3.2. Axial flight

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/60

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

61 Terms

1
New cards

conservation laws formulas (axial flight)

formulas

<p>formulas</p>
2
New cards

formula for the induced velocity at the rotor disk in hover

formula

<p>formula</p>
3
New cards

we need to put 10kg in hover. which rotor do you choose?

the biggest one

4
New cards

how can one relate useful data across different scales? e.g. data from a scale model test in a wind tunnel to a full scale component?

  • Buckingham-Pi theorem

    • based on dimensional homogeneity

    • # of dimensional terms = # of independent variables - # of fundamental dimensions

    • choice of repeating variables is not unique → suggested choice for fluid dynamic analyses

      • length, scale, kinematic variable and dynamic variable

    • considering rotor flow:

      • five variables: v_i, v_tip=Omega*R, rho, T, A=pi*R²

      • three fundamental dimensions: mass, length and time

5
New cards

rotor coefficents: names and formulas

  • thrust coef

  • power coef

  • torque coef

<ul><li><p>thrust coef</p></li><li><p>power coef</p></li><li><p>torque coef</p></li></ul><p></p>
6
New cards

non-dimensional coefficents formulas (rotor coefficents)

formulas

<p>formulas</p>
7
New cards

inflow ratio formula

formula

<p>formula</p>
8
New cards

development and formula to relate power coefficent to thrust coefficent

formula

<p>formula</p>
9
New cards

experimental observations:

  • experimental data is positively offset from momentum theory prediction

  • higher “slope” observed in experimental data at high thrust coefficents

<ul><li><p>experimental data is positively offset from momentum theory prediction</p></li><li><p>higher “slope” observed in experimental data at high thrust coefficents</p></li></ul><p></p>
10
New cards

regarding the higher “slope” observed in experimental data at high thrust coefficents, how do you correct it?

  • with the induced power factor

  • estimating the profile power

11
New cards

induced power factor:

  • symbol

  • characteristics

  • formula

  • k

  • characteristics

    • non-uniform flow

    • tip losses

    • wake swirl

    • finite number of blades

  • formula

<ul><li><p>k</p></li><li><p>characteristics</p><ul><li><p>non-uniform flow</p></li><li><p>tip losses</p></li><li><p>wake swirl</p></li><li><p>finite number of blades</p></li></ul></li><li><p>formula</p></li></ul><p></p>
12
New cards

how to estimate/model k?

  • extract from experimental data

  • advanced rotor aero models (BEMT, etc.)

13
New cards

what do we need to do to estimate the profile power? formulas

consider the real form of a rotor

<p>consider the real form of a rotor</p>
14
New cards

how to estimate/model Cd0?

  • extract from experimental data

  • CDF

15
New cards

what if the required power is normalized by the ideal predicted power?

figure of merit:

formula

<p>figure of merit:</p><p>formula</p>
16
New cards

formula for area of blades

formula

<p>formula</p>
17
New cards

formula for area of disk

formula

<p>formula</p>
18
New cards

how do you estimate k and Cd0 from experiments?

with linearization

19
New cards

estimating k and Cd0 from experiments: linearization → development

development

<p>development</p>
20
New cards

modified power model formula

formula

<p>formula</p>
21
New cards

is power loading dimensional?

yes

22
New cards

what is the mathematical objective regarding rotor efficiency?

to express efficiencies as non-dimensional coefficents

23
New cards

figure of merit formula

formula

<p>formula</p>
24
New cards

what is figure of merit?

a non-dimensional measure of efficiency in hover

25
New cards

maximum value of FM? (and k)

0.86 (1.15)

26
New cards

two procedures regarding efficiency:

procedures

<p>procedures</p>
27
New cards

what is the FM value for most rotors?

between 0.7 and 0.8

28
New cards

what implies if FM is lower than 0.7

that the rotor has been optimized for non-hover conditions

29
New cards

what happens at low c_T?

profile power dominates

30
New cards

what happens at high c_T?

  • induced power dominates

  • an asymptote is expected at 1/l

  • profile losses begin to dominate again (stall)

31
New cards

FM formula depending on profile and induced power

formula

<p>formula</p>
32
New cards
<p>can we compare the rotors of these two rotorcrafts using FM?</p>

can we compare the rotors of these two rotorcrafts using FM?

  • No. Figure of Merit compares hover aerodynamic efficiency, not mission roles or operational purpose

  • FM is a valid measure to compare rotors only at the same (or very similar) DL!

33
New cards

alternative formulation of FM

formula

<p>formula</p>
34
New cards

what happens if FM (Figure of Merit) is a function of DL (Disk Loading)?

  • it’s possible to “manipulate” FM values by only increasing DL

  • this will increase the induced power consumption compared to the profile power

35
New cards

it is sought to ___ the ___ to produce a certain thrust, i.e. the ratio P/T

v_h formula

minimize DL, and consequently, ___ → this means…

minimize, power

v_i, a low rotor tip speed

<p>minimize, power</p><p>v_i, a low rotor tip speed</p>
36
New cards

how do we decide on a rotor tip speed?

set by the lowest speed that still satisfies noise, Mach and structural limits

37
New cards

can we optimize rotor size once a tip speed is selected?

yes. choose rotor radius to minimize disk loading while meeting thrust and design constraints

38
New cards

development for minimization formulation

development

<p>development</p>
39
New cards

where is the best rotor efficiency obtained? (and formula)

at the point of minimum DL and maximum FM

<p>at the point of minimum DL and maximum FM</p>
40
New cards

how can the optimum point be found? (and formula)

by looking at the maximum of c_T/c_P (or minimum c_P/c_T)

<p>by looking at the maximum of c_T/c_P (or minimum c_P/c_T)</p>
41
New cards

formulas when minimizing c_P/c_T

formulas

<p>formulas</p>
42
New cards

formulas for axial climb

formulas

<p>formulas</p>
43
New cards

(axial climb) as climb velocity increases, the induced velocity…

decreases

44
New cards

formulas for axial descent

formulas

<p>formulas</p>
45
New cards

axial descent: rotor flow states

  1. normal → hover, climb, V_D « V_h → 0<V_c

  2. vortex ring state → intermediate state: -2V_h<V_c<0

  3. turbulent wake → intermediate state: -2V_h<V_c<0

  4. windmill → V_c< -2V_h

46
New cards

intermediate states characteristics

  • a very complicated flow is observed

  • momentum theory is no longer valid

47
New cards

vortex ring state characteristics (setting for power)

  • the rotor pushes tip vortices down

  • oncoming air at the bottom pushes them up

  • vortices get trapped in a donut-shaped ring

  • the ring periodically grows and bursts

  • flow is highly unsteady

  • can only be empirically analized

<ul><li><p>the rotor pushes tip vortices down</p></li><li><p>oncoming air at the bottom pushes them up</p></li><li><p>vortices get trapped in a donut-shaped ring</p></li><li><p>the ring periodically grows and bursts</p></li><li><p>flow is highly unsteady</p></li><li><p>can only be empirically analized</p></li></ul><p></p>
48
New cards

turbulent state wake characteristics

  • rotor looks and behaves like a bluff body (or disk)

  • the vortices look like wakes behind the bluff body

  • the flow is unsteady, cannot be analyzed using momentum theory

  • need of empirical data

<ul><li><p>rotor looks and behaves like a bluff body (or disk)</p></li><li><p>the vortices look like wakes behind the bluff body</p></li><li><p>the flow is unsteady, cannot be analyzed using momentum theory</p></li><li><p>need of empirical data</p></li></ul><p></p>
49
New cards

windmill brake state

  • flow is well behaved

  • no trapped vortices, no wake

  • momentum theory can be used

<ul><li><p>flow is well behaved</p></li><li><p>no trapped vortices, no wake</p></li><li><p>momentum theory can be used</p></li></ul><p></p>
50
New cards

formula of axial flight induced velocity (MT)

formula

<p>formula</p>
51
New cards

formula of axial flight power requirements (MT)

formula

<p>formula</p>
52
New cards
<p>we observe a “zero power” point in the power curve. how is that possible? what is happening?</p>

we observe a “zero power” point in the power curve. how is that possible? what is happening?

Zero power occurs at autorotation:

  • airflow through the rotor drives part of the blade, while drag on other parts absorbs the same amount.

  • The torques cancel, so net power is zero, even though the rotor still produces lift.

53
New cards

different diagrams and formulas depending on forward flight normal, upwards, downwards

formulas

<p>formulas</p>
54
New cards

autorotation mechanics:

the NET power consumption is zero

55
New cards

estimation of the descent velocity in autorotation: development

development

<p>development</p>
56
New cards

what do all helicopters must demonstrate for certification?

autorotation

57
New cards

what are all helicopters equipped with?

freewheeling hubs, to disconnect the rotor from the powertrain during autorotation

58
New cards

how is the vertical velocity in autorotation reduced?

by adding a horizontal velocity component, i.e. forward flight

59
New cards

what is MT good for?

to estimate rotor performance

60
New cards

what can’t be MT used for?

for rotor design

61
New cards

what doesn’t MT take into account?

  • number of blades

  • airfoil characteristics (lift, drag, angle, zero lift)

  • blade planform (taper, sweep, root-cut-out)

  • blade twist distribution

  • compressibility effects