1/8
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
aversive control
negative reinforcement and punishment
negative reinforcement
escape, avoidance
establishing (motivating) operation
presence of aversive stimulus motivates organism to remove/reduce it
two-factor theory of avoidance (two-process theory)
respondent and operant conditioning
primary aversive stimuli
Unconditioned
UAS
Don’t need experience with them to be aversive
secondary aversive stimuli
Conditioned
CAS
Aren’t aversive by themselves
History of being paired with unconditioned aversive stimulus/another conditioned aversive stimulus required
respondent conditioning
Neutral stimulus paired with unconditioned aversive stimulus (UAS)
operant conditioning (escape)
Once warning stimulus becomes CAS, presenting it becomes EO
one-factor theory of avoidance
Don’t always need warning signal to avoid aversive stimulus
According to theory, avoidance can be maintained when behavior simply:
Reduces overall frequency of aversive stimuli
Delays occurrence of aversive stimuli
No warning stimuli necessary
Respondent conditioning isn’t necessary
Respondent conditioning can and may occur, but isn’t necessary
operant conditioning