Criminal Procedure: Exclusionary Rule, Grand Jury, Bail, and Plea Bargaining

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/116

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 11:14 PM on 4/1/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

117 Terms

1
New cards

Exclusionary rule

illegally obtained evidence must be excluded from trial, but this does not apply to grand juries

2
New cards

Weeks v. U.S. (1914)

case that established the federal exclusionary rule for illegally obtained evidence

3
New cards

Mapp v. Ohio (1961)

case that applied the exclusionary rule to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment

4
New cards

Good faith exception

exception to the exclusionary rule when officers reasonably rely on a defective warrant or law

5
New cards

Inevitable discovery rule

exception allowing illegally obtained evidence if it would have been discovered lawfully anyway

6
New cards

Crisis of legitimacy (Epp, Maynard-Moody, Haider-Markel 2017)

study examining investigatory police stops and how they affect public trust in police

7
New cards

Dispute processing (court function)

courts resolve conflicts between parties by applying law to facts

8
New cards

Policy making (court function)

courts shape public policy through their interpretations and rulings

9
New cards

Enforcing norms (court function)

courts uphold societal rules and standards through their decisions

10
New cards

Adversarial system

legal system where prosecution and defense oppose each other before a neutral judge or jury

11
New cards

Inquisitorial system

legal system where the judge takes an active role in investigating the facts of the case

12
New cards

Federal judicial selection

federal judges are selected by presidential nomination and Senate confirmation

13
New cards

State judicial selection

state judges selected by governor, legislature, merit selection, or elections

14
New cards

Merit selection

system using a nominating commission and appointment, often followed by retention elections

15
New cards

Partisan judicial elections

judicial candidates run with party labels on the ballot

16
New cards

Nonpartisan judicial elections

judicial candidates run without party labels on the ballot

17
New cards

Election of prosecutors

method where voters choose prosecutors; used in 43 states for state prosecutors

18
New cards

Appointment of prosecutors

method where executive or other officials appoint prosecutors rather than elect them

19
New cards

Incumbency advantage (prosecutors)

sitting prosecutors are very likely to be reelected once in office

20
New cards

Defense attorneys

lawyers representing criminal defendants, including indigent clients

21
New cards

Indigent defense

legal representation for defendants who cannot afford an attorney

22
New cards

Assigned counsel

private attorneys appointed case by case to represent indigent defendants

23
New cards

Contract counsel

private attorneys or firms that contract to handle indigent defense cases for a jurisdiction

24
New cards

Public defender

full-time salaried government-funded attorney representing indigent defendants

25
New cards

Grand jury

group of citizens that decides whether there is enough evidence to issue an indictment

26
New cards

Indictment

formal charge issued by a grand jury alleging probable cause that the defendant committed a crime

27
New cards

Grand juror number

specific size of the grand jury panel required by law in a jurisdiction

28
New cards

Grand jury vote standard

level of agreement (e.g., majority or supermajority) needed to return an indictment

29
New cards

Grand jury vote threshold

exact number or fraction of grand jurors who must vote to indict

30
New cards

Prosecutor role in grand jury

presents evidence and guides the grand jury in deciding on indictment

31
New cards

Defense role in grand jury

usually very limited or no role; defense typically does not present a full case

32
New cards

Cash bail

money paid to secure release before trial, returned if defendant appears as required

33
New cards

Release on recognizance

defendant is released based on promise to appear, with no cash bail required

34
New cards

Percentage bail

defendant pays a percentage of the full bail amount to secure release

35
New cards

Bail funds

organizations that pay bail on behalf of defendants who cannot afford it

36
New cards

Preventive detention

holding a defendant in jail before trial to prevent flight or danger to the community

37
New cards

Federal Bail Reform Act of 1984

law allowing preventive detention of certain defendants based on risk factors

38
New cards

Serious flight risk (bail)

likelihood that a defendant will fail to appear if released before trial

39
New cards

Obstruction or threat to witnesses

basis to detain a defendant who may interfere with justice or intimidate witnesses

40
New cards

Crime of violence (bail)

offense category that can justify denying bail or imposing stricter conditions

41
New cards

United States v. Salerno and Cafero

case upholding preventive detention under the Bail Reform Act as constitutional

42
New cards

Plea bargain

agreement where defendant pleads guilty in exchange for concessions from the prosecution

43
New cards

Plea bargaining rate

up to about 90-96 percent of criminal cases end in a plea bargain rather than trial

44
New cards

Boykin v. Alabama (1969)

case requiring judges to ensure on the record that a guilty plea is voluntary and informed

45
New cards

North Carolina v. Alford (1970)

case allowing defendants to plead guilty while maintaining innocence to get a lesser sentence (Alford plea)

46
New cards

Nolo contendere

"no contest" plea where defendant does not admit guilt but accepts conviction

47
New cards

Santobello v. New York (1971)

case holding that prosecutors must keep the promises made in plea agreements

48
New cards

Ricketts v. Adamson (1987)

case holding that defendants must honor plea agreement terms or face consequences

49
New cards

Bordenkircher v. Hayes (1978)

case approving prosecutor's threat to seek harsher charges if defendant refuses a plea, as part of legitimate bargaining

50
New cards

Bordenkircher facts

defendant faced 2-10 years for check forgery; prosecutor threatened life sentence under three strikes if no plea

51
New cards

Bordenkircher outcome

defendant refused 5-year plea, was convicted and sentenced to life in prison

52
New cards

Hayes's claim

argued prosecutor's leverage made the choice unreasonable and gave prosecutor too much power

53
New cards

Supreme Court holding (Bordenkircher)

Court found no constitutional violation; plea bargaining pressure was permissible

54
New cards

Trial rate (felonies)

about 9 percent of felony cases go to trial instead of ending in pleas

55
New cards

Trial rate (murder cases)

fewer than 44 percent of murder cases go to trial

56
New cards

Bench trial

trial where the judge alone decides guilt, with no jury

57
New cards

Jury trial

trial where a jury of citizens determines guilt or innocence

58
New cards

Choice of bench vs. jury

decision typically left to the defendant (subject to rules and consent requirements)

59
New cards

Jury selection

process of choosing jurors through questioning and challenges

60
New cards

Challenge for cause

removal of a potential juror for a specific legal reason (e.g., bias)

61
New cards

Peremptory challenge

removal of a potential juror without stating a reason, subject to constitutional limits

62
New cards

Batson v. Kentucky

case holding that peremptory strikes cannot be based on race in violation of equal protection

63
New cards

Equal Protection Clause (jury selection)

constitutional rule preventing race- or gender-based exclusion of jurors

64
New cards

Real evidence

physical, tangible objects directly related to the crime (e.g., weapon, clothing)

65
New cards

Demonstrative evidence

evidence that illustrates or explains information relevant to the crime (e.g., charts, diagrams)

66
New cards

Testimony

oral statements by witnesses given under oath in court

67
New cards

Direct evidence

evidence that directly proves a fact, such as eyewitness accounts

68
New cards

Circumstantial evidence

evidence that requires inference by the jury to connect it to a fact in issue; most common type

69
New cards

Prosecution case at trial

prosecution presents evidence and witnesses to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt

70
New cards

Burden of proof

obligation of the state to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt

71
New cards

Defense trial strategy

focus on creating reasonable doubt, highlighting inconsistencies, and reducing perceived guilt

72
New cards

Prosecution rebuttal

additional evidence or argument responding to the defense case

73
New cards

Closing arguments

final summaries by prosecution and defense before the jury deliberates

74
New cards

Jury instructions

directions from the judge explaining the law the jury must apply

75
New cards

Jury deliberation

private discussion among jurors to reach a verdict

76
New cards

Judge conviction rate

judges convict about 82 percent of the time in bench trials

77
New cards

Jury conviction rate

juries convict about 75 percent of the time

78
New cards

Verdict

jury or judge decision on guilt or innocence of the defendant

79
New cards

Appeal

legal process in which a higher court reviews the lower court's procedures for legal error

80
New cards

First appeal right

defendant has a guaranteed constitutional right to a first appeal in many cases

81
New cards

Scope of appellate review

appellate courts focus on legal and procedural errors, not re-deciding facts

82
New cards

Appeal success rate

less than 2 percent of appeals result in acquittals for defendants

83
New cards

Appeal result

successful appeal usually leads to a new trial or other remedy, not a finding of "innocent"

84
New cards

Government appeal limit

prosecution generally cannot appeal acquittals because of double jeopardy

85
New cards

Double jeopardy

constitutional protection against being tried twice for the same offense

86
New cards

Retribution

punishment imposed because the offender deserves it for the wrong committed

87
New cards

Deterrence

using punishment to discourage crime, either insociety (general) or by the individual (specific)

88
New cards

General deterrence

punishing an offender to discourage others in society from committing similar crimes

89
New cards

Specific deterrence

punishing an offender to discourage that same individual from reoffending

90
New cards

Incapacitation

preventing further crime by removing offenders from society (e.g., imprisonment)

91
New cards

Rehabilitation

efforts to change offenders' behavior and help them become constructive members of society

92
New cards

Rehabilitation era (40s-70s)

period when rehabilitation was a dominant goal in corrections

93
New cards

Restorative justice

approach focused on repairing harm done, involving offender, victim, and community

94
New cards

Restorative justice requirements

offender must agree to participate, victim must agree, and community must support the process

95
New cards

Restorative justice limits

generally not used for very serious crimes such as murder or sexual assault

96
New cards

Incarceration

confinement in jail or prison as a criminal penalty

97
New cards

Sentencing discretion

judge's authority to choose the type and length of sentence within legal limits

98
New cards

Visibility of imprisonment

imprisonment is the most visible penalty, but not the most frequently used

99
New cards

Correctional supervision distribution

fewer than 80 percent of people under correctional control are incarcerated; many are on probation or parole

100
New cards

Indeterminate sentence

sentence with a range of time (e.g., 18-24 months), associated with rehabilitation

Explore top notes

note
Unit 1 - The New Government
Updated 850d ago
0.0(0)
note
yo
Updated 200d ago
0.0(0)
note
1.1 Understanding Social Problems
Updated 1114d ago
0.0(0)
note
Action Potential
Updated 1318d ago
0.0(0)
note
French Grade 7-9 Structures
Updated 649d ago
0.0(0)
note
P1: Energy, Work, Power
Updated 381d ago
0.0(0)
note
Biology: Nervous System
Updated 1247d ago
0.0(0)
note
Unit 1 - The New Government
Updated 850d ago
0.0(0)
note
yo
Updated 200d ago
0.0(0)
note
1.1 Understanding Social Problems
Updated 1114d ago
0.0(0)
note
Action Potential
Updated 1318d ago
0.0(0)
note
French Grade 7-9 Structures
Updated 649d ago
0.0(0)
note
P1: Energy, Work, Power
Updated 381d ago
0.0(0)
note
Biology: Nervous System
Updated 1247d ago
0.0(0)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards
Chemistry Exam Two
27
Updated 1133d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
unit 7
132
Updated 413d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
talk to me in korean level 1
256
Updated 944d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
science... oh the misery..
110
Updated 492d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Pharmacology Table Review
78
Updated 1077d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Bio Chapter 6 WORKING
39
Updated 1211d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
10.3, 10.4, 10.5
36
Updated 1100d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Chemistry Exam Two
27
Updated 1133d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
unit 7
132
Updated 413d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
talk to me in korean level 1
256
Updated 944d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
science... oh the misery..
110
Updated 492d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Pharmacology Table Review
78
Updated 1077d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Bio Chapter 6 WORKING
39
Updated 1211d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
10.3, 10.4, 10.5
36
Updated 1100d ago
0.0(0)