Private nuisance defences

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/3

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

4 Terms

1
New cards

Moving to nuisance

D argues that nuisance existed when C came to the land and this amounted effectively to consenting to it - Miller v Jackson established that this is not a defence although may be considered for remedies

2
New cards

Social utility

D argues that nuisance amounts to public benefit and should be exempt Bellew v Cement Co again Miller v Jackson established that it’s not a defence but can be considered for remedies

3
New cards

Prescription

D argues they’ve acquired the right to commit nuisance Sturges v Bridgman However activity must last for at least 20 years and amounted to an actionable nuisance for at least that long Coventry v Lawrence

4
New cards

Statutory authority

Will provide defence to actionable nuisance unless it can be avoided by use of reasonable care and skill Allen v Gulf Oil Refining Co but cannot be defence to nuisance outside the scope of authorised activity Barr and others v Biffa waste services