1/37
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Colonialism in practice
Econ: human and material exploitation
Political: militarised geographical occupation, overthrow political leader, imposition of new political leader & administration controlled by metropole
Cultural: social/radial hierarchies, proliferation of specialised knowledges about colonised subjects, beliefs, practices, physiognomies
Myths’ of Colonialism (the stories former colonial powers like to tell themselves)
a)Colonialism ultimately benefitted the colonised (cultural improvement; technological advances)
b)Colonialism ‘cost’ colonial powers more than it benefitted them (administration as well as significant investments in infrastructure)
c)Former colonies needed to prove their capacity for responsible self-governance
How did ‘Rich’ Countries become ‘Rich’
Niall Ferguson (2011). Civilisation: The West and the Rest. “6 killer apps” that put us ahead of other societies:
Competition – Decentralized political and economic structures that fostered innovation.
Science – The systematic pursuit of knowledge and technological advancement.
Property rights – Legal systems that protected private ownership and incentivized investment.
Medicine – Advances in public health and medical science that extended life spans.
Consumer society – Mass production and consumption that stimulated economies.
Work ethic – A cultural emphasis on discipline and hard work, often tied to Protestantism.
...However colonial expansion by major European powers coincides with other salient developments:
(1736-) ‘The Gin Craze’ —> need to remove ‘undesirable’ populations from metropole? Rather than showcasing "work ethic," chaotic and vulnerable underbelly of Western society
(1478-1834) Spanish Inquisition —> Expanding (and/or escaping) persecution in New World. intolerant, authoritarian religious enforcement, contradicting Ferguson’s idea of a West that prospered through science, reason, and liberalism
(1350 BCE - 1980) Smallpox - European imperial expansion was hugely assisted by accidental biological warfare on indigenous populations - 90% killed
Colonial international division of labour
IDL, up until at least 1970s
System of ‘cash crops’ – sugar, cocoa, tea, coffee, rubber
Raw materials extracted in the colonies → transferred to colonial powers for processing into industrialised products→ ‘value added’ → consumed/exported
Deliberately protectionist policies – tariffs dropped on imports of raw materials, raised significantly on foreign manufactured goods
Britain only adopted ‘free trade’ in 1860, once it had acquired a technological and industrial monopoly in places like the Indian subcontinent
Malachy Postlethwayt (d. 1767)
a British economist and staunch advocate of the slave trade
“The African trade is so very beneficial to Great Britain, so essentially necessary to the very being of Her colonies, that without it neither could we flourish nor they long subsist.”
How did the slave trade work?
Europe, cheaply manufactured goods highly sought after in Africa —> Africa
European goods traded with African traders for slaves
European ships w/ slaves —> go across “middle passage” to reach the americas (6-10 weeks)
Slaves auctioned off in Americas to work for mostly plantations
Cotton, rum, coffee and tobacco produced by slaves in Americas —> Europe
European traders sell these luxury goods for huge profits & become richer
no labour costs to luxury
In the colonies, labour costs
were kept low by slave labour, indentureship and penal servitude on plantations dedicated to ‘cash crops.’
This prevented the emergence of (potentially more demanding, self-organising) free wage labourers, which predominated in industrialising nations
Low wages in the colonies —> low purchasing power
Therefore, cheap raw materials, produced by cheap
labour were exported to metropole to avail of “value-added consumption” (due to higher wages and greater purchasing power)
WHY DID SLAVERY ‘END’?
Economic motives: it ceased to be as profitable and interfered with the ‘free market’ for newly emergent capitalists
Moral Reasons: The growing prominence of abolitionist movements in slave-owning populations, led by Christian evangelicals
Resistance Movements: Uprisings from enslaved peoples (The Haitian Revolution); Black Abolitionists like Olaudah Equiano, Ottobah Cugoano and Jeanne Odo
When did slavery “end”?
it didn’t really end:
modern slavery in American prisons - largst maximum-security prison built on old plantation in Louisiana.
Forced to work for pennies or nothing at all. Prison-raised cattle sold to McDonald's, Walmart and Cargill
Amount of people in modern slavery
World wide, 49.6 million people in slavery
22.8 Male
26.7 Female
Majority in Asia and the Pacific (29.3mil)
Colonisation
________ involves the actual movement of people, settlers,
administrative systems onto the land of the dispossessed, and
the takeover and direct rule of that territory
Imperialism
________ involves political and/or economic rule, without the direct take-over of the territory
Direct colonial rule (settlement) not always necessary, because economic and social relations of dependency provide both captive labour as well as markets for the metropole’s industry and goods.
US military - colobialism or imperialism
US military - 750 bases in 80 countries. 173000 troops deployed in 159 countries.
Japan: 120 bases, 53 713 troops
Germany: 119 bases, 33 948 troops
South Korea: 73 bases, 26 414 troops
ORIENTALISM
Literary, scientific and cultural texts which consolidated certain ways of seeing and thinking, thereby helped maintain colonial ‘supremacy
Orientalism crucial to European self-conception: irrational/rational, feminine/masculine, barbaric/civilised, lazy/hard-working, sensual/disciplinedOrientalism is the lens through which the ‘other’ was viewed, constructed and controlled
The Orient has become the ‘distorting mirror’ by, and through, which Europe defined itself and celebrated its superiority (Said 2003).
( Western cultures wrote about ‘The Orient’, India and the ‘Arab World’ in a stylised, stereotypical way which form the basis of western ‘knowledge’ about the East)
Words & origins
Bungalow - Bangla (house in bengal style)
Jungle - jangal
Bandana - badnu (deforative tie-dye), bandhana (tying up)
Cushy - khushi (pleasure, or cushions)
Pyjama - payajama
Cot - khāt(bed)
Juggernaut - jagannath yatra (religious procession in Puri, Orissa state, devoted to lord Jagannath)
Avatar - avatāra (to cross down from heaven)
Thug - thag
Pundit - pandit (scholar or priest)
Shampoo - champo (to squeeze, massage)
Punch - panch (5 ingredient drink)
Loot - lut (ransack, violent plunder)
John Stuart Mill (1806-1873)
East India Company Colonial Administrator, “examiner of Indian Correspondence”
“people who are incapable of taking care of themselves must be protected from their own actions & from external injury”
Infantilisation of whole societies based on race
“despotism good for development for barbarians”
East India company
EIC - founded 31 Dec 1600, based in London
in just over 40 years, masters of almost all the subcontinent with inhabitants 50-60mil
Larger in size and population of the biggest european countries
1803 - captured Mughal capital of Delhi
200 000 in military (twice the size of British army)
1825 - parliament started opposing EIC due to its dangerous power
EIC transported opium to China & fought the opium wars
Shipped chinese tea to Boston which was subsequently poured into the harbour. Fear that EIC would take part of the war, deployed by UK
1857 - massive rebellin against eployers, 10 000 ish suspected rebels killed along Ganges river
Related to many famines - Indian famines, Bengal famines, East Punjab, Orissa
The difference principle
John Rawls
Evaluating the justice of the divison of goods
Any inequalities in the division of goods must be to maximum benefit of the disadvantaged
Disadvantaged have more than they would if resources were equally divided? This is a just system, no problems here
Focus on defining disadvantage by primary goods: income & wealth
something about india
POST-COLONIALISM
formal political independence
But formal independence can coexist with cultural, political and economic dependencies on the former colonial power, making it hard to decide if a country really is post-colonial
Post-colonial theory seeks to explain why political independence has not lead to cultural, political and economic emancipation
Cultural colonisation
“in whose soul an inferiority complex has been created by the death and burial of its local cultural originality” (Frantz Fanon. 1967. Black Skin, White Masks: p. 18)
system of knowledge that objectified the colonised —> control, legitimise colonialism.
Colonial work justified by portrayals of Africans or Hindus as savages in need of harsh discipline.
Once colonies were established, new stereotypes arose of impulsive, childlike natives requiring paternal ‘guardianship’
TLDR:
- inferiority built on the death/denial of one’s culture & origins
- objectifying colonial subjects by associating negative traits to them, stereotypes —> “they need to be disciplined”
LEGACIES OF COLONIALISM
o National boundaries of former colonies.
o Educational and religious systems
o Legal traditions; policing practices and military hierarchies.
o Entrenched patterns of economic dependency
o Globalised usage of languages English, French, Spanish, Portuguese
o Status hierarchies based upon race and ethnicity
Algerian War of Independence (1954 - 1962)
The main idea of the theory of justice
John Rawls (1921-2002)
Justice should be a part of basic structure of society
Free and rational persons concerned to further their own interests would accept in an initial position of equality as defining the the fundamental terms of their association -
hypothetically, make decisions as a group without your personal identity, ignore it (veil of ignorance). make decision best for everyone
A group must decide what they deem to be just/unjust
How Europe underdeveloped Africa
Book by Walter Rodney (1973)
“European Colonialism was a net positive for Africa” reality
built schools, railroads, hospitals - negligible amounts, came much later on during colonialism (after the last war soc policy built),
African independence health, housing & education much better than recently independent states
Social policy occurred from capitalism in Europe - didn't reach Africa though
Portugal “we civilised Mozambique, Angola and Guinea” - didn't train a single African doctor under their rule in Mozambique, low life expectancy in East Angola, Portuguese admitted Guinea neglected
Amenities given to colonies primarily used on white settlers
Healthcare Africa
Algeria:
white ppl: 39/1000 birth deaths
Poc: 170/1000 birth deaths
African hospitals:
4000 Europeans: 12 hospitals
40 million Africans: 52 hospitals
Outbreaks of disease in mines, hundreds died & weren't paid enough to eat properly while the companies flourished. 65% of children died before the age of 2. Most people died of Tuberculosis. 1 doctor for 40 000 patients
Welfare and funding Africa
diamond mining grew as early as 1912, poverty deepened
Most wealthy colonies given some privileges
Giving basic health & literacy in industrial contexts = better workers
Hospitals built only for workers, places where there was no money to be gained were neglected
This is why Nigeria, Uganda and the gold coast were better off than Chad, Dahomey & Tanganyika
Travel colonial impacts Africa
railway & roads only existed for import/export & troops for enacting further oppression
No communication means - can't talk to friends, can't do trade of African goods within the continent
No roads between colonies/within colonies which woukd support African development, only for extracting gold or cottonor going to the sea
Want something built faster? Punish the people working with lashes
Lack of equipment —> much was built by hand by slaves, although funded by the west: Nairobi airport (Embakasi), Congo railroad from Brazzaville to Pointe Noire
Finance and African colonialism
banks didn't lend locally, Credit to Natives ordinance 1931 discouraged lending to Africans
Insurance companies only catered to white settlers & capitalist firms
Currency boards and central banks denied Africa access to its own funds created by exports - Britain, France and Belgium represented African loans to and capital investment in Europe
colonial reserves in metropolitan currencies
“Europe invested so much money into Africa!” That money used came from exploiting Africa
“ Hospitals, school etc in Africa paid by French & British taxpayers!” They got a SLIVER of money compared to what you earned.
Colonial Development and Welfare (CD&W)
1930, riots in West Indies due to African descendants treatment left stranded there, suffering
The Royal commission investigated thr grievances
Findings not published during thr war bc it was too similar to the fascism Brits were fighting
1940 began process, then 1944 CD & W got funds etc
French counterpart: FIDES
Discourse: “uncivilised natives needed welfare, Africa needed to be made just by becoming Christian”
Most money from both were not used for developing Africa - 1% & 0.5% respectively allocated to industries
Barclays set up funds in this, also many high profile ppl took part
“We need colonies so we have more money than Russia & USA” mr Bevin
CD & W + FIDES both tried to hide the visciousness of the colonialism
SDOM - Financial Societies for Development of Overseas Territories
large government subventions
Private capitalists interested in oil in Africa
Africa brought to the 20th century by Europe discourse
“Africa was modernised by Europe” - no, did not pick up capitalism.
capitalist societies had bourgeoisie & proletariat - cannot be found within African society necessarily, Africans barred from capitalist gains as traders or owning ginnaries - only Indian & European descent reigned in those territories
Africans barred from gaining skill, employment involved in technical expertise
African industrialisation prevented by Europeans, most valuable labour done outside Africa
South African saying: “ thr white man has no kin, his kin is money”
We would be complaining about capitalism being so brutal rather than colonialism if Africa had become ‘modernised’ by capitalism
exhaustion of land:
Exploitation of thr land - gold mining (Tanganyika) and bauxite (Guinea, for aluminum) mined & exported from the land
No agricultural technical development on par with the West, exhaustion of soil due to agricultural pursuits
Wages and African exploitation
paid VERY little, took 50 days of work to be able to afford 3 meters of the cotton cloth they harvested
Peasants had to pay for their own tools, paying the middlemen
Unskilled labour —> valued less than European labour
Not permitted to acquire tools which were higher tech, shortening time working
The white saviour narrative
Ngoni & Yao and Samori ‘tribes’ were killing each other, Livingstone and Stanley saved them - not true
Nationalism discourse
“ Europeans brought nationalism to Africa”
Africa had states & groups before colonial times
some larger/across colonies as well in 19th century
Post colonial countries did pick up on some Euro-nationalist characteristics, but they could've reached these conclusions without Europe
Freedom and power discourse
“colonialism brought Africans freedom”
no, just because people had wages doesn't mean it was good
Limited choices of what they could do/engage with is NOT the same as freedom! - just because they coukd be police or interpreters didn't mean they were free
Just because Africans took initiative or tricked slave owners didn't mean they actually had any systemic sway
post-colonial theory
____ seeks to explain why political independence
—/—> cultural, political and economic emancipation
A Theory of Justice (1971)
John Rawls (1921-2002)
Colonialism & companies in Africa
Many companies built capital off of the slave trade - Barclay's bank, Wroms et Compagnie
Unilever (The Niger Company) exploited people, monopolied slave trade
Diamang - diamond mining company, shareholders in USA, Portugal and Belgium —> invested money into those countries