AQA English Language Paper 2
Types of gender theories
Dominance
Deficit
Difference
Tannen ‘vs’ theory
Advice vs understanding
Conflict vs compromise
Independence vs intimacy
Info vs feelings
Orders vs proposals
Status vs support
Zimmerman and West
96-100% of interruptions come from men (1975)
Socialisation
process by which individuals' behaviours are conditioned and shaped.
Marked Form
form which stands out as different from the norm.
Covert marking
marking that is understood and less obvious- e.g. young/old or lord vs lady
Overt marking
marking that takes place through affixation or modification - e.g. master vs mistress
Covert prestige
high status given to non-standard forms.
Trudgill
Studied people in Norwich to see how they pronounce the suffix 'ing'. Men tended to use more non-standard pronunciation. (1974) - also region*
Jenny Cheshire
Studied teenagers in Reading. Boys used more non-standard forms. She thought this was because boys were part of denser social networks. (1982)
Lakoff's deficits
domestic lexis, precise colours, weak expletives, 'empty' adjectives, tag questions, polite euphemisms, hedges, intensifiers.
Semantic Derrogation
The negative connoted meanings that some lexical items have attached to them.
Semantic deterioration
the process by which negative associations become attached to lexical items.
Tautology
The reason why the term, 'family woman' is not a recognised expression.
Collocation
Words that occur regularly with others: e.g. nagging wife.
Folklinguistics
Popular myths about language: e.g. women talk more than men.
Vocal fry
Low, staccato vibrations occurring towards the end of an utterance, previously an aspect of male speech but now used extensively by women. It is thought to have the effect of making the person sound serious.
O'Barr and Atkins 1980
Disputed Lakoff, said that it was males and females of low social status who used these linguistic features.
More about powerless language than gender
Beattie
Questioned Zimmerman and West's theory that men's interruptions were a sign of dominance. Study used x10 as many participants and found both interrupt equally
Coates
'Women's talk' falls into four categories
1) Bitching
2) Chatting
3) House Talk
4) Scandal
Difference theorists
Pilkington - Men’s ‘locker-room’ talk, insults and taboo language created bonds in all male groups
Tannen - Male = report, Women = rapport
Millett - ‘The tones and ethos of men’s house culture is sadistic, power-oriented and latently homosexual, frequently narcissistic in its energy and motives’
Dominance theorists
Spender - Male as norm (man-made, his-tory, Mr first)
Stanley - 220 words for promiscuous woman, only 20 for male
Holmes - Women referred to as food/animals (infantalise)
The Bechdel Test
If a piece of entertainment (book/show/film) has:
Two women
Who talk to each other
About something other than men
Deficit theories
Jesperson - Women’s language littered with non-fluency features because they speak before thinking
ESRC (Econ and social research council) - Women use ‘fuck’ 50x more often than pre-1990
Lakoff - hedging/ back-channelling, weak adjectives etc