The success of Cons in 1885-1914 was a result of Liberals' failures'

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 2 people
0.0(0)
call with kaiCall with Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/3

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 7:54 PM on 1/28/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

4 Terms

1
New cards

P1 - Success of Cons

  • Conservatives were ably led by Salisbury in this period, capitalising on support for empire and a new brand of ‘villa conservatism

  • Strongly organised & effective in party campaigning through help of Chief Whip & agent Akers Douglas & Captain Middleton & Primrose League → 30 Cons agent in LDN VS 3 Liberals

  • WC Vote due to Jingoism, deference paternalism, Boer war

  • However -

  • Cons divided over tariffs whereas Liberals were consistently united over the issue of free trade leading to their landslide election success in 1906 (400 seats)

2
New cards

P2 - Liberal weaknesses

  • Division over HR 1886 → Formation of Liberal Unionists led by Chamberlain & Hartington, loss of LUs undermined Liberals in elections of 1895 and 1902

  • Gladstone remained a divisive figure until retirement in 1894; some criticised his obsession with HR, whereas others retained unwavering loyalty to ‘grand old man’. → Little achieved between 1892-1895 contributing to the 1895 election defeat

  • Divisions between ‘traditional’ laissez-faire liberals & the emerging group of ‘New Liberals’. → New liberalism gained strength through 1890s & 1900s, but still met with scepticism within the party, even after 1906

  • Rosebery led group of ‘Liberal Imperialists’ in the 1880s, but opposed by others who were sceptical of further imperial expansion.

  • Tensions deepened over issue of the Boer War, which impacted Liberals’ performance in ‘khaki election’ of 1900

  • Party was not united over issue of women’s suffrage → Splits gave impression of disunity from 1906-1914 & caused govts significant unease in handling increasingly militant Suffragette threat.

  • However -

  • Did unite in 1892 election (272) over Newcastle Programme 1891 with 80 more seats than in 1886 , Salisbury lost majority with 314 seats

  • Enjoyed continuous support of the INP 80 MPs, which was particularly significant in 2 elections of 1910

3
New cards

P3 - Growth of Labour

  • Liberals losing the backing of TUs in period as WC turned increasingly towards more proletarian-based political party

  • However -

  • Liberals remained united in opposition to entrenched privilege, eg. challenge to HOL in 1910/11, which contributed to 2 election victories in 1910, and & support for non-conformist opposition to 1902 Education Act which contributed to their 1906 victory

4
New cards

Conclusion