1/58
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
___: Simple interactions, constituent parts, biological and environmental
Reductionism
___: Complex interactions, characteristics exclusive to the whole
Holism
___: Can choose, in control, factors within control, responsible
Freewill
___: Cannot choose, no control, factors outside control, not responsible
Determinism
___: Inherited, Genetic, unaffected by experience, before birth
Nature
___: Learned, upbringing, experience, after birth
Nurture
___: Internal, consistent traits and characteristics
Individual disposition
___: External, current circumstance and environment
Situation
__ Strengths:
Easier to control, establish cause and effect
Easier to find objective evidence
Reductionism
__ Weaknesses:
Not appropriate for humans
Lacks face validity
Problem of infinite regress
Reductionism
__ Strengths:
More face validity
No problem of infinite regress
Appropriate for humans
Holism
__ Weaknesses:
Harder to find objective evidence
Harder to establish cause an effect
Holism
__ Strengths:
Recognises differences in free will
Motivates individuals to change
Freewill
__ Weaknesses:
Harder to establish cause and effect
Implies blame
Freewill
__ Strengths:
Can establish cause and effect
Individuals aren’t blamed
Practical application
Determinism
__ Weaknesses:
Ignores differences in freewill
Excuses not to change
Determinism
__ Strengths:
Practical: plan interventions
Individuals aren’t to blame for there inherited characteristics
Nature
__ Weaknesses:
No motivation to improve
Likely to be interaction
Harder to change nature
Nature
__ Strengths:
Practical: plan how to raise
Individuals aren’t blamed
Easier to change nurture
__ Weaknesses:
No motivation to improve
Likely to be interaction
Nurture
__ Strengths:
In line with societies view of behaviour
Practical: Predict/manage behaviour
Individual disposition
__ Weaknesses:
Harder to manipulate and study individual disposition
Ignores differences in free will
Individual disposition
__ Strengths:
Easier to manipulate situation
Practical: Manipulate and influence behaviour
Situation
__ Weaknesses:
Less in line with societies views
Ignores differences in free will
Situation
SCIENCE: __: variable influences another
Cause and effect
SCIENCE: __: repeating consistently same result
Replicable
SCIENCE: __: predicting testable relationships
Hypothesis testing
SCIENCE: __: Intervening and changing
Manipulation of variables
SCIENCE: __: Extraneous variables same
Control and standardisation
SCIENCE: __: Numerical data
Quantifiable measurements
SCIENCE: __: Potentially refuted by evidence
Falsifiable
SCIENCE: __: Supporting general theory with specific evidence
Induction
SCIENCE: __: predicting specific evidence from general theory
Deduction
SCIENCE: __: Factual, no opinion or interpretation
Objective
USEFULNESS: __: measuring intended, generalisable
Validity
USEFULNESS: __: improve pro social, functional, healthy
Practical application
USEFULNESS: __: Change over time, development
Longitudinal vs snapshot
USEFULNESS: __: discover correct position, unlikely to concede
Supports debate vs unsolvable debate
SOCIALLY SENSITIVE: __: implications law policy, public mistrust
Political consequences
SOCIALLY SENSITIVE: __: Funding suspicion, anger institutions
Institutional context
SOCIALLY SENSITIVE: __: Groups individuals negative perception
Stigma
ETHNOCENTRISM: __: assumptions other populations are the same
Cultural location
ETHNOCENTRISM: __: Assuming physical props similar
Materials
ETHNOCENTRISM: __: Assume manifest same
Operationalisationc of constructs
BIAS: __: beliefs and opinions affect results
Researcher bias
BIAS: __: Interpretations affect counting and describing
Observer bias
BIAS: __: Assuming culture
Ethnocentric bias
BIAS: __: characteristics more likely selected
Sampling bias
BIAS: __: over representative one ethnicity
Culture bias
BIAS: __: Over represented one gender
Gender bias
__ Strengths:
Lacks bias
More valid/reliable
Practical cause and effect
Science
__ Weaknesses:
Reductionism weakness
Unrealistic environments
Science
__ Strengths:
More participants
Funding
Replication
Usefulness
__ Strengths:
Solve debates
Practical benefits
Greater good
Socially sensitive
__ Weaknesses:
Less participants
Funding
Replication
Socially sensitive
__ Weakness:
Lower validity
Ethnocentrism
__ discussions:
Diverse researchers
Objectivity
Cultural relativism
Understand: avoid, improve society
Ethnocentrism
__ Weaknesses:
Lower population validity
Less useful
Ethnocentrism
Less scientific induction
Bias
__ Why:
Target population
Ethical study
Practicality
Study humans
Human error
Bias