1/16
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
mean
average value
calculated by adding all values and dividing by the number of values
median
middle value when data are ordered from lowest to highest
mode
value that occurs most frequently in a data set
standard deviation
measure of how dispersed values are around the mean
minimum
the lowest value in a dataset
maximum
highest value in a dataset
rank
position of a blue in an ordered list of data
percentile
the ranked position of a value expressed as a percentage relative to all the values in a dataset
relationships
methods for correlation which can provide different interpretations of the same data
assess association or agreement
establishes the relationship between two variables
the main result is the correlation coefficient
this is known as the “r value”
r value
describes the strength and direction of the relationship
strength is expressed by the number
1 is strong/perfect
0 is no relationship
the closer the r-value is to 1 there is a strong trend between the two values
direction is described by the sign
-ve indicates that as one variable increases the other decreases
+ve indicates that as one variable increases the other also increases
must match both directionally and by amount
pearson correlation
assesses association
can only be used with 2 raters/measuremnts
can use excel
for a simple comparison =CORREL(array1,array2)
for a matrix use “data” then “data analysis” → “correlation”
intraclass correlation
asses agreement
can be used with 2+ raters/measurmetns
can partially use excel but does ot provide CI so must use SPSS, R, python etc.
r-value strength
.7-1 → very strong
.5-.7 → strong
.3-.5 → moderate
0-.3 → weak
0 → none
can be both positive or negative
in exercise science we like to be 0.7 or above to make correlations whereas other sciences ushc as physics require higher values of 0.97 or above
correlation ≠ causation
relationships do not describe the exact relationship or forms
a linear regression is needed to determine this
does not describe non-linear (plynomial) relationships
in this case advanced methods are needed
bias
Bland-Altman plots used to anaulse the agreement between two measures
plots difference between two measures against the mean of both measures
limits of agreement are set at 1.96 SD
looking ot see if there is systematic bias
relationship between mean and difference
ie. increasing mean = increased difference?
agreement of Bias
at least 95% of measures should fall within LOA
bias should close to mean
ie. zero or close to it
LOA should be small relative to mean
bias analysis in excel
Calculate average of the two variables
Calculate the difference between the variables (=Var2-Var1)
Calculate SD (STD.S) of the difference
Calculate the bias (the average difference)
Calculate upper limit of agreement (LOA) =bias+1.96*SD
Calculate lower limit of agreement (LOA) =bias-1.96*SD
Calculate minimum and maximum of average of the two variables
Highlight the data in the two columns containing the average and the difference
On the “Insert” tab, in the “Charts” menu, select “Scatter Plot”
Add axis titles (x=Mean, y=Difference)
Select data, Add a Series;
Name=Upper LOA, x=MinMean MaxMean, y=Upper LOA, Upper LOA
Name=Lower LOA, x=MinMean MaxMean, y=Lower LOA, Lower LOA
Name=Bias, x=MinMean MaxMean, y=Bias, Bias
One at a time, click each pairs of dots, go to fill, solid line (LOA can be dotted w/ bias solid or all solid or all dotted)