EM- Law Enforcement
CHANGE: law enforcement
nightwatchmen
sergeants
thief takers
role of nightwatchmen
employed in larger towns to patrol streets day and night
thief takers
carried lamp and ringed bell to warn people to go home
factors for nightwatchmen
population increase as more crimes being committed and need for widespread law enforcement
what did sergeants do
employed in towns to enforce market regulations by weighing goods and collecting fines from traders behaving badly
how and when did sergeants became known as Charlies
1663- Charles II set up a force of paid watchmen to patrol the streets in all towns and cities
why were sergeants not respected
became objects of fun and children baited them
factors for change of sergeants
economic growth
role of king
how was economic growth a factor for change of sergeants
more people in a town meant more merchants as more people to buy goods; sergeant needed to manage this
what did thief takers do
was paid a reward for catching a criminal and delivering them to the law
why were thief takers used
constables and watchmen weren't effective at hunting criminals
what was wrong with thief takers
open to corruption so not very effective
factors for change of thief takers
increased population- more people committing crime
CONTINUITY: law enforcement
hue and cry
parish constables
ordinary people and community
JPs
CHANGE: hue and cry
constables now led the hue and cry
parish constables role
dealt mainly with every day crimes and had power to inflict minor punishment (e.g. whipping vagabonds)
to ensure suspects were held in prison
who were parish constables and what did they look like
had no weapons or uniform
part time job
change in community law enforcement
if someone robbed, they had to get an arrest warrant from a magistrate, track down the criminal and deliver them to constable
CHANGE: JPs
during Tudor Period they became key to local law enforcement
who took the role of JP
someone of importance locally, like wealthy landowner, who took job for prestige
role of JP
judged manor court cases
could fine people
send them to stocks/pillory
order whippings
CHANGE: trial
manor courts
benefit of the clergy removed
Habeus Corpus act
what are manor courts
run by JPs, dealt with minor crimes
what was changed about the benefit of the clergy
couldn't be claimed for more serious crimes
why was benefit of the clergy changed
too many could claim it due to literacy rates increasing
factors for change of benefit of clergy
education increase
wealth increase
how is education increase a factor for change of benefit of clergy
more people literate so they had to change law to be fair so people didn't just claim it for lesser punishment
how is wealth increase a factor for the change of benefit of clergy
more people have money to be able to afford education and more money is being put into education
when was Habeus Corpus Act
1679
what did the Habeus Corpus act do
prevented authorities from locking a person up indefinitely without charge
once arrested, had to appear in court within certain time or be released
hindrance of Habeus Corpus Act
officials would make up evidence at trials to lock up critics or opposition
factors for change of Habeus Corpus Act
role of government
changing opinions- realised the previous system flawed and therefore tried to fix it
CONTINUITY: Trials
most cases dealt with locally but made more efficient
changing opinions- realised the previous system flawed and therefore tried to fix it
twice a year county Assizes (royal judge) visited each county to deal with serious offences
church courts- dealt with crimes committed by churchmen or those with benefit of clergy