1/19
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
circular business models
creates product value while improving resource efficiency by extending useful life of resources/products
purpose: environmental and social sustainability → meeting current needs but not comprising needs of future generations
not economic sustainability! that is consumption-oriented, eg having newer versions so that can have profit each year → not circular business model!
production and consumption
need to consider economic viability
linear business model
focused on economic sustainability (or short term profit)
planned obsolescence: “best before” → telling consumer that it will become obsolete so need to replace it → encourages repurchase but may damage reputation
types of circular business models
circular supply models
resource recovery models
product life extension models
sharing models
product service system models
circular supply models
approach that creates product value while improving resource efficiency by extending useful life of resources/products
aim to reduce reliance on new raw materials/resources
through using fully recyclable/renewable/biodegradable inputs that serve as essential materials for a different production process
important for companies which depend on scarce resources
resource recovery models
aim to obtain additional use from the raw materials and energy that were used to produce the original product
convert waste (used output) into secondary raw materials (input)
buying back products that were thrown away, sorting and processing them
selling the resources from waste to other businesses to use
advantages of resource recovery models
reduces dependence on high-cost new raw materials
if can sell waste materials, new stream of income
improve brand image: environmentally conscious, CSR → attract eco-minded consumers
disadvantages of resource recovery models
high capital cost of location and equipment to recover resources
energy and other resources
not economically viable without gov support (alt: tax newly exploited resources to increase cost and encourage resource recovery)
recycling sites need to be located away from habitated areas
product life extension models
aim to maximise the useful life of goods by refurbishing or upgrading customer’s existing product, minimise waste levels and exploitation of new materials
stakeholder conflict:
consumers want longer useful life
business wants consumer to replace so that there will be repeat sales, revenue and profit
usually planned obsolence: deliberately designed to fail over time → reputation damaged
consumerism encouraged by tech developments, replace with latest version even before useful life ends
leads to waste + using newly exploited materials to produce new products
advantages of product life extension models
lower cost of production in long term, since exploiting new materials more expensive than refurbishing
improve brand image: environmentally conscious, CSR → attract eco-minded consumers
consumer protection laws becoming stricter, want products’ useful life longer → will avoid breaking these laws
can sell spare parts and maintenance materials, new stream of income
disadvantages of product life extension models
won’t work in all markets, some consumers rather latest model
initial production cost higher since need higher-quality materials to be durable
consumer expectations for lifespan increase → any problems with quality/performance will lead to negative publicity, affect brand image and sales
sharing models
business connects owners of underutilised items with people willing to pay to use
encourages owners of products to increase the usage and value derived from them by sharing with others
for products that aren’t used constantly: share with other consumers so that don’t need produce as many products
advantages of sharing models
owners: receive payment
sharers: can use without fixed cost of buying → encourages small business startups since lower overhead costs
business (sharing platform): receive fee without having to own/sell product
disadvantages of sharing business models
owners: most fees go to business, less returns
consumers: safety risks (eg car sharing), privacy risks of online sharing platforms
less gov control → adds risk for owners and sharers
product service system models
consumer buys service as and when needed, not the product itself (owned by business) → ensures products are fully utilised → fewer products need to be produced → reduces resource usage and resolves stakeholder conflict
stakeholder conflict
business: want to use more resources to produce and sell more
customers: want to purchase less to have lower costs
encourages both to reduce life cycle costs (material, labour, waste management costs)
long-term maintenance/replacement/recycling is at expense of business → encourages sustainability
customers don’t own the product since they only use when needed → reduce costs
more products are fully utilised more of the time → less energy/resources
advantages of product service system models
reduce conflict between consumers and suppliers
economy: more sustainable since fewer products produced
workers: increased employment in service sector
risk of poor performance passed onto supplier instead of consumer
builds long-term customer relationships
disadvantages of product service system models
customer resistance to not owning/controlling the asset
locked-in to long-term contracts, disadvantage if product/supplier unreliable
efficiency
produce more output with same input OR same output with less input
areas
increasing sales per person
increasing output per worker
increasing output per machine hour
reduced average costs per unit of output: using EOS → only for bigger businesses
ways to increase
increasing motivation
improved technology
improved training
role of operations manager
increase efficiency of value-adding to business inputs
value added = selling price – cost of raw materials
process of:
adding value to inputs: land (including raw materials), labour, capital, enterprise
in order to produce output (product): goods or services
sustainability
long-term benefits, not not short-term gains. consuming at a rate that does not deplete from future generations.
improved by conserving resources or finding more efficient ways to produce or discover new resources
triple bottom line
model for sustainability
social (people): focus not only on the local community but also consider the cultural norms and values within the external environment
environmental (planet): retain biodiversity in long run. minimising negative environmental impact.
economic (profit): continue functioning profitably over time