1/41
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Consumer culture
a form of material culture facilitated by the market which thus creates a particular relationship between the consumer and the goods or services he or she uses or consumers
Why do we over consume as a culture?
Cultural reasons: attitudes, beliefs, values
Materialistic, Capitalistic, affluent
the weather the country, the more its people consume
We are exposed to approximately 5,000 - 8,000 ads a day
Advertisers tempt, shape and create consumerism and needs where there once were none
What we buy helps us shape our social identity and social relationships, bonding over shared preferences
“keep up with the Joneses” mentality
What’s your consumption factor?
US consumes 5X our fair share of world’s resources based on population
-First world average consumption rate of resources and production of waste 32X higher than developing world
-Increasing population is a problem in terms of consumption and production
Consumption of resources = oil and metals
production of wastes = plastics and greenhouse gases (GHG)
Developing countries consumption
developing countries make up the largest percentage of the world’s population and strive to achieve a first world lifestyle
competition for resources
Argument: if we are the model for developing countries, show we stay on this path or cut back our consumption and let developing countries catch up?
India/China- 1/3 world’s population, SOL quickly rising, resource demand rising
China alone catching up to U.S. in consumption would double world consumption rates. India would triple it.
If all of the developing world caught up to the U.S. consumption rate, it would increase the world consumption rate eleven-fold as if population increased to 72B
Consumption, happiness, and quality of life
Standard of Living (SOL) is not couples with consumption rates
-Research shows buying stuff does not always make us happier or contribute to a higher SOL
In U.S. consumption high, SOL high, happiness lower
In Western Europe consumption lower, SOL higher, happiness higher
Household Consumption
US has highest per capital carbon footprint 18.6 tonnes CO2 equivalent vs, global average 2.4 tonnes CO2 per capita
In 2007, China surpassed US in GHG emissions, but environmental footprint is small due to exports of products
responsibility on consumer not producer
-Consumers are responsible for 60% global GHG emissions and up to 80% global water use
-20% carbon impacts
driving cars and heating homes
-4/5 of the impacts are “secondary"
the environmental effects from producing the goods and services that we buy
water use
-More than HH consumption, water is used to produce products we buy
-beef requires large amounts of water to produce
Consumption
using up of a resource
-uses up resources and creates carbon emissions and other wastes
Americans
are over-consumers
Psychology, Advertising and Consumption
-overconsumption- not entirely our fault
-Psychological manipulation by advertising marketing firms to sell products
Perceived Obsolescence
convinces us we need newer, bigger, better products and to throw away what’s sill good
ex: cars, clothing trends, trends of new technology
Planned Obsolescence
intentionally designing a product with limited useful life so we purchase it again
ex: jeans, iPhones
Ecological Transparency of Products
in the retail world…
-Advertising and psychology linked
-Psychologists study power of perception
eco-angst- eco anxiety → worry about the environment, climate change planetary issues
greenwashing- eco anxiety is alleviated through greenwashing →advertising to be better for the environment
contrast effect
Power of Perceptions
perceptions: a way of regarding, understanding, or interpreting something, not always based on factual information
Examples: Bargain bin cabernets thought to be expensive people like it more, linger longer over dinner, food taste better, heightened brain activity, neurons fire
-Brain imagining reveals “neutral signatures” show happiness or disgust
→Opposite results if told wine is cheap
-Difference lies in perception, not reality
Eco-angst
the moment we discover some piece of unpleased ecological information about a product we bought causing us a moment of despair about the planet’s condition and our place in it
Greenwashing
purposely advertising ONE virtue about a products ecological benefits and conveniently leaving out the many negative environmental impacts caused by the product.
example: organic cotton T-shirts impresses - positive single virtue
Negative not mentioned-abundance of water necessary ti grow cotton in an arid region, workers exposed to potentially toxic dyes, harmful working conditions for women in factories
Contrast Effect
eye-opening data that comes about at the moment we’re comparing two brands
-stores, apps, and websites are providing new information systems giving detailed evaluations of once-hidden ecological impacts of products
-as environmental awareness increases, we are assessing our choices
-having this information affects our choices
Benefits
-this information gives us the ability to make better decisions and change our behavior (consumption habits) for better ecological quality
-information makes consumers more aware - choose brands without downsides
-allows us to vote with dollars and tip the market share towards ecologically safer products
Story of Stuff
Impacts of Consumerism
illustrates the interrelationships and connections between environment, culture, population, and resource use
-important because our consumption habits in the U.S. can have far-reaching effect on people and environments around the world!
Externalities: hidden cost not reflected in the price of a product - keeps prices low
Linear system of material economy: where our stuff comes from and where it goes
Extraction - transportation - manufacturing- distribution - consumer use - disposal
Externalities
hidden cost not reflected in the price of a product - keeps prices low
Linear System of Material Economy
where our stuff comes from and where it goes
Industry responds to changing consumer preference or what happens when you vote with your $$
as society expresses greater concern for the environment, industries and businesses In turn are becoming more aware and they are beginning to evaluate how their products and activities impact the environment
-some are providing “green products” and “green”processes”
-in order to minimize the affect of products on the environment Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is being used by many companies
Life Cycle Assessment
an analysis took designed to identify and evaluate the cumulative environmental impacts of a product during its lifetime LCA uses a “cradle to grave” or “cradle to cradle” approach
Industrial Ecology/Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
-LCA evaluates all stages of a product’s life from
the extraction of raw material from the earth, transportation/distribution, manufacturing/production, consumer use and product disposal or reuse into a new product
-Often are not considered in traditional analysis
-Provides a more comprehensive and accurate view of the true environmental trade-offs (an exchange, choosing one thing to get another) in product or process selection
Life Cycle Assessment identifies and measures…
-inputs (raw material, energy, water)
-outputs (atmospheric emissions, water pollution, soils waste)
-externalities (hidden costs of production and consumption not borne by consumer or industry, not reflected in the price )
associated with a product or service over its lifetime to disposal or reuse
LCA process
Life Cycle Assessment
Cradle to cradle/cradle to grave
Products Life
the extraction of raw material from the earth
transportation/distribution→air, ships, railways, trucks,piplines
manufacturing/production
transportation/distribution
consumer use
product disposal or reuse→trash cans, waste yards
into new product
LCA Framework:
1.Goal Definition and Scoping
Where does it start and where does it end?
-define the product, process or activity
-identify the boundaries - decide how far you want to take it back, draw a line, and the justify it
LCA Framework:
2.Inventory Analysis
Identify and quantify:
(inputs) - Materials usage
energy
water
raw materials
(Outputs) - Environmental releases during each phase
air emissions
solid waste disposal
waterborne waste
other releases
LCA Framework:
3.Impact Assessment
-Assess the potential human and ecological effects of energy, water, and raw materials usage (inputs)
-Translate the environmental releases (outputs) identified into assessments such as:
Climate change/GHG emissions, toxic emissions, over-fertilization, ozone depletion, energy consumption, use of resources, environmental disruption, deforestation
(externalities) health and safety risks to workers, animals, habitat destruction, loss of biodiversity, displacement of people
LCA Framework:
4. interpretation
evaluate the results and identify your options
-methods and measures used in LCA are science-based, however the interpretation of impact results requires the use of value judgements and cannot be based solely on natural science
-Important- LCA I used to make comparisons between 2 products, not decisions about which to buy (decisions analysis)
can lead to finding solutions that would otherwise have been ignored
can provide options for change such as:
trade-offs, product improvement, improve decisions making, policy making, supply chain management, marketing, etc.
Limitations of LCA
an be resource and time intensive
Depending on thoroughness and detail desired:
gathering data and availability of data can be problematic
will not determine which product is best or which to buy
good for making comparisons between products, not decisions
Benefits of LCA
identifies and considers externalities in assessment
can help decision-makers compare the product or process that results in the least impact to the environment, human health, and safety, and well-being
can be combined with other data or types of analysis (i.e., cost/benefit analysis, decision analysis ) in order to choose a product or process
identifies where it is possible to transfer environmental impacts
eliminating air emissions by creating wastewater discharge
decisions-makers can fully consider the environmental trade-offs (an exchange, choosing one thing to get another) associated with a product or process
LCA Levi Jeans - stages of life
stage 1 Extraction: Cotton production
inputs
raw material- cotton grown in China, India, and U.S, Pakistan, Turkey 40 M farmers, 290M farm workers
<5% sources from other cotton - a % is from animals
Energy - fossil fuels (machinery, chemical inputs)
water - irrigation
Outputs- Emissions
carbon emissions - fossil fuel intensive
water-borne waste, pollution - chemicals, fertilizers into waterways, water intensive
Externalities
Health and safety impacts of farm workers- labor intensive, exposure t chemicals - pesticides, herbicides, etc
fair and safe working conditions?
living wages and salaries?
health insurance?
Health and safety to animals - animal safety issues, toxic chemical to wildlife
adherence to Animal Welfare Policy?
Environmental Impacts -
land pollution - soil degradation from chemicals
water pollution - -contamination of drinking water sources (algae blooms)
Air pollution - GHG emissions
LCA Levi Jeans - stages of life
Stage 2 - Production
Fabric production - -manufacturing textile - turning cotton into a usable form
fabric mills and dye houses - largest in Mexico
Uses resources in process - water, oil, chemical dyes
Outputs -emissions
land, air pollution, water-borne, soil waste
Externalities
health and safety of workers - exposure to chemicals, dyes, working conditions
impacts - air, water pollution, impacts oto wildlife and people
LCA Levi Jeans - stages of life
Stage 3 - Manufacturing
garment manufacturing - making the fabric into jeans
inputs
water and energy required for process
outputs (releases)
air, water, land emissions
Externalities
thousands of workers needed- product suppliers from around the world
are they interested in labor, health, safety and environmental issues?
Working conditions in the factories - health and safety concerns
do factory owners support unions and labor laws?
is there a comprehensive workplace code?
forced child labor?
wages and salary?
Environmental impacts from air and water pollution, impacts to wildlife
LCA Levi Jeans - stages of life
Stage 4 Distribution/Transportation (global Impacts)
Inputs
fossil fuel for vehicles
energy to power warehouses and retail stores and selling jeans
resources used ti label jeans - creating tags, printing information on tags
transporting finished products (Levi jeans) to distribution warehouses and retail stores around the world
if arriving from outside the U.S. can be done by air and truck, rail and container ships→once in U.S. can be combination of light rail and truck
Outputs
carbon emissions from vehicles
retain stores and warehouses - heating/cooling/lighting, solid waste
Externalities
carbon emissions into air → contributed to global warming
solid waste disposal impacts people - emissions from incinerator, leachate, from landfills
working conditions
do workers receive health insurance ?
are they being paid livable wages?
LCA Levi Jeans - stages of life
Stage 5 - Consumer use
Levi reports-
during the consumer use phase - Washing and drying jeans, 58% of the energy and 45% of the water used during the lifetime of the jeans occurs
to be more sustainable, wash jeans less, in cold water, and line dry
LCA Levi Jeans - stages of life
Stage 6 - Reuse/Recycle
donate your jeans to Goodwill
LCA Levi Jeans - stages of life
Stage 7 - Disposal
-clothing contributes 238B pounds to landfills/year
-average person throws away 68 Ibs/clothing/year
Outputs
impacts from landfill/incinerator, solid waste, air/water emissions, land used, transported to countries outside of U.S. impacts on health and environments
Externalities
health and environmental impacts from solid waste disposal impact water quality and wildlife from washing jeans - detergents, plastics
Fast fashion
providing clothes quickly and cheaply to consumers through shorter fashion cycles
-linear fashion model - buying, wearing, and quickly discarding clothes
impacts: economics, social, and environmental
environmental consequences: overuse of resources (esp. water ) for production, generates waste
Externalities
economic: garments workers in Bangladesh grossly underpaid → non-living wages average $96/month
social: forced and child labor in developing countries
profits before human welfare
How to improve/ ways to help
business models changing - industry beginning to transition to sustainability and longevity, by REUSE
extending the life of the garment
“RENT/LEASE clothing instead of buying” model
requires individuality/cultural change (Adaptation)
fast fashion industry is eliminating the disposal phase of LCA “cradle to cradle” approach