Top down approach to offender profiling

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/12

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

13 Terms

1
New cards

What is the aim of the top down approach?

To narrow down the list of likely suspects for a crime by analysing evidence from the crime scene

2
New cards

Where did this approach originate from?

America

3
New cards

Give an example of where the data used by the FBI comes from

Interviews

4
New cards

What is this data used to create?

Two criminal categories

5
New cards

What are the two criminal categories?

Organised

Disorganised

6
New cards

Characteristics of an organised offender x3

Usually married/have children

High IQ

Evidence of crime being planned

7
New cards

Characteristics of a disorganised offender x3

Usually live alone near the crime scene

Low IQ

Little evidence of planning - spontaneous crime

8
New cards

What do these categories correlate with?

Particular set of social/psychological characteristics related to the individual

9
New cards

Name the 4 stages which make up an FBI profile construction

Data assimilation

Crime scene classification

Crime reconstruction

Profile generation

10
New cards

A03 Strength: Research support for organised category

Canter et al

Smallest space analysis used

Found subset of behaviors matching organised offenders

Key components of approach has validity

11
New cards

A03 Strength: Can be adapted to other types of crime

Recently applied to burglary

led to 85% increase in solved crimes in the US

Adds 2 new categories : Interpersonal and opportunistic

Has wider application that originally assumed

12
New cards

A03 Limitation: Evidence for top down profiling was flawed

FBI agents did not select a random/large sample

Interviews were not standardised - each was different so not comparable

Approach doesn’t have a valid scientific basis

13
New cards

A03 Limitation: Multiple contrasting characteristics

Offenders may not fit into only one type of category

Organised-disorganised typology is more of a continuum

Approach can only be applied to a certain type of offender

Reduces generalisability