1/18
attitudes & work behaviour
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Attitude
fairly stable evaluative tendency to respond consistently to something
specific
dont always translate to behaviour
ex. person, obj, situation
Attitude Origin
= influences behaviour towards obj/situation/person/group
belief + value → attitude → behaviour
Attitudes: Organizational Commitment
extent to which individual identifies w org (its goals)
strength of link b/w individual + org
shows probibility of individual remaining w org
3 Types of Organizational Commitment
Affective: strong em attachment to org, stay cause they want to, ↑ w interesting work
Continuance: percieved economic value of remaining w org, stay cause payed well/no better alternatives & feel if quit unable to support families (have to stay)
Normative: feel obligation to stay w org, stay cause they think they should, ↑ = if beneifts/special training
Consequences of Organizational Commitment
all ↓ chance of employees quitting
affective: related to better work performance
continuance: related to worse performance
worse combo for employee/org: ↑ continuance w ↓ affective
downside: unethical/illegal behaviour, family/work life conflict
Attitudes: Job Satisfaction
= collection of attitudes workers have about their jobs
composed of:
facet satisfaction: job components → work itself, compensation, co workers, policy, benefits, working conditions, etc.
overall: gen attitude to job as whole → average of attitudes towards diff facets of job
Determinators of Job Satisfaction
function of
discrepancy b/w job outcomes person wants + those recieved
fairness
dispositional factors
mood/em
Job Satisfaction: Discrepancy Theory
job satisfaction stems from discrepancy b/w job outcomes wanted + outcomes obtained
Job Satisfaction: Fairness
3 types:
distributive (recieve outcomes they think are fair)
procedural (process determining outcome seen as reasonable)
interactional (feel they recieved respectful/informative communication about outcome)
Distributive Fairness- Equity Theory
provides way of understanding how people determine what is fair
ratio: outcomes over inputs = others outcomes over inputs
input= anything people give up/offer/trade to org for outcomes (ex. hours worked, education, work performance)
outcomes= factors org distributes to employees in exchange for their inputs (ex. bonus, recognition, salary)
Consequences of Fairness
less satisfied w job
less motivated to do best
cynical/neg at work
chronic work related stress
intend to look for new job
Job Satisfaction: Dispositional Factors
= factors such as personality (ex. does personality relate to job satisfaction)
research:
identical twins raised apart → similar js
js fairly stable over time
disposition in early adolescence correlated w job satisfaction as mature adult
Dispositional Factors: Personality Traits
↑ js w people who are:
extraverted
↓ neuroticism
↑ self esteem/internal locus of control
optimistic/proactive
Job Satisfaction: Moods & Emotions
events at workplace
em contagion → moods/em spread b/w people in group
em labour → requirement for people to conform to display rules (ex. have to smile)
Determinating Factors of Job Satisfaction
mentally challenging work (makes more satisfying → feels more important)
meaningful work
adequate compensation
career oppurtuinites
people (friendly/helpful coworkers)
Consequences of Job Satisfaction
greater js leads to less:
absence from work
turnover
performance
org citzenship behaviour (voluntary informal behaviour that contributes to org effectiveness)
customer satisfaction/profit
Values
broad tendency to perfer certain states of affiars over others
motivational
Hofstedes Study: Work Related Values
depends on:
power distance: extent to which unequal distribution of power is accepted by society members
uncertantiy avoidance: extent of people being uncomfortable w uncertain/ambigous situations
masculinity/femininity
individualism/collectivisim
long/short term orientation
cultural distance: extent to which cultures differ in values (may not work w countries w great difference)
cultural tightness vs. loosness: more/less strong standards for behaviour
Cultural Intelligence
cabability to func/manage well in culturally diverse environments