lecture 7- social influence

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/26

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

27 Terms

1
New cards

social influence

refers to many ways people affect one another

  • involves changes in attitudes and behavior resulting from comments/actions/presence of others

2
New cards

social learning theory

many animals, including humans, can learn by watching others

3
New cards

chameleon effect

unconscious mimicry of the nonverbal mannerisms of an interaction partner

  • Chartrand and Bargh (1999) → Chameleon effect study

4
New cards

group pressure (Asch, 1956)

“what circumstances lead people to follow group pressure?”

  • participants were asked same question in group of confederates, but all confederates responded w/ wrong answer

  • results → 35% conformed overall, 75% conformed at least once

5
New cards

conformity

a change in behavior to be in line w/ the majority

6
New cards

why do people conform?

  • informational influence

  • normative influence

7
New cards

informational influence

social influence where individuals change beliefs or behaviors b/c they perceive others as having more accurate info, knowledge, or expertise

  • others provide info

  • leads to internalization (private acceptance)

8
New cards

normative influence

type of social influence where individuals conform to norms, beliefs, or behaviors of a group to gain social acceptance or avoid social disapproval

  • we feel pressure to fit in (try to be normal)

  • leads to public compliance (no internalization)

    • ex: Asch study

9
New cards

when do people conform?

  • group size

  • unamity

  • anonymity

  • status and experience

  • culture

  • gender

10
New cards

group size

3-4 people allows greatest conformity

  • Milgram’s Looking at Nothing study

    • less people looking up → only 40% of passer-bys conformed

    • 4 people looking up → 80% conformed (also looked up)

11
New cards

unamity

if there is even 1 dissenter, conformity decreases

  • ex: Asch studies (when one person dissented, conformity dropped to 5%)

12
New cards

anonymity

responding in front of group members makes conformity more likely

  • if responding anonymously, less likely to conform

13
New cards

status and experience

if group members are high in status and experience, more likely to conform in front of them

14
New cards

culture

interdependent cultures → more susceptible to information and normative social influence

15
New cards

gender

  • women conform more in stereotypically male domains

  • men conform more in stereotypically female domains

16
New cards

compliance

responding favorably to a direct request (not a demand) made by another person

17
New cards

compliance techniques

  • foot-in-the-door effect

  • door-in-the-face effect

  • low-balling

  • reciprocity

  • appeal to norms (descriptive/prescriptive norms)

18
New cards

foot-in-the-door effect

if someone agrees to a small request first, they’re more likely to comply later w/ a larger request

  • Freedman and Fraser (1966) - Drive Carefully Study

    • no initial request → 17% agreed to big request

    • small request first (petition) → 76% agreed

19
New cards

door-in-the face effect

if someone turns down a large request first, they’re more likely to comply w/ a more reasonable request

  • Blood Donor Study

    • donate blood for long-term? then: donate blood tmr? → 50% agreed

    • only: donate blood tmr? → 32% agreed

20
New cards

low-balling

people who agree to an initial request maintain commitment when the request increases

  • Cialdini et al. (1978)

    • agreement increased from 24% to 56% w/ initial commitment

21
New cards

reciprocity

the expectation that people will help those who have helped them

  • tit for tat

22
New cards

descriptive norms

what are most people actually doing?

  • actually doing, not what they should be doing

23
New cards

prescriptive norms

what should people be doing?

  • what they should be doing, not what they are actually doing

24
New cards

obedience

a change in behavior in response to a command from someone in a position of authority

25
New cards

Milgram (1974)

obedience study

  • cover story: effects of punishment on learning

    • instructed to give shocks for incorrect responses, 15 volts to 450 volts

    • results → 65% went to 450 volts

26
New cards

altering obedience

  • characteristics of authority figure - strength and distance

  • characteristics of situation

    • emotional distance (remote shock = 100%, hold hand to shock plate = 30%, other flipping switch = 93%)

    • institutional authority (higher authority/reputation = more obedience)

    • presence of resistors (reduces obedience)

27
New cards

reactance

a motive to protect one’s sense of freedom; arises when freedom feels threatened

  • occurs when we feel someone is trying to limit choices or decisions

    • response to a threat to our freedom