreated group learns about special treatment received by another group, then works extra hard to show they can perform just as well as that group.
Resentful demoralization
A threat to internal validity that occurs when an untreated group learns of special treatment given to another group, and becomes less productive and less motivated because they resent the other group’s expected superiority.
Differential attrition
A threat to internal validity that occurs when attrition in one group is systematically different from the attrition in another group.
Two Independent Samples t-test
To see if there is signifcant difference bewteen the mean of two unrelated groups
Paired Samples t-test
Comparing sampling distribution of the sample mean of the difference scores to the sampling
distribution of the hypothetical mean of the difference scores. SIMILAR GROUPS
Anova
Comparing groups, more than three with one independent variable and multiple dependent