1/40
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
The Principle of Necessity
Immediate necessity justifies choosing to commit a lesser crime to avoid the harm of the greater crime.
Elements of Necessity
Identify the evilsÂ
Rank the evilsÂ
Choose the lesser evil to avoid the greater evil that's on the verge of happening (imminent). Must reasonably believe that the only choice is to cause the lesser evilÂ
Consent
Rooted in the high value our society places on personal freedom.
4 Exceptions of Consent
No serious injuries result from the consensual crime. Â
Injury that happens during a sporting event.Â
Conduct that benefits the consenting person. Such as a doctor performing surgery.Â
The consent is to sexual conduct.
3 additional requirements for Consent
Voluntary consent
Knowing consent
Authorized consent
Insanity
A defense based on defendant mental disease or defect.
4 tests of Insanity
M’Nagthen Rule
Product - of - Mental - Illness test
Irresistible Impulse Test
Substantial Capacity Test
John Hinckley
attempted to assassinate President Reagan to catch a girl's attention that he was obsessed with and had a crush on.
Age
1. Under 7 - no criminal capacity to commit crimes.Â
2. 7-14 is presumed to have no criminal capacity, but that presumption can be overcome.Â
3. Over 14Â - same capacity as adults.
Voluntary vs. Involuntary Intoxication
Involuntary intoxication is an excuse for criminal liability in all states.Â
Voluntary intoxication is not an excuse.
  Duress
Not responsible because they were threatened with if the crime was not committed
(coercion)
Elements of Duress
Threats amounting to duressÂ
Immediacy of harmÂ
Crimes this defense applies to variesÂ
Degrees of belief regarding the threat (varies depending on the jurisdiction)
 Oliver/DePasquale case
Ernset Oliver was arrested by 3 policemen who undertook a "decoy operation”
They baited him with $10.
KRL case
The kid who chopped up the fish on the counter for someone to see.
Vicarious Liability
holding someone criminally liable for the conduct of another.Â
 when 1 person is liable for someone else crimesÂ
Complicity
When the defendant’s role in criminal act began
Parties to a Crime
a. Accomplices - Participants before and/or during the commission of crime.
       b. Accessories - participants after the crime had been committed.
   c. Principals - the one who actually commits the object crime.
Accomplices
Rule that conspiracy to commit a crime and the crime itself are 2 separate crimes.Â
Accessory
Participants after the crime has been committed are also known as obstruction of justice interfering. A lesser offense known as misdemeanor.Â
Inchoate Crimes
Imposing criminal liability for crimes that have not been completed.Â
Attempt for Inchoate Crimes
Intent or purpose to commit a specific crimeÂ
Act(s) to carry out that intent
Impossibility
a. legal impossibility:
The defendant intends to commit a crime, does everything he can to complete the crime, but what he intends to do isn’t a crime. 2: Can be a defense to criminal attempts. 3: rationale we don’t want to punish people
b. factual impossibility:
Intends to commit a crime and takes all the states necessary to complete it but a fact makes it impossible to complete. 2: Not a defense to criminal attempt. 3: Rationale bent on breaking the law to go free due to a stroke of good luck.
Conspiracy
2 or more people coming into agreement to commit a crime.
Elements to Conspiracy
Agreements/Act + Specific Intent
Solicitation
Asking or encouraging another to commit a crime
Elements to Solicition
Actus Reus + Mens Rea
Murder
The killing of a person by another person.
Types of Murders
Willful, deliberate premeditated – intent to kill murders
Felony murders - can be second degree murders
 Second Degree Murder
Developed out of desire to reserve capital punishment for only the most deservingÂ
Felony Murder
Some states this is a first degree murder. The most serious type of murder.Â
Elements to Felony Murder
  1)Third party exception: Victim ExpectionÂ
Someone other than the parties of the crime, kills another, the defendant would be liable for any deaths that occur during the commission of a felony.
2) Resisting-victim exception Â
If a death occurs in the course of the victims resisting the attack. The defendant could be liable for that death.
Manslaughter
The unlawful killing of another that occurs voluntarily due to sudden heat of passion or involuntarily where there was no intent to do any harm.
Voluntary ManslaughterÂ
Killing could have occurred after a cooling off period.
Adequate provocation
The trigger that sets off the sudden killing of another person.Â
4 common law provocations
Mutual combat (fighting)
Assault and BatteryÂ
TrespassÂ
Adultery
Involuntary Manslaughter
The killing of another person unintentionally.
 2 types of Involuntary Manslaughter
Criminal negligence manslaughterÂ
Unlawful act manslaughter
M’Nagthen Rule
“ The Right - Wrong Test” - This mental disease or defect caused the defendant to not know either : The nature and quality of their actions, what he/ she was doing wrong, simple awareness.
Product of Mental Illness test
- “The Durham Test” - Acts that are the “products” of mental illness or disease excuse criminal liability.
Irresistible Impulse Test
Volitional Capacity Test - If the defendant knew what he was doing was wrong, was he able to resist the urge to commit the act? Did the defendant know right from wrong?Â
Substantial Capacity Test
A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of the crime such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect, he lacks substantial capacity either to 1: appreciate the criminality (wrongfulness) of this conduct. 2: to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law.Â