Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
4th amendment
prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures
Katz v. U.S. Significance
Application of the 4th amendment
Oliver v. U.S. significance
Open fields doctrine
Burdeau v. McDowell significance
Private Searches
California v. Greenwood signficance
Abandoned property
Aguilar v. Texas significance
Two- pronged Probable Cause Standard
Spinelli v. U.S. significance
Probable cause standard & expanded on Aguilar requirements
Illinois v. Gates significance
Totality of Circumstances
Franks v. Delaware significance
Affidavit Deception
Weeks v. U.S. significance
Exclusionary rule
Mapp v. Ohio significance
Selective incorporation of exclusionary rule
Hill v. California significance
Honest Mistake Exception
U.S. v. Leon
Good Faith Exception
Exceptions to exclusionary rule
Honest Mistake Exception
Good Faith Exception
Good Faith exception Rlies on
Search or Arrest Warrant
Wong Sun v. U.S. significance
Attenuation Doctrine
Nix v. Williams significance
Inevitable Discovery Doctrine
Murray v. U.S. significance
Independent Source Doctrine
Influence decision to get a search warrant
Tainted information must not be in affidavit
Wilson v. Arkansas significance
Knock and Announce Exceptions
Exemptions of the 4th amendment
noncriminal proceedings
no standing
private searches
Burdeau v. McDowell
open fields doctrine
Hester v. U.S.
Oliver v U.S.
abandoned property
special governmental needs (“Administrative Justification”)
Open Fields Doctrine relies on
P - proximaty
E - enclosure
N - nature of uses
S - steps you’ve taken to keep it private
4th amendment application ( Katz v. U.S.)
Subjective expectation of privacy
You have the expectation of privacy
Objective societal acceptance
Society accepts your expectation as reasonable
Curtilage
area surrounding your home/dwelling where a series of evaluations where you expect privacy & where society accepts your expectation
Due Process types
substantive
creation of law/ implementation
procedural
evidence based, rules of evidence
Burden of Proof (state of prosecution) relies on
Production
Inculpatory ( defense) evidence
“Prima facie”
Persuasion “ standard”
Beyond a reasonable doubt
Prima Facie translates to
On it’s face
Exculpatory Evidence
tends to establish ones innocence
Rules of admissibility
competent
“lawfully seized” survives
Pretrial motion to suppress/ suppression
relevant - Motion in Limine
material - Motion in Limine
Motion in limine is
irrelevant
immaterial
unreliable
unfairly prejudicial - greater than probative value
cumulative
corroborative
contradictory
Most common in “pre-trial”
Motion in Limine “At the Threshold”
4th amendment clause
Reasonableness (i.e.; privacy )
persons, houses, papers, effects
Warrant clause
probable cause
oath ( rebuttable presumption )
Particularity requirement (automobile searches)
“Franks hearing”
Happens when you convince a judge through a motion that you have reasonable evidence that the police did
False information ( intentionally)
Reckless disregard for the truth
Remove
Evidence doesn’t get suppressed but judge reevaluates affidavit to see if probable cause would still have been found
types of evidence
Real
Physical
Demonstrative
Testimonial
words uttered in court under oath
Nature
Direct
Circumstantial
Direct evidence
evidence based on a witness’s personal knowledge of that fact acquired by the means of the witness senses
Circumstantial evidence
Conclusions made by the court
Utility of circumstantial evidence
ability
did they do they
intent
consciousness of guilt
character
victim involvement
Proferred
When evidence is submitted to the court
Types of physical evidence
evidence of a crime
ex. blood
fruits of crime
ex. money
instrumentalities of crime
ex. gun
contraband
ex. drugs
Derivative Evidence Rule
Also know as “Fruits of a poisonous tree Doctrine”
Richards v Wilson Exceptions
Evanescent evidence
Evidence which is easily destroyed or concealed
Danger
Gesture ( useless)
Escapee
Purpose of Knock and Announce Rule
Castle doctrine
Exceptions to Good Faith Exception
“Franks” Hearing Dilemma
Judge/ Magistrate abandons “Neutrality”
Officer reasonably sees no probable cause
Officer reasonably sees no specificity
warrant is too vague with what you can search
Elkins v. U.S. significance
Silver Platter Doctrine
Burden of Persuasion
Beyond a reasonable doubt/ moral certainty (proffers inculpatory evidence)
Directed Verdict of acquittal
id the state has not proffered sufficient evidence that could not reasonably persuade a judge/ jury
Motion to Suppress
Incompetent evidence
evidence excluded by rules of evidence
deals with unlawfully seized evidence
Wolf v. Colorado
selectively incorporated the 4th amendment ( now applicable to the states)
Basis of Knowledge
provide some factual knowledge/ “underlying circumstances” to the neutral magistrate for how the information was gathered from the informant/ someone else
Veracity prong
based on a credible source with reliable information
How was Aguilar- Spinelli 2-pronged test viewed
Hyper technical and rigid
Totality of Circumstances Evaluation Guidelines
common sense
Practical question
Purpose of Exclusionary rule
to deter police misconduct ( or more broadly, governmental abuse)
Two prong test
Basis of Knowledge ( credible person issue)
Reliability test ( veracity and corroborated)