1/26
ETC1000
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Convenience Sampling - Definitions
,Selecting individuals who are easiest to access
Convenience Sampling
Sample is drawn from a group that is conveniently available
Convenience Sampling - Pros
Quick easy and inexpensive
Convenience Sampling - Cons
High risk of bias not representative
Simple Random Sampling - Definition,
Every individual in the population has an equal chance of being selected
Simple Random Sampling - How It Works
,Use random methods (e.g. random number generator) to select participants
Simple Random Sampling - Pros,
Minimizes selection bias easy to analyze
Simple Random Sampling - Cons,s
Can be impractical for large or dispersed population
Systematic Sampling - Definition,
Selecting every kth individual from a list
Systematic Sampling - How It Works,
Choose a random starting point then select every kth member
Systematic Sampling - Pros,
Simple to implement evenly spread
Systematic Sampling - Cons
,May introduce bias if there's a hidden pattern in the population
Cluster Sampling - Definition
Dividing population into clusters randomly selecting clusters then sampling all or some within them
Cluster Sampling - How It Works,
Randomly select entire groups (clusters) often based on geography
Cluster Sampling - Pros,
Cost-effective useful for large populations
Cluster Sampling - Cons,
Higher sampling error if clusters are not homogeneous
Stratified Sampling - Definition
,Dividing population into subgroups (strata) and sampling from each
Stratified Sampling - How It Works,
Population is divided into strata (e.g. age gender) and random samples taken from each
Stratified Sampling - Pros,
Ensures representation of key subgroups
Stratified Sampling - Cons
,Requires knowledge of population structure and strata
Sampling bias
Some members of the target population are less likely to be included than others
Attrition bias
,Participants who drop out of a study are different from the ones who remain
Volunteer bias,
Participants who choose to participate in studies are generally different to those who do not
Survivorship bias
,Successful observations are more likely to be represented than unsuccessful ones
Non-response bias,
Participants who refuse to participate or drop out of a study may be different to those who take part
Undercoverage bias
,Participants who are inadequately represented