1/15
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
North Sea Continental Shelf (1969)
-- Set the test for proving Customary International Law (CIL), requiring widespread practice and opinio juris
Fisheries Jurisdiction (1973)
--Reaffirmed that treaties cannot be escaped by unilateral acts
Tehran Hostages (1980)
Clarified that state inaction combined with endorsement leads to the attribution of private conduct to the State
Nicaragua v. US (1986)
Ruled the US violated CIL norms on the use of force and non-intervention; established the effective control test for attribution
East Timor (1995)
Confirmed the Monetary Gold principle, whereby the ICJ cannot adjudicate the rights/obligations of an absent, non-consenting third state
Gabcíkovo-Nagymaros (1997)
Reaffirmed pacta sunt servanda and rejected the broad use of "necessity" as an excuse for suspending a treaty
NATO bombing of Yugoslavia (1999)
Demonstrated that consent controls jurisdiction even when a violation may have occurred
2004 Advisory Opinion in Palestine
Found the separation wall violated international law, including the prohibition on annexation and the Fourth Geneva Convention, and rejected Israel's self-defence claim
Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (2007)
Ruled Serbia failed in its obligation to prevent and punish genocide under the Genocide Convention, but did not directly commit genocide itself
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)
S.A.S. v. France
Upheld the French veil ban, accepting the "living together" justification and applying a wide margin of appreciation to the restricting state
UN Human Rights Committee (UNHRC)
Yaker v. France and Hebbadj v. France
Rejected the French veil ban, finding violations of ICCPR Art. 18 and Art. 26, interpreting limitations clauses narrowly, and rejecting the "living together" justification
US Supreme Court
The Paquete Habana (1898)
Established that Customary International Law is binding law in national courts unless overridden by statute, demonstrating the use of long and consistent state practice to prove CIL
Asakura v. Seattle (1921)
Ruled that treaties are part of US law, illustrating the domestic impact of international law