AP gov Ch 6 study guide

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
call with kaiCall with Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/19

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No study sessions yet.

20 Terms

1
New cards

What is the difference between criminal law vs. civil law?

Criminal law punishes people for breaking government rules (like theft), while civil law settles private disputes between people or companies (like a broken contract).

2
New cards

Who is the plaintiff? Who is the defendant?

Plaintiff: person who starts the lawsuit

Defendant: the person being sued or accused

3
New cards

Explain amicus curiae briefs

is a “friend of the court” letter and helps provide extra info to help the judge understand the topic

4
New cards

Example of Amicus Curiae Brief

Example: a random person gets hit by a scooter, they sue the scooter company, bystanders send in a letter saying that scooters on sidewalks are a major hazard for people with canes. Aren’t part of the lawsuit, but they want the judge to know how the ruling will affect their safety.

5
New cards

List the three components of the federal court system, and list the responsibilities of each

District courts: where the case begins

Courts of Appeals: the middle step, don’t hold trial,s they just review the District Court’s work

Supreme Court: at the top of the system, and decides the final ruling

6
New cards

Explain senatorial courtesy

Senatorial courtesy is a custom whereby presidential appointments are confirmed only if there is no objection to them by the senators from the appointee’s state, especially from the senior senator of the president’s party from that state.

7
New cards

List five criteria that have been important when choosing Supreme Court justices over the years

Legal Experience, ideology, age, character, diversity,

8
New cards

What is the rule of 4?

a custom where at least four of the nine Supreme Court justices must vote "yes" for the Court to agree to hear a case.

9
New cards

Opinion

The "winning" paper that explains the new rule everyone must follow.

10
New cards

Dissenting opinion

The "losing" paper written by judges who disagreed and want to explain why they think the majority is wrong.

11
New cards

Concurring opinion

A "yes, but…" paper. A judge agrees with who won, but for a different reason.

12
New cards

Precedent

Using past court decisions as a guide for current cases. (Like following a recipe that worked before).

13
New cards

Judicial activism

When judges play an active role in policy-making to fix social issues (often "reading between the lines" of the Constitution).

14
New cards

Judicial Restraint

When judges play it safe. They only strike down laws that obviously violate the Constitution and leave the big changes to Congress.

15
New cards

Marbury v. Madison

The case that gave the Supreme Court its "superpower"—Judicial Review (the power to cancel any law they find unconstitutional).

16
New cards

Judicial implementation (give one example also)

The Court’s biggest problem: they make the rules, but they have no "police" to make people follow them.

Example: When the Court ruled that segregated schools were illegal (Brown v. Board), many southern states simply ignored them until the President sent the military to force the schools to open.

17
New cards

warren court

“Most liberal court ever.”

  • Active in civil rights and civil liberties

  • 1953-1969

  • Brown v. Board of Ed

  • gideon v wainwright 

  • miranda v arizona

  • activism

18
New cards

Burger Court

  • conservative ideology, narrowed defendant rights

  • 1969-1986

  • US vs Nixon

  • Regents of the University of California v Bakke

  • Restraint

19
New cards

Rehnquist Court

  • Limit earlier decisions of liberal courts

  • 1986-2005

  • planned parenthood v casey

  • bush v gore

  • restraint

20
New cards

Robert’s Court

  • John Roberts is the current Chief Justice

  • More conservative than Rehnquist

  • 2005-present

  • Citizens v fec

  • Dobbs v Jackson

  • activisim