1/37
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Japan: TFR 2024
TFR 2024 = 1.37, far below replacement.
Japan: Mean age at first birth
Mean age at first birth in 2022 = 32.2.
Japan: Causes of fertility decline
Age at marriage rising; unstable jobs; unattractive marriage package; rising childrearing costs.
Japan: Longevity 2024
Males 81.1, Females 87.14, overall 85.15 years.
Japan: Natural change 2022
Natural change = -4.6 per 1,000 population.
Japan: Population structure 2024
0–14: 11.1%, 15–64: 59.6%, 65+: 29.3%.
Japan: 2050 elderly projection
Elderly share projected to exceed 38% by 2050.
Japan: Speed of ageing
Japan aged from 7%→14% elderly in just 24 years.
Japan: Migration impact
Only ~1.8% of population are migrants; rules tight; small demographic effect.
Key insight on Japan ageing
Japan shows ultra-rapid ageing → higher fiscal costs, pension shortages, care shortages, slow growth, fewer young workers.
Singapore: TFR 2024
TFR 2024 = 0.97, among the world’s lowest.
Singapore: Life expectancy 2024
Life expectancy 84.19 (M: 82.3, F: 86.5).
Singapore: Old-age support ratio
Support ratio fell from 13.5 (1970) to 3.5 (2024).
Singapore: Median age trends
Median age rose from 19.5 (1970) → 42.8 (2024).
Singapore: Drivers of ageing
Declining TFR, rising life expectancy, insufficient migrants.
Singapore: Demographic challenge
900k+ baby boomers turning 65 since 2012; resident labour force shrinking; migration restrictions since 2013 worsen outlook.
Global ageing: Who ages fastest?
Developed countries age fastest; by 2050, 1 in 4.5 will be 60+; support ratio falls from 12→4.
Global ageing: Developing countries
Developing countries face compressed transitions, giving little time to adjust.
Ageing within elderly population
80+ group grows far faster than 60+; 80+ rises from 86m (2005) to 394m (2050).
Ageing within workforce
Share of 50+ workers rises; by 2050 older workers dominate; fewer young workers.
Ageing and labour force growth
Ageing shrinks working-age population and lowers LFPR of elderly; Japan/Germany negative LF growth; ASEAN/India/LatAm healthy.
DTM: Stage 1
High fertility & mortality; small stable population.
DTM: Stage 2
Mortality falls; fertility remains high; population boom.
DTM: Stage 3
Fertility declines due to urbanisation, education, female labour force; growth slows.
DTM: Stage 4
Low fertility & mortality; population stabilises but older.
DTM: Stage 5
Ultra-low fertility; population begins to decline.
Demographic dividend concept
Declining fertility temporarily creates favourable age structure with more workers per dependent.
Dividend mechanism: labour
Fewer children → higher female labour force participation, but requires job creation.
Dividend mechanism: savings
Fewer dependents → higher savings → investment.
Dividend mechanism: human capital
Fewer children → more resources per child → higher human capital.
East Asia miracle growth
1965–1990: per capita income >6% annually; demographic transition explained 25–40%.
Critical insight on demographic dividend
Dividend is temporary; low fertility eventually creates a demographic tax.
Lutz (2010): Reasons for fertility decline
Decline due to fewer potential mothers, changing norms and ideal family size, higher aspirations & income uncertainty.
Lutz: Immigration & ageing
Immigration cannot stop ageing; only slow it.
Lutz: Education & population size
Education/human capital can offset smaller populations; optimal TFR can be <2 with high human capital.
Mamolo & Scherbov: Why new measures
Chronological age measures ignore changing health/longevity conditions.
Mamolo & Scherbov: RLE15
RLE15 = share of population with <15 years of remaining life.
Mamolo & Scherbov: Implication of rising life expectancy
With longer life expectancy, ageing may be less severe than traditional chronological measures imply.