Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
Non-Parametric Analysis
Type of Analysis with IV present or absent. Comparing treatment conditions.
Parametric Analysis
Type of analysis that varies the amount of the IV to find the most effective amount
Collateral Effects
When an IV effects behaviors other than the target behavior
Steady State Responding
Pattern of the target behavior with little variation over time Establishes the foundation of baseline logic
4 patterns of baseline
Descending
Ascending
Variable
Stable
3 parts of baseline logic
Prediction
Verification
Replication
Prediction
The projected result of a data path. More data points makes it stronger
Practice effects
Confounding variable that presents when behavior improves due to opportunities to emit it
Verification
Effectiveness of the IV is proven, data returns to baseline after removal of the IV
Replication
Reintroduce the IV and results are similar to the previous outcomes
Multiple baseline design
Type of experimental design with 1 IV and 2 or more DVs. The most utilized design used to demonstrate generalization when the target behaviors are irreversible but can show weak control
Multiple Probe
Variation of multiple baseline that uses staggered single data points to show relation between IV and acquisition of skills sequences
Delayed Multiple baseline
Variation of multiple baseline where new baselines are added when a novel behavior, subject or setting becomes available or known
Nonconcurrent multiple baseline across participants
Series of AB designs in a specific order across subjects at different points in time when you can't take concurrent data
Changing Criterion Design
Type of experimental design where the baseline is followed by a series of treatment phases with gradually changing stepwise changes. Looks At how criteria can control responding
Reversal Design
Type of experimental design where responding is returned to a level from a different condition. Alteration between IV and baseline. Shows the strongest direct functional relation but has limitations of sequencing effects and irreversibility
Types of reversal designs
Repeated Reversals
BAB
Multiple Treatment Design
NCR reversal Technique
DRO/DRA/DRI reversal technique
BAB Reversal
Type of reversal with 3 phases used when the client displays dangerous behavior, when the IV is already present and when baseline isn't necessary. Limitation of sequence effects
Sequence effects
Confounding variable with reversal design where the implementation of the IV in one phase change behavior in the next phase
Multiple Treatment Design
Type of reversal Design that compares 2 or more IVs to baseline or each other. Shows which IV is most effective. (C D E F) Limitation of sequence effects
Non Contingent reinforcement reversal technique
Type of reversal design with a minimum of 5 phases that shows effects of reinforcement while using NCR as a control instead of baseline.
Differentail reinforcement reversal Technique
Type of reversal design that is less time consuming than NCR reversal. Shows the effects of reinforcement by using differential reinforcement (DRO/DRI/DRA) as the control condition instead of baseline
Irreversability
When a behavior can not be returned to baseline
Multielement design
Experimental design where 2 or more IVs are presented in rapidly alternating succession. Measures differential effects of IVs on the target behavior. Sd is usually associated with each condition.
Single phase without initial baseline
Most basic application of multielement design, all comparisons made in one phase
2-phase with initial baseline
Variation of multielement where treatment is implemented after stability in baseline
3-phase with initial baseline, comparison and final best treatment phase
Most popular variation of multielement where there is a baseline, treatment and final phase with the most effective treatment displayed
3-phase with initial baseline, comparison and final participants choice
Variation of multielement with baseline, treatment and final phase with the the participants choice of treatment displayed
Concurrent Chains design
variation of multielement design where the client makes a choice between 2 or more concurrently available IVs. IVs are presented by the researcher with an associated Sd.
Repeated reversals
BAB
Multiple treatment design
NCR reversal
DR reversal
5 variations of reversal design
BAB Reversal
Multiple treatment Design
NCR reversal
Single Phase without initial baseline
2-Phase with initial baseline
Internal Validity
Experiment shows that changes in behavior are a direct result of the IV and not another variable
4 confounding variables to Interval validity (MISS)
Measurement confounds
IV Confounds
Subject confounds
Setting confounds
Types of Measurement confounds
Observer Drift
Reactivity
Observer bias
IV confounds
When IVs are complicated and given together in treatment package
Types of subject confounds
Maturation
Practice
Adaptation
Warm-up effects
Setting confounds
More common in natural settings than in controlled space, bootleg reinforcement
Confounding Variables
Uncontrolled factor that may exert influence on the dependent variable that is unexpected and not considered in planning
Examples of Confounding Varaibles
Earthquake, illness, power outage
Extreneous Variables
Aspect of environment that must be held constant to prevent environmental variations. The researcher is usually aware of this.
Examples of Extraneous Variables
Lights, temp, noise, appearance of environment
External Validity
Results are generalized to other settings, subjects or behaviors. Relies on replication
Direct replication
Exact duplication of previous study, not common in applied settings
Systematic replication
Duplication with intentional changes to 1 or more features of a previous study.
Type 1 error
False positive
Type 2 error
False negative
Group
______________ designs randomly select a pool of subjects from the relevant population, divides the subjects into experimental and control groups, pretest, applies the IV to the experimental group and posttest
Single - subject
____________________ designs are used in behavior analysis