United States v Lopez (copy)

0.0(0)
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/5

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

6 Terms

1
New cards

Background

In Texas, a high school senior (Lopez) decided to carry a gun with bullets to school. Under state law, he was arrested because guns were prohibited on school property. The state charges were dropped and replaced with federal charges

2
New cards

Debate:

Is gun law a state issue or federal issue?

3
New cards

Why was there a federal law associated with guns?

It was granted to Congress in the Commerce Clause

4
New cards

Commerce Clause

To regulate commerce with foreign nations and among the several states, and with the Indian Tribes. Congress has the authority to establish a free trade zone in the States

5
New cards

Arguments

  1. USA: Guns in school is relayed to interstate commerce because guns lead to gun violence which would lead to less travel in those states which would negatively affect commerce

  2. LOPEZ: Gun regulation on school property is a power reserved for the states. USA argument is a REACH

6
New cards

Decision:

Sided with LOPEZ because if everything were to interpreted with the Commerce Clause, what cant the federal gov regulate