Microeconomics Theme 3 <3

studied byStudied by 11 people
5.0(1)
Get a hint
Hint

1 niche market 2 diseconomies of scale 3 conflicting objectives (family business)

1 / 140

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

141 Terms

1

1 niche market 2 diseconomies of scale 3 conflicting objectives (family business)

why firms stay small

New cards
2

1 higher profits 2 economies of scale 3 increased market share and price setting power

why firms grow big

New cards
3

1 internal growth (use profits to increase output) 2 external growth (merger or takeover)

how firms grow big

New cards
4

1 financial constraints 2 size of market 3 regulation 4 competition

what stops growth

New cards
5

combination of two or more companies into a single firm

merger

New cards
6

horizontal and vertical

2 types of mergers

New cards
7

a merger that occurs in the same stage of production

horizontal integration

New cards
8

a merger at different stages of the production away from the consumer

backward vertical integration

New cards
9

a merger at different stages of the production closer to the consumer

forward vertical integration

New cards
10

two completely different firms merging

conglomerate integration

New cards
11

1 reduce competition 2 economies of scale 3 monopoly power

advantages of horizontal integration

New cards
12

1 dis economies of scale 2 lack of synergy

disadvantages of horizontal integration

New cards
13

1 control of the supply chain 2 improved access to raw materials

advantages of vertical integration

New cards
14

1 no expertise in the industry 2 lack of synergy

disadvantage of vertical integration

New cards
15

1 reduced risk by diversitification 2 increased consumer base

advantage of conglomerate integration

New cards
16

1 lack of synergy 2 no expertise in the market

disadvantage of conglomerate integration

New cards
17

When a firm splits into two or more independent firms

demergers

New cards
18

1 reduce diseconomies of scale 2 new separate firms can specialise 3 a firm can sell one of its demerged divisions and its assets to increase SNP 4 reduce conflicts between different cultures within a firm

Reasons for demergers

New cards
19

business - in SR, there is cost of administration and in LR high returns so increases AC workers - job losses, increase in managers consumers - impact on price depends on scale of competiton

impacts of demergers

New cards
20

maximising profits

private sector

New cards
21

maximising welfare of citizens

public sector

New cards
22

An organisation whose main objective is not to make money e.g. charity

non profit organisation

New cards
23
<p>price x quantity</p>

price x quantity

total revenue

New cards
24

total revenue increases

elastic good price decreases

New cards
25

total revenue decreases

inelastic good price decreases

New cards
26

total revenue/quantity

average revenue formula

New cards
27

the revenue you receive per unit of output

average revenue

New cards
28

additional revenue received from one extra unit of output

marginal revenue

New cards
29

MC=MR

profit maximisation point

New cards
30

MR=0

revenue maximisation point

New cards
31

AR=AC

sales maximisation point

New cards
32

fixed costs + variable costs

total cost formula

New cards
33

total cost/quantity

average cost formula

New cards
34

(AR-AC) x quantity

profit formula

New cards
35
<p>all factors of production is variable</p>

all factors of production is variable

long run average cost

New cards
36

at least one factor of production is fixed (usually capital)

short run cost curve

New cards
37

an additional factor of production will result in a smaller increase in output

the law of diminishing marginal returns

New cards
38

output increasing as cost per unit decreases

economies of scale

New cards
39

1 managerial 2 financial 3 commercial 4 technical 5 marketing

5 types of economies of scale

New cards
40

employ specialist managers increase division of labour increase efficiency decrease LRAC

managerial EofS

New cards
41

bigger firms are perceived as less risky by financial institutions lower interest rates when taking a loan decrease lRAC

financial EofS

New cards
42

bulk buying decreases LRAC

commercial EofS

New cards
43

specialist capital decreases LRAC

technical EofS

New cards
44

lower unit cost for advertising as the firm expands

marketing EofS

New cards
45

output increases as cost per unit increase

diseconomies of scale

New cards
46

1 lack of motivation 2 loss of coordination 3 poor communication 4 organisational slack

4 types of diseconomies of scale

New cards
47
<p>a firm with a lot of market share so they have price setting power</p>

a firm with a lot of market share so they have price setting power

price maker

New cards
48
<p>firms that accept the market price</p>

firms that accept the market price

price taker

New cards
49

1 no barriers to entry or exit 2 infinite amount of buyers and sellers 3 homogeneous good 4 perfect information

Characteristics of perfect competition

New cards
50

in the SR they make SNP new firms enter the market as profits act as a signal supply increases in the LR firms make no SNP

price takers making profit in the short run

New cards
51

in the SR they make a loss firms leave the market as loss acts as a signal supply decreases in the LR firms make no SNP

price takers making a loss in the short run

New cards
52

AR shifts with the dependants of demand PACIFIC

what shifts AR

New cards
53

AC shifts when fixed costs changes but MC does not AC and MC shifts when variable costs shift

what shift AC

New cards
54

the production of any particular good in the least costly way (lowest point on the AC curve)

productive efficiency

New cards
55

(P=MC)

allocative efficiency

New cards
56

uses SNP to innovate

dynamic efficiency

New cards
57

(any point on the AC curve)

x efficiency

New cards
58

AVC is higher than AR then the firm leaves the market immediately

shut down point

New cards
59

1 low barriers to entry of exit 2 many buyers and sellers 3 slightly differentiated goods 4 firms aim to profit maximise

characteristics of monopolistic competition

New cards
60
<p>SNP acts as a signal new firms enter the market increase in competition increase in AC (marketing) decrease in AR no SNP</p>

SNP acts as a signal new firms enter the market increase in competition increase in AC (marketing) decrease in AR no SNP

firms in monopolistic competition in the LR

New cards
61
<p>1 5 firms have 60% market share 2 high barriers to entry and exit 3 slightly differentiated goods 4 firms aim to profit maximise 5 firms are interdependent</p>

1 5 firms have 60% market share 2 high barriers to entry and exit 3 slightly differentiated goods 4 firms aim to profit maximise 5 firms are interdependent

oligopoly characteristics

New cards
62

high concentration ratio in the market and the demand is inelastic

oligopoly

New cards
63
<p>price rigidity if a firm increases their price, then other firms will not (demand is elastic) if a firm decreases their price, then other firms will decrease prices (demand is inelastic)</p>

price rigidity if a firm increases their price, then other firms will not (demand is elastic) if a firm decreases their price, then other firms will decrease prices (demand is inelastic)

kinked demand curve

New cards
64

two existing firms with high market share engage in price fixing or quality fixing (illegal)

collusion

New cards
65

firms openly speak and cooperates on explicit price fixing

overt collusion

New cards
66

firms indirectly cooperates on price fixing

tacit collusion

New cards
67

1 small number of firms 2 demand is inelastic 3 firms output can be monitored easily 4 incomplete information

collusion characteristics

New cards
68

1 enforcement problems 2 falling market demand 3 successful entry of non cartel firms into the market 4 market regulators 5 whistle blowers

why collusion breaks down

New cards
69
<p>the payoff firms get if they increase price or decrease price</p>

the payoff firms get if they increase price or decrease price

pay off matrix

New cards
70

firms collude and set a high price to gain joint SNP

joint profit maximisation

New cards
71

while colluding a firm could decrease price and break the agreement to gain more SNP while the other firm gain less profit

first movers advantage

New cards
72

one firm supplying the only good or service dominating the market with 100% concentration

pure monopoly

New cards
73

one firm has 25% or more concentration ratio

legal monopoly

New cards
74

one firm has 40% concentration ratio

dominant monopoly

New cards
75

1 one firm in the market 2 high barriers to entry 3 firms aim to profit maximise 4 price setting OR quantity setting power but not both

monopoly characteristics

New cards
76

government - corporation tax, compete on international market worker - increase job security, bonuses and perks consumers - innovation in the market other firms - secure outlet for suppliers, constant quality for firms

benefits of monopoly

New cards
77

government - often avoid tax workers - low bargaining power, low job security (increase in capital) consumers - less choice, higher prices, lower quality other firms - monopsony set low prices for the supplier

costs of monopoly

New cards
78
<p>sunk costs are high so economies of scale is constant</p>

sunk costs are high so economies of scale is constant

natural monopoly

New cards
79
<p>monopolies can discriminate on price on different consumers who have different PED to increase their SNP</p>

monopolies can discriminate on price on different consumers who have different PED to increase their SNP

price discrimination

New cards
80

demand is inelastic demand is irresponsive to a change in price train firms charge higher prices

peak traveller (commuter)

New cards
81

demand is elastic demand is responsive to a change in price train firms charge lower prices

off peak travellers (leisure)

New cards
82

a firm which is the sole buyer of resources or supplies

pure monopsony

New cards
83

firms have some control over their supplier

monopsony power

New cards
84

supplier - secure revenue stream monospony - increase bargaining power consumer -

benefits of monopsony

New cards
85

supplier - reduced bargaining power monopsony - suppliers may shut down consumer -

costs of monopsony

New cards
86

ease of which firms enter or exit the market

contestability

New cards
87

1 low barriers to entry or exit 2 good information 3 low sunk costs

what affects contestability

New cards
88

1 limit pricing or predatory pricing 2 economies of scale and product differentiation 3 patents, copyrights and licensing requirements

types of barriers of entry or exit

New cards
89

1 no physical location 2 consumers can be reached easily 3 brand awareness reaches further 4 disrupting existing markets this increases contestability

technology reducing contestability

New cards
90

the additional quantity of output produced by an additional unit of labour

marginal physical product of labour (MPPL)

New cards
91

the additional revenue received by a firm by using an additional unit of labour

marginal revenue product of labour (MRPL)

New cards
92

MPPL x MR

MRPL formula

New cards
93

each additional unit of labour, brings less additional productivity because capital is fixed

the law of diminishing marginal productivity

New cards
94

labour is homogenous

prefect information

perfect labour mobility

workers and firms are price takers and they must accept the industry wage rate

no barriers to entry or exit

perfectly competitive labour market

New cards
95

there is an inverse relationship between w/r and quantity of labour

how w/r affects demand for labour

New cards
96

when the w/r is low the capital will be substituted for labour as the labour is cheaper

labour substitution

New cards
97

when the w/r is high the labour will be substituted for capital as the capital is cheaper

capital substitution

New cards
98

capital becoming expensive

deregulation

PACIFIC

shifts in the demand for labour curve

New cards
99

the demand of labour is dependant on the demand of the good

derived demand

New cards
100

we cant workout individual productivity as people work in teams

criticism of the law diminishing marginal productivity

New cards

Explore top notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 18 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 4 people
... ago
4.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 11 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 5 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 20 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 22 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 12 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 35255 people
... ago
4.8(98)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards Flashcard (24)
studied byStudied by 2 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (59)
studied byStudied by 10 people
... ago
5.0(2)
flashcards Flashcard (65)
studied byStudied by 27 people
... ago
4.0(3)
flashcards Flashcard (75)
studied byStudied by 6 people
... ago
5.0(2)
flashcards Flashcard (20)
studied byStudied by 43 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (31)
studied byStudied by 22 people
... ago
5.0(2)
flashcards Flashcard (20)
studied byStudied by 4 people
... ago
5.0(3)
flashcards Flashcard (88)
studied byStudied by 73 people
... ago
5.0(2)
robot