1/10
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Passive Avoidance & R-O Contingency
Behavior decreases because responding produces an aversive outcome
Active Avoidance & R-O Contingency
Behavior increases because responding prevents an aversive stimulus
Two-Process Theory of Avoidance
Fear is classically conditioned to a signal, and avoidance is operantly reinforced by fear reduction
Instrumental Response is Reinforced By
Reduction of fear/anxiety (negative reinforcement)
Discrete Trial Procedure
Learning occurs in separate trials with a clear beginning and end
Avoidance Learning Paradox
Behavior is maintained even when no aversive stimulus occurs, contradicting reinforcement theory
Signaled Avoidance
Warning signal (CS) predicts aversive event; response during signal prevents it
Free-Operant Avoidance
No warning signal; behavior is based on time intervals
Free-Operant Avoidance Requires Tracking
Time intervals (S-S and R-S intervals)
Incorrect Statement (S-S Interval)
❌ Animals do NOT strive to reset the S-S interval; ✔️ They respond to delay/avoid shock (R-S interval)
Predatory Imminence Hypothesis
Once a predator is detected, the organism engages in defensive behaviors (freezing, fleeing, fighting depending on threat level)