1/19
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
role of natural selection
fine tunes phenotypes to their environment
population genetics models of natural selection
help us see how adaptation comes about
predict the outcome of selection (equilibrium allele frequency at a locus)
predict rate of evolutionary change (rate of change in allele frequency at a locus)
examine the interaction of selection with other population processes
peppered moth example of natural selection
coating of trees with soot due to coal usage in 19th century Britain
light-coloured moths became easier to spot by predators
in about a hundred years (a hundred generations), white form was nearly replaced by dark form
absolute fitness
percentage of individuals who survive to have offspring
relative fitness
relative to the phenotype with the highest survival, differences in fitness due to a particular phenotype
genotype frequency weighted by fitness
wAAfAA
wAA = relative fitness of AA individuals
fAA = starting frequency of AA genotype
average fitness for population
Wavg = fAAwAA + fAawAa + faawaa
genotype frequency after selection
wAAfAA / Wavg
types of selection
directional: selection of one favoured allele
balancing: two or more alleles can be favoured
negative frequency dependent selection
heterozygote advantage
negative frequency dependent selection
rarer form is always favoured
tends to maintain allele frequencies in population
ex: right- or left-mouthed fish, selection mediated by learned predator-avoidance behaviour
ex: self-pollination by flowers, mediated by self-incompatibility and rare mate type advantage
heterozygote advantage
heterozygous individuals have trait advantageous to either homozygous individual
both alleles are maintained in population
ex: sickle cell anemia, heterozygote does not have sickle cell anemia (or only mild) but is resistant to malaria
model of relative fitness for heterozygote advantage
wAA = 1-t
wAa = 1
waa = 1-s
deleterious mutation-selection interaction
mutations are constantly reintroduced as selection removes them from the gene pool, resulting in a dynamic equilibrium with a non-zero standing quantity of mutation (genetic disease is maintained)
selective sweeps
SNPs linked with advantageous novel variant are dragged along and also become more common, reducing genetic variance in that region
can reduce diversity in genomic regions, especially those with low rates of recombination
leaves behind a trace of past events that have influenced the genome
complex / quantitative traits
population variated is controlled by many genes and sometimes also environmental factors
quantitative genetic variation
distribution of phenotypic states is often bell-shaped (bell curve)
important for understanding the evolution of common diseases, crop improvement, and the rate of evolutionary change
continuous complex traits
traits that display a continuous range of variation rather than distinct categories
threshold complex traits
trait is either displayed or not
trait is only displayed after surpassing a certain threshold
showing of trait depends on environmental liability and genetic liability
variance
measurement of how far each number in a data set is from the mean, and thus from every other number in the set
multifactorial model for complex trait variation
phenotypic variance can be decomposed into variance that is attributable to environmental factors and genetic factors