1/11
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
What is forensic psychology
meaning of or before the forum
at the intersection of psychology, legal systems and criminal justice
Any application of psychological knowledge or methods to the legal system.
Deals with evidence, witnesses, and the courts (legal psychology), and understanding/reducing criminal behaviour (criminological psychology)
Devlin enquiry
In 1976 which called for psychological research into identification of suspects.
19th-20th century
Application of psychological theory to criminal behaviour:
•Biological aspects, e.g., physiognomy, heritability, personality.
•Environmental factors, e.g. attachment, social learning theory, operant conditioning.
•Internal processes, e.g. cognitions and emotions, moral development.
20th century
From “nothing works” (Martinson, 1974) to “what works” (Andrews & Bonta, 1994; McGuire, 1995).
21st century
Positive and strength-based treatment approaches (e.g. Good Lives Model; Ward & Gannon, 2006).
Code of ethics and conduct (BPS)
Framework for guiding decision-making.
Four principles:
-Respect
-Competence
-Responsibility
-Integrity
Each is described with a statement of values.
applications of forensic psychology
police interviewing: suspect interrogations, false confessions, interviewing, detecting deception (polygraphs)
offender profiling: using information at the crime scene to build a profile of the possible perpetrator (area, time of day and of week) which narrows down the suspect list
geographical profiling: using locations of a connected series of crime sites to determine the most probable areas of an offenders residence
evidence-based policing: understanding what works” to reduce crime and disorder to make the most efficient use of police resources e.g., hot spot policing, longer/frequent patrols, body worn cameras
critical incident decision making: responses to major incidents such as major police investigations, CT operations, and disaster response.
eyewitness testimony: Accounts given by people of a crime, including identification of suspects or victims, details of the crime scene and so on (important as 75% overturned convictions)
jury decision making:
forensic assessment: e.g., risk assessment which involves estimating the likelihood of reoffending using specialised risk assessment tools.
offender treatment: Developing and implementing treatment frameworks to reduce reoffending and improve wellbeing.
polygraphs
lie detector
measures physiological responses (hear rate sweating, blood pressure)
detects bodily signs
since 2014 can be used for sex offenders on parole
HOWEVER, issues with reliability and validity
Do not know for sure what they measure
Quality of evidence
Some better than others (using crime related info only the suspect would know)
effectiveness of body worn cameras
used by 70% of the police force
Increases public confidence/trust in police
Reduces force used by and against police
Can be used as evidence in trials
RCTs & Systematic reviews have found mixed result
Citizen complaints- consistent in that compliant decrease
Issue of discretion- cameras need to be on all the time
Problems with bias and methodology- due to time so is not generalisable
Fairness of jury trails
not very prevalent (only used in 1% of UK criminal cases
Not all juries are representative
Juries attitudes and defendant characteristics matter
Pre-trial publicity
Jurors find it difficult to understand legal directions
BUT
Jurors and judges tend to agree in most cases (89%)
= proposals to improve jury system
“nothing works/what works” view of rehabilitating offenders
general pessimism around offender rehabilitation
Martinson (1974) review concluded there is no significant effect
On average mean reduction of reoffending is 5-10% after treatment
Cognitive and behavioural more effective than others
Strength-based approaches have higher chance of working
Should target specific risk factors
Describe the pathway to forensic chartership and registered practitioner status
graduate in Psychology accredited by BPS
MSc in forensic psychology
qualification in forensic psychology: involves 2-4 years of supervised practice which requires working in a suitable role
must demonstrated competencies in: Conducting interventions, assessments and evaluations with clients, applied forensic research, supporting and advising other professionals, consultancy and policy
chartered and full DFP membership, HCPC status