Intro to Criminal Law

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall with Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/40

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No study sessions yet.

41 Terms

1
New cards

The Principle of Necessity

Immediate necessity justifies choosing to commit a lesser crime to avoid the harm of the greater crime.

2
New cards

Elements of Necessity

  • Identify the evils 

  • Rank the evils 

  • Choose the lesser evil to avoid the greater evil that's on the verge of happening (imminent). Must reasonably believe that the only choice is to cause the lesser evil 

3
New cards

Consent

Rooted in the high value our society places on personal freedom.

4
New cards

4 Exceptions of Consent

  • No serious injuries result from the consensual crime.  

  • Injury that happens during a sporting event. 

  • Conduct that benefits the consenting person. Such as a doctor performing surgery. 

  • The consent is to sexual conduct.

5
New cards

3 additional requirements for Consent

  • Voluntary consent

  • Knowing consent

  • Authorized consent

6
New cards

Insanity

A defense based on defendant mental disease or defect.

7
New cards

4 tests of Insanity

  1. M’Nagthen Rule

  2. Product - of - Mental - Illness test

  3. Irresistible Impulse Test

  4. Substantial Capacity Test

8
New cards

John Hinckley

attempted to assassinate President Reagan to catch a girl's attention that he was obsessed with and had a crush on.

9
New cards

Age

1. Under 7 - no criminal capacity to commit crimes. 

2. 7-14 is presumed to have no criminal capacity, but that presumption can be overcome. 

3. Over 14  - same capacity as adults.

10
New cards

Voluntary vs. Involuntary Intoxication

Involuntary intoxication is an excuse for criminal liability in all states. 

Voluntary intoxication is not an excuse.

11
New cards

  Duress

Not responsible because they were threatened with if the crime was not committed

(coercion)

12
New cards

Elements of Duress

  • Threats amounting to duress 

  • Immediacy of harm 

  • Crimes this defense applies to varies 

  • Degrees of belief regarding the threat (varies depending on the jurisdiction)

13
New cards

 Oliver/DePasquale case

Ernset Oliver was arrested by 3 policemen who undertook a "decoy operation”

They baited him with $10.

14
New cards

KRL case

The kid who chopped up the fish on the counter for someone to see.

15
New cards

Vicarious Liability

holding someone criminally liable for the conduct of another. 

 when 1 person is liable for someone else crimes 

16
New cards

Complicity

When the defendant’s role in criminal act began

17
New cards

Parties to a Crime

a. Accomplices - Participants before and/or during the commission of crime.

       b. Accessories - participants after the crime had been committed.

      c. Principals - the one who actually commits the object crime.

18
New cards

Accomplices

Rule that conspiracy to commit a crime and the crime itself are 2 separate crimes. 

19
New cards

Accessory

Participants after the crime has been committed are also known as obstruction of justice interfering. A lesser offense known as misdemeanor. 

20
New cards

Inchoate Crimes

Imposing criminal liability for crimes that have not been completed. 

21
New cards

Attempt for Inchoate Crimes

  • Intent or purpose to commit a specific crime 

  • Act(s) to carry out that intent

22
New cards

Impossibility

a.  legal impossibility:

The defendant intends to commit a crime, does everything he can to complete the crime, but what he intends to do isn’t a crime.  2: Can be a defense to criminal attempts. 3: rationale we don’t want to punish people

b.  factual impossibility:

Intends to commit a crime and takes all the states necessary to complete it but a fact makes it impossible to complete. 2: Not a defense to criminal attempt. 3: Rationale bent on breaking the law to go free due to a stroke of good luck.

23
New cards

Conspiracy

2 or more people coming into agreement to commit a crime.

24
New cards

Elements to Conspiracy

Agreements/Act + Specific Intent

25
New cards

Solicitation

Asking or encouraging another to commit a crime

26
New cards

Elements to Solicition

Actus Reus + Mens Rea

27
New cards

Murder

The killing of a person by another person.

28
New cards

Types of Murders

Willful, deliberate premeditated – intent to kill murders

Felony murders - can be second degree murders

29
New cards

 Second Degree Murder

Developed out of desire to reserve capital punishment for only the most deserving 

30
New cards

Felony Murder

Some states this is a first degree murder. The most serious type of murder. 

31
New cards

Elements to Felony Murder

  1)Third party exception: Victim Expection 

Someone other than the parties of the crime, kills another, the defendant would be liable for any deaths that occur during the commission of a felony.

2)  Resisting-victim exception  

If a death occurs in the course of the victims resisting the attack. The  defendant could be liable for that death.

32
New cards

Manslaughter

The unlawful killing of another that occurs voluntarily due to sudden heat of passion or involuntarily where there was no intent to do any harm.

33
New cards

Voluntary Manslaughter 

Killing could have occurred after a cooling off period.

34
New cards

Adequate provocation

The trigger that sets off the sudden killing of another person. 

35
New cards

4 common law provocations

  • Mutual combat (fighting)

  • Assault and Battery 

  • Trespass 

  • Adultery

36
New cards

Involuntary Manslaughter

The killing of another person unintentionally.

37
New cards

 2 types of Involuntary Manslaughter

  • Criminal negligence manslaughter 

  • Unlawful act manslaughter

38
New cards

M’Nagthen Rule

“ The Right - Wrong Test” - This mental disease or defect caused the defendant to not know either : The nature and quality of their actions, what he/ she was doing wrong, simple awareness.

39
New cards

Product of Mental Illness test

- “The Durham Test” - Acts that are the “products” of mental illness or disease excuse criminal liability.

40
New cards

Irresistible Impulse Test

Volitional Capacity Test - If the defendant knew what he was doing was wrong, was he able to resist the urge to commit the act?  Did the defendant know right from wrong? 

41
New cards

Substantial Capacity Test

A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of the crime such  conduct as a result of mental disease or defect, he lacks substantial capacity either to 1: appreciate the criminality (wrongfulness) of this conduct. 2: to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law.Â