Unit 1 - The New Government
enlightenment thinkers - Locke, Hobbes, Rosseau, Montesquieu
European thinkers and writers figured ways to challenge the tradition government style
Ben Franklin, Jefferson, Madison all used enlightenment ideas to justify their opposition
Locke:
He believed in the natural rights of individuals, including life, liberty, and property.
government's primary purpose was to protect these rights
If a government failed to do so, the people had the right to rebel and establish a new one.
Hobbes:
Without a strong central authority, society would descend into chaos and violence
Social contract, where individuals surrender some of their freedoms in exchange for protection
The concept of a strong federal government with limited powers can be traced back to Hobbes' belief
Rosseau:
idea of the general will - he collective voice of the people
The notion that government should reflect the desires and interests of the majority can be seen in the democratic principles of representation and voting rights
Montesquieu:
Theory of separation of powers
He advocated for a system of checks and balances, where different branches of government would have distinct powers to prevent tyranny
This principle is evident in the division of powers among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches
reason: logic and facts -→ solve social problems
natural laws: regulate human society -→ classes, rights, safety, security
progress: discovery of laws of gov -→ improve society
liberty: intellectual, social freedom
toleration: opposed superstition, intolerance, and bigotry
power: influence over actions
authority: the right to use that power
legitimacy: the need to have power
English common law: precedence that is established by court that holds the same significance as law
constitution: limits the gov -→ tells exactly what congress can and can not do -→ no over powerful gov
Judeo-Christian heritage: Christian religion supports the democracy -→ there are elements that help enforce different laws
ex. in God we trust or the pledge of allegiance
republicanism: elected representees make decisions
civil liberties: protection from the gov - what the gov cannot do or take away from the people
capitalism: enables economic property - you can earn however much money you can regardless of gov
Articles of Confederation (AOC) - the was scratched later b/c it did not work in the long-term and missed the mark on how much power the gov needs to have
created a confederation gov with friendship between the states
national gov was weak -→ each state retained sovereignty and freedom
each state has one vote and congress was unicameral (one house)
there was no executive or judicial branches -→ congress handled it
13 states (1 vote per state)
9/13 states to argue to pass a law
13/13 states to amend AOC
congress lacked the power to levy taxes -→ turned towards tariffs
no executive authority = no means to enforce will
no national judicial authority = no ways to settle disputes between states
no way to regulate trade -→ no uniform currency
no way to determine the punishment for someone who commits a crime in one state but flees to another state for refuge b/c no national judicial authority
Shays Rebellion
# Mind Map: Shays Rebellion
Shays Rebellion
Causes of Shays Rebellion
High taxes, debts, and foreclosures
Lack of representation and unfair laws
Key Players
Daniel Shays, farmers, and state officials
Events during Shays Rebellion
Protests, court shutdowns, and armed conflicts
Impact of Shays Rebellion
Influence on the Constitution and economic/social changes
Legacy of Shays Rebellion
Symbol of resistance and reminder of early challenges
helped convince leaders that the AOC were weak and the need for a strong central gov
need a gov that can maintain order, protect property and commerce
12/13 state delegations - 55 delegates: 33 lawyers, 34 college grads
Madison was the father of the constitution and there were 8 signers of the declaration with 8 being 7 current/former governors
human nature:
people are self-centered and selfish
the love of money has influence over men
pollical conflicts:
unequal distribution of property and the economic divide
the purpose of gov
preservation of property -→ capitalist principle
fear of excessive democracy and unruly state gov
nature of gov
gov should be limited and power should be divided
need for checks and balances
the Virginia plan
bicameral legislature
representation based on state population
new jersey plan
unicameral gov
equal representation
* controversy
issues of slavery, representation of congress and the proportional rep vs equal rep
compromise
bicameral legislature
house: proportional representation of population
senate: equal representation of population
the consequences of the compromise
the 10 most populated states have 20 senators representing 53% of the population
the 10 least populated states have 20 senators representing 3% of the population
3/5 compromise
southern view: if slaves counted as part of the pop then they have more influence in the house
northern view: how can property(slaves) count as part of the pop but you not pay for it because they are not considered “people” - if they are to be represented in congress then the taxes should reflect that - opposed to southern view
compromise: 3/5 of all other persons and free persons count as representation and the same would go for the taxes - tax by population
consequences: temporarily diffuses tensions -→ the matter over slavery was not solved until the 13th amendment
strong gov was needed to Promote Growth and protect private property
congress was given power to:
obtain revenue through taxing
pay debts
coin money and regulate its value
regulate interstate and foreign commerce
establish uniform laws of bankruptcy
punish counterfeiting
establish post offices and post roads
cannot be arrested without being told the crime and evidence
going to court and making a case but not at trial yet
have to be arrested and stand trial in order to inflict punishment
punishes a person for committing acts that were once legal but now illegal
up to the gov and their views
a right to trial by jury in criminal cases
cannot be asked to swear in oath regarding religion in order to hold office
legislative branch
article 1: made up of the house and the senate
executive branch
article 2: president and the electoral college
judicial branch
article 3: supreme court and all smaller court systems
*All this is to prevent tyranny
ex.
congress can make laws but the president can veto it
congress can veto if 2/3 of house vote
senate must ratify treaties the president negotiates
the pres. has power to negotiate and nominate judges to the supreme court but the senate has advice and consent power
the supreme court can use judicial review to declare laws unconstitutional
congress can propose an amendment to reverse supreme court rulings
the house has impeachment powers
the senate does the impeachment trial
difficult to remove someone from office
consequences
the 3 branches are not independent
the change is slow and a compromise is sometimes harder to reach
irresponsible majorities in one branch can be restrained
safe guards are important
founders feared majorities could abuse their power -→ why we do not have a direct democracy
mob mentality -→ chaos -→ decided to influence people power
an insulated senate
senate was bulwark against irresponsible majorities in the house and check popular passions
federal elections and midterm elections and senate is elected for 6 years (1/3 of it)
senate is continuous body
state legislators choose other senators
independent judiciary
judges serve for life
insulated from popular control
appointed by the president
indirectly elected president
not elected by popular vote
electoral college used to choose “distinguished character of continental reputation”
electors are now “rubber stamps” for the popular votes in each state
9/13 states required to approve the new constitution
antifederalist
small farmers, shopkeepers, and laborers
favored strong state gov and weak national gov
called for a bill of rights -→ protection of individual liberties
federalist
large landowners, wealthy merchants and professionals
favored strong national gov
wrote the federalist papers to defend the constitution
expressed powers
article 2 section 8
article 2 section 2
these are given to the federal government (enumerated powers)
ex.
the power to regulate foreign and interstate commerce
the power to tax and spend
the power to declare war
the power to coin money
implied powers
article 1 section 8 clause 18
elastic clause - gives congress the power to make all the laws which are necessary and proper for execution by the constitution for the country
inherent powers
the right to make treaties, wage war, and acquire territory
reserved powers
are solely held by the states
established by the 10th amendment
ex.
licensing doctors
establishing public doctors
establishing local gov
police power: the power of the state to regulate health, safety, morals, and the general welfare of the people
concurrent powers
exercised by both the national and state gov
ex.
the power to tax and borrow money
establish courts
dual federalism
national and state gov remain supreme within their own spheres
fiscal federalism
pattern of spending, taxing, borrowing, and providing money for grants in the federal system
categorical grants: have a lot of strings attached to money
ex. interstate highway - national government mainly uses this
block grants: fewer strings attached to money
ex. money given to states for homeland security
McCulloch vs Marylan
Supreme Court case establishing federal government supremacy over states and clarifying Congress's implied powers.
Main Branches:
Background
Facts and key players
Arguments
Maryland's and McCulloch's arguments
Supreme Court's Decision
Chief Justice Marshall's opinion and rationale
Implications
Supremacy of federal government
Scope of Congress's implied powers
Facts: Maryland taxed the Second Bank of the United States, McCulloch refused to pay
Key players: McCulloch and the State of Maryland
Maryland's (Jefferson) argument: Congress lacks explicit power to establish a national bank, states can tax entities within their borders
McCulloch's argument: Necessary and Proper Clause grants Congress implied powers for a national bank, state taxation interferes with federal operations
Can the national bank exist at all?
Can the state tax the bank?
Necessary and Proper Clause empowers Congress to establish a national bank, states cannot tax federal institutions
Rationale for decision: Federal government's supremacy over states, Congress has implied powers to carry out enumerated powers
Supremacy of federal government: Federal laws and institutions superior to state laws and institutions, states cannot impede federal entities
Scope of Congress's implied powers: Necessary and Proper Clause expands Congress's authority beyond enumerated powers, Congress can take actions reasonably related to its powers.
Central Idea:
The landmark Supreme Court case of Gibbons vs Ogden, which established the federal government's power to regulate interstate commerce.
Background:
Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution
Conflict between state and federal regulation of commerce
NY state law gave Ogden exclusive rights to the Hudson river - Gibbons had a federal license to allow him to operate his boat
Arguments Presented:
Thomas Gibbons:
Federal license to operate steamboats
Interstate nature of his business
Aaron Ogden:
Exclusive state license to operate ferries
State's right to regulate commerce within its borders
State of New York:
Asserted its authority to regulate commerce within the state
United States Government:
Argued for federal regulation of interstate commerce
Challenged the state's exclusive license
Supreme Court Decision:
Ruled in favor of Gibbons
Established federal government's power to regulate interstate commerce
State regulations that conflicted with federal laws were invalid
Commerce Clause interpretation
Impact on future cases and federal power
Significance in shaping the balance between state and federal authority
Significance
federal license has more right to the over the state law
congress can regulate trade through all states
broke down local monopolies and facilitated growing national gov economy
Central Idea: Supreme Court case regarding the constitutionality of the Gun-Free School Zones Act
Background of the Case
Gun-Free School Zones Act (GFSZA)
Alfonso Lopez Jr. arrested for possessing a firearm in a school zone
Legal Issues
Commerce Clause
Federal vs State Powers
Arguments Presented
Government's Argument
GFSZA falls under the Commerce Clause
Necessary to maintain safe learning environments
Lopez's Argument
GFSZA exceeds Congress' power under the Commerce Clause
Violation of state sovereignty
Supreme Court Decision
Majority Opinion
GFSZA unconstitutional
Commerce Clause does not cover possession of firearms in school zones
Dissenting Opinion
GFSZA constitutional
Possession of firearms affects interstate commerce
Impact and Significance
Limitation of Congress' power under the Commerce Clause
Clarification of federal vs state powers
Influence on future cases related to federal legislation
Background of the Case
GFSZA
Passed in 1990
Aimed to create gun-free zones around schools
Alfonso Lopez Jr.
High school student in Texas
Arrested for possessing a firearm in a school zone
Legal Issues
Commerce Clause
Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the US Constitution
Grants Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce
Federal vs State Powers
Tension between federal and state jurisdiction
Arguments Presented
Government's Argument
GFSZA falls under the Commerce Clause
Possession of firearms affects interstate commerce
Necessary to maintain safe learning environments
Prevents violence and promotes education
Lopez's Argument
GFSZA exceeds Congress' power under the Commerce Clause
Possession of firearms in school zones is not economic activity
Violation of state sovereignty
States should have the authority to regulate firearms in schools
Supreme Court Decision
Majority Opinion
GFSZA unconstitutional
Possession of firearms in school zones does not substantially affect interstate commerce
Commerce Clause
significance
the power of the national gov to maintain interstate commerce is not unlimited -→ reduces the national supremacy of the gov
enlightenment thinkers - Locke, Hobbes, Rosseau, Montesquieu
European thinkers and writers figured ways to challenge the tradition government style
Ben Franklin, Jefferson, Madison all used enlightenment ideas to justify their opposition
Locke:
He believed in the natural rights of individuals, including life, liberty, and property.
government's primary purpose was to protect these rights
If a government failed to do so, the people had the right to rebel and establish a new one.
Hobbes:
Without a strong central authority, society would descend into chaos and violence
Social contract, where individuals surrender some of their freedoms in exchange for protection
The concept of a strong federal government with limited powers can be traced back to Hobbes' belief
Rosseau:
idea of the general will - he collective voice of the people
The notion that government should reflect the desires and interests of the majority can be seen in the democratic principles of representation and voting rights
Montesquieu:
Theory of separation of powers
He advocated for a system of checks and balances, where different branches of government would have distinct powers to prevent tyranny
This principle is evident in the division of powers among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches
reason: logic and facts -→ solve social problems
natural laws: regulate human society -→ classes, rights, safety, security
progress: discovery of laws of gov -→ improve society
liberty: intellectual, social freedom
toleration: opposed superstition, intolerance, and bigotry
power: influence over actions
authority: the right to use that power
legitimacy: the need to have power
English common law: precedence that is established by court that holds the same significance as law
constitution: limits the gov -→ tells exactly what congress can and can not do -→ no over powerful gov
Judeo-Christian heritage: Christian religion supports the democracy -→ there are elements that help enforce different laws
ex. in God we trust or the pledge of allegiance
republicanism: elected representees make decisions
civil liberties: protection from the gov - what the gov cannot do or take away from the people
capitalism: enables economic property - you can earn however much money you can regardless of gov
Articles of Confederation (AOC) - the was scratched later b/c it did not work in the long-term and missed the mark on how much power the gov needs to have
created a confederation gov with friendship between the states
national gov was weak -→ each state retained sovereignty and freedom
each state has one vote and congress was unicameral (one house)
there was no executive or judicial branches -→ congress handled it
13 states (1 vote per state)
9/13 states to argue to pass a law
13/13 states to amend AOC
congress lacked the power to levy taxes -→ turned towards tariffs
no executive authority = no means to enforce will
no national judicial authority = no ways to settle disputes between states
no way to regulate trade -→ no uniform currency
no way to determine the punishment for someone who commits a crime in one state but flees to another state for refuge b/c no national judicial authority
Shays Rebellion
# Mind Map: Shays Rebellion
Shays Rebellion
Causes of Shays Rebellion
High taxes, debts, and foreclosures
Lack of representation and unfair laws
Key Players
Daniel Shays, farmers, and state officials
Events during Shays Rebellion
Protests, court shutdowns, and armed conflicts
Impact of Shays Rebellion
Influence on the Constitution and economic/social changes
Legacy of Shays Rebellion
Symbol of resistance and reminder of early challenges
helped convince leaders that the AOC were weak and the need for a strong central gov
need a gov that can maintain order, protect property and commerce
12/13 state delegations - 55 delegates: 33 lawyers, 34 college grads
Madison was the father of the constitution and there were 8 signers of the declaration with 8 being 7 current/former governors
human nature:
people are self-centered and selfish
the love of money has influence over men
pollical conflicts:
unequal distribution of property and the economic divide
the purpose of gov
preservation of property -→ capitalist principle
fear of excessive democracy and unruly state gov
nature of gov
gov should be limited and power should be divided
need for checks and balances
the Virginia plan
bicameral legislature
representation based on state population
new jersey plan
unicameral gov
equal representation
* controversy
issues of slavery, representation of congress and the proportional rep vs equal rep
compromise
bicameral legislature
house: proportional representation of population
senate: equal representation of population
the consequences of the compromise
the 10 most populated states have 20 senators representing 53% of the population
the 10 least populated states have 20 senators representing 3% of the population
3/5 compromise
southern view: if slaves counted as part of the pop then they have more influence in the house
northern view: how can property(slaves) count as part of the pop but you not pay for it because they are not considered “people” - if they are to be represented in congress then the taxes should reflect that - opposed to southern view
compromise: 3/5 of all other persons and free persons count as representation and the same would go for the taxes - tax by population
consequences: temporarily diffuses tensions -→ the matter over slavery was not solved until the 13th amendment
strong gov was needed to Promote Growth and protect private property
congress was given power to:
obtain revenue through taxing
pay debts
coin money and regulate its value
regulate interstate and foreign commerce
establish uniform laws of bankruptcy
punish counterfeiting
establish post offices and post roads
cannot be arrested without being told the crime and evidence
going to court and making a case but not at trial yet
have to be arrested and stand trial in order to inflict punishment
punishes a person for committing acts that were once legal but now illegal
up to the gov and their views
a right to trial by jury in criminal cases
cannot be asked to swear in oath regarding religion in order to hold office
legislative branch
article 1: made up of the house and the senate
executive branch
article 2: president and the electoral college
judicial branch
article 3: supreme court and all smaller court systems
*All this is to prevent tyranny
ex.
congress can make laws but the president can veto it
congress can veto if 2/3 of house vote
senate must ratify treaties the president negotiates
the pres. has power to negotiate and nominate judges to the supreme court but the senate has advice and consent power
the supreme court can use judicial review to declare laws unconstitutional
congress can propose an amendment to reverse supreme court rulings
the house has impeachment powers
the senate does the impeachment trial
difficult to remove someone from office
consequences
the 3 branches are not independent
the change is slow and a compromise is sometimes harder to reach
irresponsible majorities in one branch can be restrained
safe guards are important
founders feared majorities could abuse their power -→ why we do not have a direct democracy
mob mentality -→ chaos -→ decided to influence people power
an insulated senate
senate was bulwark against irresponsible majorities in the house and check popular passions
federal elections and midterm elections and senate is elected for 6 years (1/3 of it)
senate is continuous body
state legislators choose other senators
independent judiciary
judges serve for life
insulated from popular control
appointed by the president
indirectly elected president
not elected by popular vote
electoral college used to choose “distinguished character of continental reputation”
electors are now “rubber stamps” for the popular votes in each state
9/13 states required to approve the new constitution
antifederalist
small farmers, shopkeepers, and laborers
favored strong state gov and weak national gov
called for a bill of rights -→ protection of individual liberties
federalist
large landowners, wealthy merchants and professionals
favored strong national gov
wrote the federalist papers to defend the constitution
expressed powers
article 2 section 8
article 2 section 2
these are given to the federal government (enumerated powers)
ex.
the power to regulate foreign and interstate commerce
the power to tax and spend
the power to declare war
the power to coin money
implied powers
article 1 section 8 clause 18
elastic clause - gives congress the power to make all the laws which are necessary and proper for execution by the constitution for the country
inherent powers
the right to make treaties, wage war, and acquire territory
reserved powers
are solely held by the states
established by the 10th amendment
ex.
licensing doctors
establishing public doctors
establishing local gov
police power: the power of the state to regulate health, safety, morals, and the general welfare of the people
concurrent powers
exercised by both the national and state gov
ex.
the power to tax and borrow money
establish courts
dual federalism
national and state gov remain supreme within their own spheres
fiscal federalism
pattern of spending, taxing, borrowing, and providing money for grants in the federal system
categorical grants: have a lot of strings attached to money
ex. interstate highway - national government mainly uses this
block grants: fewer strings attached to money
ex. money given to states for homeland security
McCulloch vs Marylan
Supreme Court case establishing federal government supremacy over states and clarifying Congress's implied powers.
Main Branches:
Background
Facts and key players
Arguments
Maryland's and McCulloch's arguments
Supreme Court's Decision
Chief Justice Marshall's opinion and rationale
Implications
Supremacy of federal government
Scope of Congress's implied powers
Facts: Maryland taxed the Second Bank of the United States, McCulloch refused to pay
Key players: McCulloch and the State of Maryland
Maryland's (Jefferson) argument: Congress lacks explicit power to establish a national bank, states can tax entities within their borders
McCulloch's argument: Necessary and Proper Clause grants Congress implied powers for a national bank, state taxation interferes with federal operations
Can the national bank exist at all?
Can the state tax the bank?
Necessary and Proper Clause empowers Congress to establish a national bank, states cannot tax federal institutions
Rationale for decision: Federal government's supremacy over states, Congress has implied powers to carry out enumerated powers
Supremacy of federal government: Federal laws and institutions superior to state laws and institutions, states cannot impede federal entities
Scope of Congress's implied powers: Necessary and Proper Clause expands Congress's authority beyond enumerated powers, Congress can take actions reasonably related to its powers.
Central Idea:
The landmark Supreme Court case of Gibbons vs Ogden, which established the federal government's power to regulate interstate commerce.
Background:
Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution
Conflict between state and federal regulation of commerce
NY state law gave Ogden exclusive rights to the Hudson river - Gibbons had a federal license to allow him to operate his boat
Arguments Presented:
Thomas Gibbons:
Federal license to operate steamboats
Interstate nature of his business
Aaron Ogden:
Exclusive state license to operate ferries
State's right to regulate commerce within its borders
State of New York:
Asserted its authority to regulate commerce within the state
United States Government:
Argued for federal regulation of interstate commerce
Challenged the state's exclusive license
Supreme Court Decision:
Ruled in favor of Gibbons
Established federal government's power to regulate interstate commerce
State regulations that conflicted with federal laws were invalid
Commerce Clause interpretation
Impact on future cases and federal power
Significance in shaping the balance between state and federal authority
Significance
federal license has more right to the over the state law
congress can regulate trade through all states
broke down local monopolies and facilitated growing national gov economy
Central Idea: Supreme Court case regarding the constitutionality of the Gun-Free School Zones Act
Background of the Case
Gun-Free School Zones Act (GFSZA)
Alfonso Lopez Jr. arrested for possessing a firearm in a school zone
Legal Issues
Commerce Clause
Federal vs State Powers
Arguments Presented
Government's Argument
GFSZA falls under the Commerce Clause
Necessary to maintain safe learning environments
Lopez's Argument
GFSZA exceeds Congress' power under the Commerce Clause
Violation of state sovereignty
Supreme Court Decision
Majority Opinion
GFSZA unconstitutional
Commerce Clause does not cover possession of firearms in school zones
Dissenting Opinion
GFSZA constitutional
Possession of firearms affects interstate commerce
Impact and Significance
Limitation of Congress' power under the Commerce Clause
Clarification of federal vs state powers
Influence on future cases related to federal legislation
Background of the Case
GFSZA
Passed in 1990
Aimed to create gun-free zones around schools
Alfonso Lopez Jr.
High school student in Texas
Arrested for possessing a firearm in a school zone
Legal Issues
Commerce Clause
Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the US Constitution
Grants Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce
Federal vs State Powers
Tension between federal and state jurisdiction
Arguments Presented
Government's Argument
GFSZA falls under the Commerce Clause
Possession of firearms affects interstate commerce
Necessary to maintain safe learning environments
Prevents violence and promotes education
Lopez's Argument
GFSZA exceeds Congress' power under the Commerce Clause
Possession of firearms in school zones is not economic activity
Violation of state sovereignty
States should have the authority to regulate firearms in schools
Supreme Court Decision
Majority Opinion
GFSZA unconstitutional
Possession of firearms in school zones does not substantially affect interstate commerce
Commerce Clause
significance
the power of the national gov to maintain interstate commerce is not unlimited -→ reduces the national supremacy of the gov