1/20
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Ethics
principles of right and wrong that guide behaviour
e.g. avoiding plagarism
Legal Frameworks
laws based on ethics to regulate behaviour
e.g. not sharing someone's private information without consent
Best Practice
going beyond legal requirements to act ethically
e.g. asking for clear permission before collecting personal data
Standards
formal rules that define and enforce best practice
e.g. following guidelines like GDPR to protect personal data
DPA before 2018
Granted rights to ‘data subjects’:
Example: Individuals could request a copy of personal data held about them (Subject Access Request).
Imposed obligations on organisations:
Example: Organisations had to ensure personal data was securely stored
Introduced the Information Commissioner role:
Example: The Information Commissioner could issue fines for noncompliance and maintain a register of data controllers
DPA after 2018
Expanded rights for data subjects:
Example: Introduced the Right to be Forgotten, allowing individuals to request data deletion
Stricter obligations for organisations
Example: Required organisations to notify authorities of data breaches within 72 hours
Strengthened the role of the Information Commissioner:
Example: Increased fines, up to €20 million or 4% of global turnover, for non-compliance
Why GDPR Compliance Matters
If you collect personal data about EU citizens (data subjects): You must comply with GDPR, regardless of where your organisation is based
In the UK: Investigation and enforcement are carried out by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO)
Penalties for Non-Compliance: Major fines – up to 4% of global turnover or €20 million, whichever is higher
Takeaway: Compliance is essential to avoid significant financial and reputational damage
Rights to Data Subjects
Consent:
Data collection requires informed and freely given consent
Individuals can withdraw consent at any time
Right to Be Forgotten:
Individuals can request data deletion
Example: Request data deletion
Right of Access:
Individuals can access their personal data held by organisations
Example: Request access to your data
Breach Notification:
Organisations must notify individuals and regulators of data breaches
Example: 2023 breach information
Personal Data
Any information relating to a person who can be directly or indirectly identified
Only applies to natural persons (i.e., living individuals)
Re-identification is surprisingly easy, even if identifying details are removed
Sensitive Personal Data
Includes data about protected attributes (e.g., health, race, religion)
Full list: Protected Attributes
Requires greater justification for collection
Must be protected with higher security measures
Personal vs Sensitive Data
sensitive personal data involves stricter rules and protections due to its potential impact on individuals
Principles of GDPR
Lawfulness, Fairness, and Transparency:
Comply with other laws and provide evidence of lawfulness
Purpose Limitation:
Collect data only for specified, valid reasons and inform individuals
Data Minimisation:
Limit data collection to what is relevant and necessary for the stated purposes
Accuracy:
Ensure data is up to date and allow individuals to correct inaccuracies
Storage Limitation:
Delete data when it is no longer needed
Integrity and Confidentiality:
Protect data from unauthorised access or breaches
Accountability:
Demonstrate compliance with GDPR by keeping records and documenting actions
Equality Act of 2010
Replaced previous equality laws to simplify protections
Protects against discrimination:
Direct: Treating someone unfairly due to a protected characteristic
Indirect: Policies or practices that disadvantage certain groups
Monitored by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC):
Make a claim: EHRC Guidance
Focuses on digital services and AI impacts
Linked to GDPR: Ensures fairness and lawfulness in data use
Example: If an AI system is trained using personal data, it must not only comply with GDPR but also ensure it does not discriminate against protected groups (e.g., based on gender, race, or disability) under the Equality Act. This connection ensures fairness in both data handling and its outcomes
Positive Action (Recommended)
Steps to improve representation and inclusion
Examples:
Helping individuals overcome disadvantages
Meeting specific needs
Encouraging underrepresented groups to participate (e.g., through targeted outreach)
Positive Discrimination (Unlawful)
Treating one group less favourably than another
Example: Refusing to hire men solely to increase the number of women
Roles in AI Development
Business owner - defines business goals and requirements
Data scientist - uses data to train models to meet requirements
Model validator - uses business goals, regulations, and best practices to test models
AI operations engineer - deploys and monitors models in running services
AI Lifecycle (Roles)
Business owner - facts about model purpose and governance
Data scientist - facts about data transformation, features and performance
Model validator - facts about fairness, privacy, functionality and verification
AI operations engineer - facts about performance, drift, learning and monitoring
Factsheets
Standardised documents providing key details about an AI system's purpose, design, data, and performance, tailored for different stakeholders to ensure transparency and accountability
Once you’ve gathered all the information, it must be tailored to the needs of different stakeholders, such as clients, risk managers, and auditors
IBM is standardising the AI lifecycle documentation process through Factsheets
Algorithmic Transparancy
The profession is moving towards producing auditable documentation for AI systems, with efforts like the UK's Algorithmic Transparency Standard
Challenges remain in defining facts that demonstrate compliance with legal concepts like fairness (transparency and accountability )
Active research focuses on developing metrics to evaluate AI systems against regulations and best practices
AI Safety Summit 2023
Unprecedented Global Coordination: World leaders, including China, came together to discuss AI governance
AI Expert Panel Established: Tasked with identifying and assessing potential AI risks
Consensus on Regulation: Agreement that AI requires robust regulatory frameworks
Government Testing Plans: Commitment to testing AI systems to ensure safety and accountability
Criticisms of AI Summit
Bias Towards Big Tech:
Large tech companies have a disproportionate advantage because:
They helped shape the laws, giving them insider knowledge
They have the financial resources to navigate compliance
They already have established governance processes, unlike smaller organisations
Standards and Enforcement:
No clear agreement on global standards or mechanisms to enforce regulations
Governance Model:
Should regulation be top-down (government led) or democratic (inclusive and participatory)?
Role of the Tech Industry:
Is it appropriate for the tech industry to shape the very rules that govern their technologies