Labor's Tactics

__________________________was not accidental. In fact, it was strategic. Labor did not just campaign against the Coalition’s policies; they campaigned against Peter Dutton as a person. The repeated use of his name was not about accountability, it was about association. Albanese and his team worked to paint Dutton as out of touch, dangerous, and unelectable. Instead of challenging his plans, they targeted his persona, turning the election into a referendum not on ideas, but on identity.

That disparity

That disparity _______________. In fact, it was strategic. Labor did not just campaign against the Coalition’s policies; they campaigned against Peter Dutton as a person. The repeated use of his name was not about accountability, it was about association. Albanese and his team worked to paint Dutton as out of touch, dangerous, and unelectable. Instead of challenging his plans, they targeted his persona, turning the election into a referendum not on ideas, but on identity.

was not accidental

That disparity was not accidental. _______________________. Labor did not just campaign against the Coalition’s policies; they campaigned against Peter Dutton as a person. The repeated use of his name was not about accountability, it was about association. Albanese and his team worked to paint Dutton as out of touch, dangerous, and unelectable. Instead of challenging his plans, they targeted his persona, turning the election into a referendum not on ideas, but on identity.

In fact, it was strategic

That disparity was not accidental. In fact, it was strategic.__________________________________________. The repeated use of his name was not about accountability, it was about association. Albanese and his team worked to paint Dutton as out of touch, dangerous, and unelectable. Instead of challenging his plans, they targeted his persona, turning the election into a referendum not on ideas, but on identity.

Labor did not just campaign against the Coalition’s policies; they campaigned against Peter Dutton as a person.

That disparity was not accidental. In fact, it was strategic. Labor did not just campaign against the Coalition’s policies; they campaigned against Peter Dutton as a person. ________________________________________ Albanese and his team worked to paint Dutton as out of touch, dangerous, and unelectable. Instead of challenging his plans, they targeted his persona, turning the election into a referendum not on ideas, but on identity.

The repeated use of his name was not about accountability, it was about association.

That disparity was not accidental. In fact, it was strategic. Labor did not just campaign against the Coalition’s policies; they campaigned against Peter Dutton as a person. The repeated use of his name was not about accountability, it was about association.____________________________________________________________________________. Instead of challenging his plans, they targeted his persona, turning the election into a referendum not on ideas, but on identity.

Albanese and his team worked to paint Dutton as out of touch, dangerous, and unelectable.

That disparity was not accidental. In fact, it was strategic. Labor did not just campaign against the Coalition’s policies; they campaigned against Peter Dutton as a person. The repeated use of his name was not about accountability, it was about association. Albanese and his team worked to paint Dutton as out of touch, dangerous, and unelectable. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Instead of challenging his plans, they targeted his persona, turning the election into a referendum not on ideas, but on identity.