1/87
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Evolution
Genetic change across generations
Microevolution
changes in allele frequencies across generations
Small scale changes over short time frame
Macroevolution
Accumulation of microevolutionary changes such that a new group arises
Speciation
Large scale changes over long-time frames
Natural Selection
Increased survival and reproduction of some individuals compared to others based on differences in phenotype
specific type of change that leads to evolution
mechanism of change
acts on INDIVIDUALS
results in changes in allele frequencies over generations
Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Natural Selection
Variation → individuals with varied phenotype exist in population
Heritability → trait is somehow genetic and based down to offspring
the proportion of trait variation explained by inheritance
the degree to which parental phenotypes predict offspring phenotypes
Differential Success → individuals with different traits have different survival/reproductive success (fitness)
Individuals with certain traits survive or reproduce more successfully than others
Fitness
An organism’s ability to survive and reproduce in a particular environment
Phenotype
An organism’s observable traits/characteristics
Physical
Ex: eye color
Behavioral
Ex: bird songs
Physiological
Ex: blood type
Genotype
A genotype is an organism’s genetic makeup
specific set of genes or alleles it carries
Absolute Fitness vs Relative Fitness
Absolute fitness → actually number of offspring that survive and reproduce
Relative fitness → absolute fitness of / population mean fitness
Both terms can be used to describe one organism or a group of individuals with the same phenotype/genotype
When comparing the success of a phenotypes in different populations, compare the ratios between mean absolute fitness of each phenotype
Ex: 1:5 → 2:10
same level of fitness
Breeder’s Equation
Predicts phenotypic change
R = h2S
R → response to selection; magnitude of phenotype shift between generations
new mean - old mean
difference AFTER reproduction
h2 → heritability
h2 is a term by itself (no square function)
S → strength of selection
magnitude of phenotypic difference between breeders and full population
Breeder phenotype - Average phenotype
difference BEFORE reproduction
Altruism
Behavior that reduces individual fitness and increases the fitness of others
Ex: Alarm Calls
Altruism is supported by natural selection when:
Fitness lost by altruist is less than fitness gained by recipient
Kin selection
selection that favors behaviors that increase the reproductive success of relatives
Ex: raising offspring in groups
Inclusive Fitness
the sum of an individual’s own fitness and its contribution to the fitness of relatives
Directional selection
Phenotype at one extreme has highest fitness: mean trends toward that extreme
graph shifts left/right, toward the extreme with greater fitness
Stabilizing selection
Mean phenotype has the highest fitness
mean stays the same, variation is reduced
graph shifts towards center
Disruptive (Diversifying) selection
phenotypes at both extremes have higher fitness than the mean
Bimodal pattern emerges
Frequency Dependent Selection
Phenotype is beneficial based on its frequency in a population, not what is actual is
In other selection types what is beneficial is the phenotype itself
Positive Frequency Dependence
The most common phenotype is most benefited
Negative Frequency Dependence
The rarest phenotype is most benefited
phenotype fitness graph is a “zigzag” → oscillation
Balancing Selection
Selection that maintains phenotypic variation in a population
Patterns of selection that maintain variation include (both extremes still exist):
Diversifying/Disruptive selection
Negative frequency dependent selection
Spatial Variation
Type of balancing selection
phenotypic variation is maintained by phenotypes having different fitness in different locations
which phenotype is beneficial changes in different parts of a species’ range
Temporal Variation
Type of balancing selection
phenotypic variation is maintained by phenotypes having different fitness in different time periods
which phenotype is beneficial changes in different time periods
Lingering deleterious phenotypes
Recessive disease alleles are not eliminated from populations by selection because:
Carriers are not harmed by the disease; they can pass down the recessive allele to their offspring
Carrier fitness unaffected
Disease has delayed onset
phenotype is expressed AFTER reproductive years → does not affect fitness
Ex: Huntington’s Disease
Heterozygous advantage
Carriers of disease might have higher fitness over both homozygous types → maintains deleterious allele in population
Ex: Sickle cell disease in regions with high malaria prevalence
Constraints of Natural Selection
Environmental change
Which phenotypes are beneficial are not always the same. Natural selection can only favor which traits are currently beneficial
Environmental changes occur faster than natural selection can operate
Laws of Physics
Limits which phenotypes are physically possible
Ex: insect size is dependent of rate of oxygen diffusion
Evolutionary history
An organism's evolutionary history influences which phenotype options are available
Organisms inherit traits from their ancestors, cannot be “redesigned” from scratch
Trade offs
Phenotypes beneficial in one context can be harmful in another
Resources are limited, certain traits that may increase an organism’s fitness may be too energetically costly to maintain
Lack of genetic diversity
Natural selection does not create new phenotypes, it can only act on preexisting variation
a population can lack phenotypes that would grant them higher fitness in their environment; natural selection cannot change that
“Levels” of Genetics
Genome → all the genetic material an organism carries
Chromosome → long strand of DNA containing 100s-1000s of genes
Gene → sections of DNA that codes for a particular protein
Alleles → different versions of a gene
DNA Structure
Comprised of 4 nitrogenous bases that form hydrogen bonds with each other
A:T (U in mRNA) → 2 hydrogen bonds
C:G → 3 hydrogen bonds
Double helix structure for stability
Coils up around histones, forming chromosomes
Central Dogma
Flow of genetic information
DNA → RNA → Protein
Transcription
DNA → RNA
Occurs in cell nucleus
DNA unwinds, RNA polymerase builds mRNA against Antisense strand (template)
new mRNA is identical to sense strand (U in place of T)
“Change in script”
Translation
RNA → protein
Occurs in cytoplasm with help of tRNA
ribosome reads mRNA in codons, set of 3 base pairs
tRNA carries over amino acid that corresponds to codon
“Change in language”
Gene Structure
Coding region → contains instructions for making proteins
Regulatory region → determines how often a protein is built
how many times transcription/translation occurs
Start with AUG, end with end codon
Wobble
Multiple codons produce the same amino acids
redundancy in codons
Substitution Mutations
Substitution: one or more nucleotides are exchanged
Missense mutation → amino acid replaced by a different one
Nonsense mutation → amino acid replaced by a stop
Synonymous mutation → amino acid unaffected by nucleotide exchange
Frameshift Mutations
Frameshift mutation → alters all subsequent codons
Insertion: one or more nucleotides are added
Deletion: one or more nucleotides are deleted
Human Genetic Variation
Average nucleotide diversity
The average proportion of nucleotide differences between a randomly chosen pair of individuals
Among humans 1/1000 → 99.9% similarity
Between humans and chimps 1/100 → 99% similarity
Models of Inheritance in the 1800s
Blending model
parental characteristics are irreversible blended in succeeding generations
Particulate model
parental traits are passed down through genes (discrete particles)
dominant vs recessive traits
Mendel’s Pea Experiments
Experimental method
cross pollinated two true breeding plants with contrasting traits
observed traits of F1 and F2 generations
breed plants to have hundreds-thousands of offspring
Conclusions
rejected blended model hypothesis
discovered simple/complete dominance
recessive vs dominant alleles
Mendel’s Pea Traits
Discovered many traits that followed the “pea model”
Parental generation: homozygous dominant and homozygous recessive
F1: all have dominant trait (all heterozygous)
F2: 3 dominant, 1 recessive
1 homozygous dominant, 2 heterozygous, 1 homozygous recessive
Mendelian inheritance applies to: Single gene, 2 alleles with simple/complete dominance
Law of Segregation
when any individual produces gametes, the two copies of a gene separate so that each gamete receives only one copy
keeps the number of chromosomes per individuals the same across generations
Law of Independent Assortment
Alleles of different genes assort independently of one another during gamete formation
Ex: inheriting the dominant allele for color does not impact what allele you’d inherent for shape
Meiosis
During metaphase 1, chromosomes line up randomly (independent assortment)
allows for many different combinations of alleles in gametes
Calculating Probabilities
General rules
“and” → multiple probabilities (multiply)
“or” → add probabilities (add)
For heterozygous genotypes, recall:
Parents can give offspring different combinations of alleles (add probabilities)
Ex: If offspring is Yyrr and parents are YyRr…
parent 1: Yr / parent 2: yr
OR
parent 1: yr / parent 2: Yr
Types of Dominance
Simple/Complete Dominance
a single dominant allele produces the dominant phenotype
homozygous dominant and heterozygous genotypes → same phenotype
Incomplete Dominance
heterozygous phenotype is intermediate between the two homozygous phenotypes
Codominance
heterozygote’s phenotype is both homozygous phenotypes expressed fully
Pedigree Analysis
Determining if phenotype is dominant or recessive:
Recessive → two unaffected individuals produce an affected child
Dominant → prove that it’s not recessive
possibility: unaffected individuals produce unaffected children
Linked Genes
If genes are located on the same chromosome, we will not observe expected ¼ ratio of all gametes/phenotypes
Parental phenotypes and nonrecombinant gametes will be more common
Crossing Over
Linked genes do not assort independently. However, recombinant alleles can still be produced through crossing over.
Crossing-over allows genes located on the same chromosome to separate (recombination)
Chromosomes physically exchange DNA
The frequency of crossing over producing recombinant gametes depends on the distance between the target genes
genes farther away from each other → more frequent separation
genes closer together → less frequent separation
Sex-Linked Inheritance
Females are less likely to express sex-linked disorders because they have two X-chromosomes
a dominant X can mask the impact of a harmful recessive X
When considering X-linked traits, male genotypes → hemizygous
Pleiotropy
Mode of inheritance where one gene controls multiple traits
Polygenic Inheritance
One trait is additively controlled by many genes
Ex: color genes
Environmental Influences on Phenotypes
Environmental conditions influence phenotype
Ex: Soil pH and flower color
Quantitative Traits
Phenotypes are continuous, not discrete categories
Influence of both genes and environment
Ex: Human height
multiple genes, nutrition
Epistasis
multiple genes interact to determine phenotype
Ex: Labrador coat color
Black/Brown Gene: Black shows complete dominance over brown
Extension Gene: recessive trait lacks pigment in the fur (yellow)
genes are not additive but affect the expression of one another
Population
An interbreeding group of organisms of the same species occurring in the same place and time
Evolution acts on populations
Changes in allele frequencies across generations
Changes in mean and variance of traits across generations
Allele frequencies
proportion of a particular allele across all individuals of a population
Number of X alleles / Number of total alleles
Genotype frequencies
proportion of individuals of a particular genotype in a population
Number of XX individuals / Number of total individuals
Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium
In non-evolving conditions, population reach and stay at equilibrium
Used as a baseline expectation for comparisons → null hypothesis
Deviations from HWE can give us insight into what is happening within a population
5 Assumptions of HWE
No mutations
No natural selection
No gene flow (migration)
No genetic drift (requires infinitely large population size)
Random mating
Determining if a Population is in HWE
Find observed genotype frequencies
Use calculated genotype frequencies to find allele frequencies
Use calculated allele frequencies to find the expected genotype frequencies under HWE
p2 + 2pq + q2
Deviations between observed genotype frequencies and expected genotype frequencies = population not in HWE
HWE with More than 2 alleles
Frequency of homozygous genotype always → f(allele)2
Frequency of heterozygous genotype always → 2 x f(allele1) x f(allele2)
Mutations
Mutations generate new alleles, provide variation for selection to act upon
beneficial
deleterious
neutral
Possible “paths” of Mutations
gets removed by natural selection
increases in frequency via natural selection
can become fixed in small populations via genetic drift
can be transferred to other populations through gene flow
Gene flow
migration of genes into new populations
genes can travel without organisms have to move
ex: pollination
Genetic Drift
Random chance events that cause allele frequencies to fluctuate unpredictably from one generation to the next
More prevalent in small populations
fewer chances for rare alleles to get passed on
Reduces genetic diversity
one allele can become fixed while another becomes lost
Founder Effect
occurs when a new population is created from a few individuals from the same initial population
new population has less diversity because it was created by a small portion of the original population
carries only a subset of the genetic variation present in the original population
less diverse
species as a whole still has the genetic diversity of the original population to lean back on
Genetic Bottlenecks
occur when a species’ total population size is severely reduced
much smaller population → less genetic diversity
no background genetic diversity to lean on, small population is all that is left of the species
Consequences of Genetic Drift
loss of genetic diversity
alleles become fixed (freq = 1)
alleles lost (freq = 0)
Increase in homozygosity
Possible increase in deleterious recessive conditions
if deleterious allele is the one that gets fixed
Increased susceptibility to future stressors
Ex: pathogens can more easily harm population since everyone has similar genotypes
Non-Random Mating
organisms have a preference for who they mate with
Alleles do not have equal chance of uniting with each other
Inbreeding
preference for similar genotypes/phenotypes/relatives
closely genetically related
Outbreeding
preference for different genotypes/phenotypes
Consequences of Inbreeding
Reduction in heterozygous genotypes
Increase in homozygous genotypes
Concerning increase in homozygous recessive genotypes
deleterious recessive alleles can become more common if genetically similar individuals reproduce
higher chance of them both having the same deleterious recessive allele
Allele frequency can remain the same, but GENOTYPE frequency changes
Natural Selection - Dominant vs Recessive Alleles
Natural selection operates on phenotypes
When a dominant allele is beneficial, it increases in frequency quickly
Fitness increase for homozygous dominant and heterozygous individuals
When a recessive allele is beneficial, it increases in frequency slowly
Fitness increase for homozygous recessive individuals only
Impacts of Hardy-Weinberg Violations
Inbreeding
less heterozygotes, more homozygotes
genotype frequencies
Outbreeding
more heterozygotes, less homozygotes
genotype frequencies
Genetic drift
One allele increases in frequency at the expense of another
One homozygous increases, other decreases
If genetic drift is a possibility, ignoring fluctuations in the heterozygote
Other possibilities
Increased frequency of genotype
gene flow → immigration of individuals with genotype
selection in favor of genotype
Decreased frequency of genotype
gene flow → emigration of individuals with genotype
selection against genotype
Interspecific Interactions
between individuals from two different species
can increase or decrease a specie’s carrying capacity
can increase or decrease a species’ fundamental niche
realized niche
Communities
Groups of interacting species occurring together in space and time
Keystone species
Have an effect on community composition that is disproportionately large compared to their abundance
Have a big effect despite low abundance
Trophic Casacade
Indirect effects of predators on biomass at least two trophic levels away
Predators can increase the biomass of plants by eating herbivores
Predators can decrease the biomass of plants by eating other predators that eat herbivores
Foundation Species
Affect other species because of their high biomass and habitat forming characteristics
have big effect because of their abundance/size
Can be benefited or unaffected by the species they facilitate
Ex: Trees, corals
Competitive exclusion principle
two species that use the same resources in the same way cannot coexist; one will drive the other to extinction
In order for two species to coexist, they must differ in the way they use resources / use different resources
Intraspecific competition is strong relative to interspecific competition
Resource Partitioning
major way competitors can coexist in the same ecosystem.
Occurs when competing species use different resources or use the same resources in different ways
small resource overlap
competition exists, but it's minimized
each species' carrying capacity is still lower than it would be alone
Species can coexist when they partition resources
Intraspecific competition is strong relative to interspecific competition
Niche Utilization Curves
Graph of niches in terms of performance across a range
The overlap of different species’ niche utilization curves represents their degree of competition
Less overlap → more likely to coexist
Obligate Mutualism
Type of mutualism where both species need depend on each other for survival
Facultative mutualism
Type of mutualism where the interaction between two species is not required for either of them to survive
Can be thought of as two separate commensalisms
Outcomes of relationship vary with environment
No stress → changes to exploitation
Positive interaction
Interaction in which at least one species benefits and none are harmed
Involves one species that is resistant to a stress (a facilitator) locally reducing that stress
benefits species that are susceptible to that stress
Strength of positive interactions vary with intensity of stress
Strong in high stress environments
Weak in low stress environments
Can switch to negative
Predator-prey oscillations
Some natural populations of predators and prey display coupled oscillations (stable coexistence)
both intraspecific competition and predation contribute to stabilization of predator-prey cycles
predators AND competition among prey act together to stabilize population dynamics and prevent extinction
5 Givens on Pathogen-Host interactions
Disease is caused by organisms (pathogens)
Pathogens can be transmitted between individuals (hosts) either:
directly
through the environment
Hosts resist pathogens either:
by chemical defense
through an immune system
Immunity can be:
innate (genetic)
acquired (immune memory)
Many pathogens are host specific
infecting only 1 species or one genotype with a species
Disease Outbreak
Outbreaks occur if the fraction of the population that is infected is increasing
S > d/B
susceptible individuals > recovery rate / transmission rate
Threshold Density
S > / (recovery rate / transmission rate)
outbreaks end once S drops below threshold
restart once S rises → immigration and births
Strategies for Disease Management
Decrease transmission rate
masking
Increase recovery rate
prescribe medication to infected individuals
Decrease number of susceptible individuals
vaccination
Herd Immunity
Reducing frequency of S so that the rate of new infections is much lower than the recovery rate will effectively allow even those that aren’t vaccinated to benefit
Immunizations reduce S
S becomes R without becoming infected
The vaccination rates needed to achieve herd immunity depends on a disease's rate of transmission
If S increases because of vaccine opt outs, herd immunity can be lost
Character Displacement
Evolution toward niche divergence as a result of interspecific competition
If two species have somewhat overlapping resource pools, individuals that consume resources from the regions without overlap will have higher fitness
More intraspecific competition than interspecific
Phenotypes in allopatry differ from those in sympatry
Host-Pathogen Evolution
Hosts can evolve in response to pathogens
Susceptible individuals die, leaving resistant individuals with higher fitness
resistant allele frequency increases across generation
Pathogens evolve in response to hosts as well
Evolving to be less lethal is favored when population density is low
Killing hosts too quickly decreases rate of transmission