1/61
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Tanaim (When lived, where, what they did, examples of people)
When: 0-200; after 2nd Beit Hamikdash destruction
Where: Israel
What: wrote Mishna, Brita (rulings of the Tanaim not included in the Mishna)
Examples: ืจืื ืืืืขืืจ; ืจื ืืืืฉืข; ืืื ืืฉืืื; ืจืื ืืืืืื - ( Rabban Gamliel promoted unity and "ืื ืืืืืงืช ืืืฉืจืื")
Amoraim (When lived, where, what they did, examples of people)
When: 200-500
Where: Israel; ืึผืื (Iran/Iraq)
What: wrote the Gemara (analysis of the Mishna)
Examples: ืฉืืืื; ืจืื ืืืกืฃ; ืจืืืื
Rishonim (When lived, where, what they did, examples of people)
When: 1000-1500
Where: spread thru Western Europe
What: commentary/analysis of Gemara
Examples: (born in Spain-> died in Egypt)- ืจืฉื; ืจืืื- (born Germany died in France); ืจืืื (lived from 1204-1245, 41yrs); ืืขืื ืชืืกืคืืช- ( 1250-1350, France, "the additions" (additional analysis), ืจืืื ื ืชื was a Tosfot
What did the ืืขืื ืชืืกืคืืช / ืจืืื ื ืชื write? Rishonim pt 2
Rishonim
1. ืื ืืืืงื - Strong 14 / Mishna Torah
2. Code of Law: ืืืจื ื ืืืืื - Guide to the Perplexed (philosophy)
3. ืคืืจืืฉ ืืืฉื ืืืช - commentary of the Mishna
What was Rav Yosef Karo's response to the Spanish Inquisition according to Rabbi Yisrael Mayer Kagen?
Recovering what was lost by writing the ืฉืืืื ืขืจืื (code of law written by Rav Yosef Karo)
Acharonim (When lived, where, what they did, examples of people)
When: 1500-1940
Where: Eastern Europe (Poland, Russia, Lithuania, Ukraine, etc...)
What: wrote commentary on ืฉืืืื ืขืจืื (code of law written by Rav Yosef Karo)
Examples: ืจืื ืืฉืจืื ืืืืจ ืงืืื who wrote ืืฉื ื ืืจืืจื/ืืืืืืช ืฉืืช (1907)
ืืคืฅ ืืืื
Shulchan Aruch (When lived, where and who, what they did)
When: 1550's
Where & Who: Israel, ืฆืคืช - Rav Yosef Karo; Poland - ืจืื (Rav Moshe Isrelis)
What: Rav Yosef Karo created the code of law/ ืฉืืืื ืขืจืื
Vocab words: ื ืื
"to gore" (ืืื ืงืื ืื:)
Vocab words: ื ืืง
"damage" (ืืื ืงืื ืื:)
Vocab words: ืจืืื
"evidence/proof" (ืืื ืงืื ืื:)
Vocab words: ืชื ืื
"it was taught in a Brita" (ืืื ืงืื ืื:)
Vocab words: ื ืื
"also" (ืืื ืงืื ืื:)
Vocab words: ืืื
"this" (ืืื ืงืื ืื:)
Vocab words: ืื ืืื
"from where" (ืืื ืงืื ืื:)
Vocab words: ืฉื ืืืจ
"as it was said" (ืืื ืงืื ืื:)
Vocab words: ืืชืงืืฃ
"to attack/contradict" (ืืื ืงืื ืื:)
Vocab words: ืื
"behold" (ืืื ืงืื ืื:)
Vocab words: ืงืจื
"a passuk/text" (ืืื ืงืื ืื:)
Vocab words: ืืืื
"to go" (ืืื ืงืื ืื:)
Vocab words: ืืืคืื
"itself" (ืกื ืืืจืื ืขื:)
Vocab words: ืื ื
"from where" (ืกื ืืืจืื ืขื:)
Vocab words: ืืชื
"to come/arrive" (ืกื ืืืจืื ืขื:)
Vocab words: ืงืืื
"before him" (ืกื ืืืจืื ืขื:)
Vocab words: ืืื
"go!" (ืกื ืืืจืื ืขื:)
Vocab words: ืงืืืื
"kill him" (ืกื ืืืจืื ืขื:)
Vocab words: ืืคื
"more" (ืกื ืืืจืื ืขื:)
Vocab words: ืืืืื
"perhaps/maybe" (ืกื ืืืจืื ืขื:)
Vocab words: ืืืฆื
"how" (ืืจืืืช ืื:)
Vocab words: ืื ื ืืืื (ืืดื )
"these words" (ืืจืืืช ืื:)
Vocab words: ืืืืขื
"required" (ืืจืืืช ืื:)
Vocab words: ืื
"one" (ืืจืืืช ืื:)
Vocab words: ืืืจ
"afterwards" (ืืจืืืช ืื:)
Vocab words: ืืืื
"the other" (ืืจืืืช ืื:)
Vocab words: ืืขื
"to steal (from G-d)" (ืืจืืืช ืื:)
Vocab words: ืืืืช
"volume of an olive size" (ืจืืืดื ืืจืืืช ื:ื)
Vocab words: ืืืจื ืกืืคืจืื
"words of scholars" (ืจืืืดื ืืจืืืช ื:ื)
Vocab words: ืื ืฉืืื
"any amount" (ืจืืืดื ืืจืืืช ื:ื)
Key Phrases - Definition, significance, source: โืฉืืจ ืชื
Definition: "innocent/gentle cow" - not worn with a history of damage
Significance: only liable for 50% damages
Source: (ืืื ืงืื ืื:)
Key Phrases - Definition, significance, source: ืฉืืจ ืืืขื
Definition: "repeatedly dangerous cow" - history of violent behavior (3x pattern)
Significance: liable for 100% damages
Source: (ืืื ืงืื ืื:)
Key Phrases - Definition, significance, source: โืืืืงืื
Definition: "to divide/split"
Significance: in situations of doubt, split it. - ืกืืืืืก's position
(because you don't know whose fault it is)
Source: (ืืื ืงืื ืื:)
Key Phrases - Definition, significance, source: โืืืืฆืื ืืืืืจื ืขืืื ืืจืืื
Definition: "if you want to take from someone else, you must have evidence" (ืืืืื's opinion)
Significance: you have to have evidence because ppl can lie
Source: (ืืื ืงืื ืื:)
Key Phrases - Definition, significance, source: ืกืืจื ืืื/ืืื
Definition: "it is logical"
Significance: logic has the power to create laws
Source: (ืืื ืงืื ืื:)
Key Phrases - Definition, significance, source: โืืืจื ืืื ืืขืืืจ
Definition: "you shall be killed, do not break them"
Significance: cannot break 3 cardinal sins: adultery, idolatry, murder (ืจืืฆื)
- super ืืืืจืืืชื
Source: (ืกื ืืืจืื ืขื:)
Key Phrases - Definition, significance, source: โืคืืงืื ื ืคืฉ
Definition: "to save a life"
Significance: you are allowed to break MOST ืืืืจืืืชื laws to save a life. (except for cardinal sins)
Source: (ืกื ืืืจืื ืขื:)
Key Phrases - Definition, significance, source: โืงืืืฉ ืืืืืืื ืืืณ
Definition: "they are Holy, give praise to G-d"
Significance: the Gemara tried to use this as a source for the law of ืืจืืืช, but it ultimately teaches us that we must desanctify fruit.
Source: (ืืจืืืช ืื:)
Key Phrases - Definition, significance, source: โืืืืื (ืคืืืื)
Definition: "desanctify"
Significance: if you want to use something Holy, you must desanctify
- exchange it for its monetary value.
Source: (ืืจืืืช ืื:)
Key Phrases - Definition, significance, source: โืืขืืื
Definition: "stealing theft (from G-d)"
Significance: if you don't say a blessing on your food, you are stealing from G-d.
Source: (ืืจืืืช ืื:)
How much does an owner have to pay if his/her โืฉืืจ ืชื causes damage?
50%, as long as they have proof.
How much does an owner have to pay if his/her โืฉืืจ ืืืขื causes damage?
100%, as long as there is proof.
Under what circumstances can you violate a ืืืืจืืืชื law?
โืคืืงืื ื ืคืฉ = saving a life, except for โืืืจื ืืื ืืขืืืจ, the three cardinal sins.
What are the three "โืืืจื ืืื ืืขืืืจ" laws?
The three cardinal sins are:
- adultery
- idolatry
- murder ืจืืฆื
Does one always have to make a ืืจืื ืืืจืื ื after eating? Explain.
- No, only if one has had a ืืืืช. (a significant amount)
- If one has eaten a crumb, where they're still hungry, it is less than a ืืืืช.
Does one always have to make a ืืจืื ืจืืฉืื ื before eating? Explain.
Yes, it's asking G-d for permission/please to eat His food.
Review - summary/content, concepts/big ideas: (ืืื ืงืื ืื:)
Summary/Content:
1) Ox gores cow, but unsure how the baby cow was killed...
2) 50% for cow, 25% for baby cow...
3) "When in doubt, split it." - โืื ืืืจื ืกืืืืืก ("ืืืืงืื")
*1/2 of 50% in this case = 25%...
4) But โืืืืื say: "โืืืืฆืื ืืืืจื ืขืืื ืืจืืืื" - "You must have evidence when bringing it to a person." ...
5) ืชื ืื ื ืื ืืื - "This was also taught in a Brita"
6) ืกืืจื ืืื! - "It is logical!"
- Type of ืกืืจื: common sense - "When in pain, go to the doctor"; Status of ืกืืจื: is ืืืืจืืืชื; Role of ืกืืจื :ืกืืจื creates laws...
7) Source/โืื ืืื of "โืืืืฆืื ืืืืจื ืขืืื ืืจืืืื"? It's logic! - Rav Ashi
Concepts/Big Ideas:
2- "repeatedly dangerous cow" pay full โืฉืืจ ืชื/โืฉืืจ ืืืขื "innocent/gentle cow" pay half
3- ืืืืงืื/โืืืืืงื - "to split" when in doubt split
4- "โืืืืฆืื ืืืืจื ืขืืื ืืจืืืื"
"You must have evidence when bringing it to a person."
Review - summary/content, concepts/big ideas: (ืกื ืืืจืื ืขื:)
Summary/Content:
1) What is the source for murder being part of "โืืืจื ืืื ืืขืืืจ"
2) ืกืืจื ืืื! - "It is logical!"
3) ex. Mary Durai threatened to kill me unless I kill so-and-so.
4) "You shall die, do not kill" - Rava (bc of cardinal sins)
5)Because... we cannot weigh the value of human life.
Concepts/Big Ideas:
1- "โืืืจื ืืื ืืขืืืจ" is the 3 cardinal sins. You can violate ืืืืจืืืชื laws in order to "save a life" - โืคืืงืื ื ืคืฉ, EXCEPT for the 3 cardinal sins.
2- Type of ืกืืจื: moral reasoning; Status of ืกืืจื: super ืืืืจืืืชื; Role of ืกืืจื :ืกืืจื expands a law
5- ืดโืื ืืืืจ ืืืื ืืืื ืกืืืง ืืคืืด - "Who says that your blood is redder than others?"
Review - summary/content, concepts/big ideas: (ืืจืืืช ืื:)
Summary/Content:
1) Mishna says: make Brachot on food before eating.
2) Gemara asks: What's the source for this law? (from Brita)
3) Answer #1: pasuk - "ืงืืืฉ ืืืืืืื ืืืณ" - "they are Holy, give praise to G-d"
4) Challenge: this pasuk cannot be Brachot's source bc it's already needed as the source of desanctification.
5) Rather, the source for the obligation to make Brachot is ืกืืจื.
6) ืื ืื ืื ื ืื ืืขืืื ืืื ืืื ืืจืื ืืขืืด" - "Anyone who benefits from this world without saying a Bracha is stealing from G-d." - Rambam
Concepts/Big Ideas:
1- Brachot: ืืขืฅ, ืืืืื, ืฉืืื, ืืืคื, etc...
- ืืืืช, achrona, rishona
3- *ืขืจืื - In Israel, you can't eat fruit from the tree in the first three years. *ื ืืข ืจืืขื - you can eat the fruit in the 4th year... bc of desanctification
4- not using a pasuk twice,
*ืฉืืจื โ - Levi'im would sing when ืงืืจืื ืืช were brought out.
- Type of ืกืืจื: religious reasoning; Status of ืกืืจื: (Rambam) - ืืจืื ื; Role of ืกืืจื :ืกืืจื creates a law
Review - summary/content, concepts/big ideas:
(ืจืืืดื ืืืืืช ืืจืืืช ื:ื-ื)
Summary/Content:
1) ืืจืืืช is ืืจืื ื
2) We make ืืจืื ืจืืฉืื ื on any food we eat, always.
3) We only make โืืจืื ืืืจืื ื on foods that satisfy us, a ืืืืช "volume of an olive size"
Concepts/Big Ideas:
2- Like a please
3- Like a thank you
How do laws get made in Halakha?
- ืกืืจื
- Text, precedent, consensus (TPC)
- majority/chachamim
- minhag/the people
What can ืกืืจื do within the Halakhic system?
- create/expand
Bava Kama: create
Sanhedrin: expand
Brachot: create
What is the status of laws that are shaped by ืกืืจื?
both - ืืจืื ื and ืืืืจืืืชื
Are all types of ืกืืจื the same?
Not all types of ืกืืจื are the same, each Gemara has different types. Bava Kama was common sense, Sanhedrin is moral reasoning, Brachot is religious reasoning.
Is ืกืืจื part of the halakhic process or separate from it?
ืกืืจื is apart of the Halakhic process bc it helps us create and expand on laws, helps us make choices.