Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
Argument from ignorance
a claim must be true (or false) if it hasn’t been fully rejected as false (or proven as true)
Fallacy of the single cause
an outcome is due to one cause when it may be due to multiple causes working together
Golden mean fallacy
the truth is the middle option between two opposites
Cherry picking
picking out the few belief-confirming cases and ignoring the mostly belief-contradicting cases
Argument from anecdote
anecdotes are used as the only evidence
hasty generalization
making a generalization based on insufficient evidence
Appeal to authority
Non-experts or perceived experts are used as evidence
moving the goalposts
Changing the amount/type of evidence needed to support a claim
Conservatism bias
Not revising your beliefs enough when presented with new evidence
Post hoc fallacy
When something appears to cause a later event because it occurred before the later event
Survivorship bias
Focusing on what has passed a selection process (survived), while ignoring what has not
Texas sharpshooter fallacy
In a set of data, ignoring differences and overemphasizing similarities, especially in subsets of the data
Recognition heuristic
If I recognize one thing, but not the other, the one I recognize is better/true
Familiarity heuristic
If I recognize both things, but am more familiar with one, the one I am familiar with is better/true
Availability heuristic
If I can more easily remember examples of something, then it must be more important or happen more often
Affect heuristic
Specific emotions will guide my reasoning
False consensus effect
Thinking more people agree with you than the number that actually do
von Restorff effect
Distinct, different things are remembered more
Extension neglect/base rate fallacy
Sample size is ignored when it should be considered
Availability cascade
Collective beliefs seem more possible/true if repeated
Truthiness
Viewing something as true based on intuition and not evidence
Illusory truth effect
Considering something as true after repeated exposure
Apophenia
Tendency to perceive meaningful patterns and connections between unrelated things
illusory correlation
Perceiving a correlation/ relationship between variables when there is no relationship
Pareidolia
Perceiving a meaningful image in an ambiguous visual stimulus
Mere exposure effect
Liking things more if they have been encountered more
Conformity
Aligning your beliefs and behaviors with others or a specific group
Sunk cost fallacy
the tendency to continue investing in a decision, project, or relationship based on the resources (time, money, effort) already spent, rather than on whether the current investment is likely to yield a positive outcome
ex: Imagine you've spent $200 on tickets for a concert, but on the day of the event, you feel sick. Even though you'd rather stay home, you might feel compelled to go because you don't want the $200 to "go to waste."
Appeal to tradition
Something is true because it fits with traditional/long-standing practices and beliefs
Divine Fallacy
Something must be true because it is too incredible to be false
“I cannot imagine how that ghost sighting can be false, so it must be true!”
Representativeness heuristic
Making categorical judgments about a given person or target based on how closely the exemplar matches the typical or average member of the category
Anchoring bias
When we rely too much on the first piece of information we get (the "anchor") and don't adjust our thinking enough even after getting new information.
For example, if someone tells you a car costs $30,000, that number sticks in your mind as a reference. Even if you find out later that similar cars cost only $25,000, you might still think of $30,000 as a fair price, because the first number you heard has a strong influence on your judgment.
Negative agency bias
Negative outcomes lead us to assume an agent purposefully caused it
Barnum effect
General predictions and personal descriptions tend to be perceived as more specific and personal than they are
"You have a strong desire for others to like and admire you, yet you can be critical of yourself. You have a lot of potential that you haven’t used to your advantage. At times, you may feel insecure about your future."
This description is broad enough to apply to most people, but many might feel it describes them specifically
Egocentricity
Tendency to emphasize our own needs, concerns, and outcomes over those of others
Authority bias
Tendency to believe and be influenced by authority figures, regardless of topic
autokinetic effect
Illusion of seeing a static spot of light moving in a dark room or illusion of movement in a still object
contrast effect
Perception of an intensified difference between two stimuli or sensations when they are juxtaposed or when one immediately follows the other