1/16
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
How well did the European Central Bank’s Monetary Policy Perform?
Supporters
Critics
How it couldve been prevented
Good - kept inflation stable and clsoe to target level, reputation of competence but caution
Critics (e.g. de Grauwe) ECB failed to control growth of bank credit and price bubbles.
Property Bubbles as credit too cheap, Banks offered risky mortagaes, banks had a lot of money to lend
Could differentiated banks reserves to maintain.
One size fits all: Economic conditions between countries varied, with MU would set diff IR.
What is the Taylor Rule
Example of how this shoudlve been used (but wasn’t)
Taylor Rule: formula to find out optimal IR based on macroecon data.
Desired interest rate as a function of: Weighted output gap | Weighted inflation deviation | Target inflation rate | Long-term interest rate.
2002 Germany desired IR was 2.75%, Ireland’s was 7.5% (Irealands economy was overheating). Actual rate was 3.25% until December.
What caused the 2008 Recession?
2007 - failings in world financial systems - US subprime mortgages defaults and securitised loans spread across continents.
Dec 2007 - US Recession
Sep 2008 - Lehman Bank failure, fears of total collapse of banking system.
What were the immediate impacts of the 2008 recession.
Demand fell quick, unsold stocks increased.
Output down 4% 2009, Unemployment rose 7.2 → 10%, mid 2009 deflation.
How did the ECB respond to the Crisis and Aftermath.
List 4 ways explain 2.
Cut IR - Trichet cut 4.75% to 1%, Draghi more cuts Nov 2011 onwards 0.05%.
June 2014 - standing overnight IR negative to increase bank lending.
Cut banks’ reserve ratios.
Boost banks’ liquidity - inter-bank lending dried up due to fears of bank solvencies, 2001 weekly tenders, fixed 1% IR unlimited amout.
Draghi 3 year refinancing - 1 tril, euro at 0.75%.
Draghi accepted lower grade bonds as collateral (as long as banks have collateral they can access liquidity)
Bought weak gov. bonds.
New European Systemic Risk Board: Dec 2010 ‘macro-prudential oversight’ monitoring risks and advising actions. Prevent another crisis. Independent but no binding power.
How did buying weak gov. bonds (SMP) help the ECB after the recession.
Worries about nation solvency / eurozone breakup after 2008 caused some national bond prices to fall (and rise in those countires longer term interest rates), this undermined a single monetary policy (e.g. Spanish firsm borrowing at a higher IR than German)
Trichet ‘Securities Marketing Programme’
ECB and nation CBs buy problem bonds from com. banks (steralise the effect on mone supply) but didnt work: interest gaps continued to widen.
What is the ‘Outright Monetary Transactions’
How it worked
ECB refrained from QE. Strongly opposed in GER - mutalisation of debt.
2012 Draghi do whatever it takes to save Euro. → OMT annoucned:
OMT - buy government debt in secondary markets, massive firepower. (Never actually implimented)
IR on SPA/ITA bonds fell sharply. BUT Eurozone crisis continued - stagflation and Inflation rates falling below target.
Arguements for fiscal policy rules in an MU
National borrowing on capital marktets increases interest rates for all. Increases cost to other countries of servicing their gov.debt.
Borrowers might but pressure on ECB to lower interest rates.
Conserns over consequences if a country were to default (gov cant fund interest on nation debt).
Maastricht Treaty includes a ‘no-bail-out’ clause - others no required to help. Unrealistic though as gov bonds are widely held in the EZ - default would damage the whole financial system
Hence aid to Greece, Ireland, Portugal.
Arguments against fiscal policy rules in a MU
Economies in MU may differ so need national control of tax (can’t use MP)
BUT could be differentated but co-ordinated across the MU
Capital markets will attach risk premium on lending to debt-burden country = curbs excess borrowing and risk.
BUT premium will be lower if markets believe others will bail them out.
How were national budget deficits controlled before and after crisis.
Before: Stability and Growth Pact: agreed 1997 pre-MU. SGP reformed 2005
After: Six-pack plan 2011: Medium term budgetary balance and Current budgetary balance.
What did the SGP involve before crisis
SGP - Stability and Growth Pact
A) Medium term budgetary balance (preventative arm - meant difference between gov spending and income) aimed to eliminate budget deficit over the years, in a downturn fiscal pol. could be eased without a crisis.
Most EU countries failed pre 2007.
B) Excessive deficit procedure (EDP), in excess if > 3% GDP. Monitored by a commission which proposed actions to the council. If council agreed the deficit was excesive country had 10 months the act (e.g. cut by 0.5%/year) if not sanctions.
What happened to / within the SGP pre-crisis (2003, 2005, 2006)
2003 - Crisis, small countries made to take action (Portugal) but big countries refuse and say EDP rules too strict (France)
2005 - reform - made SGP more flexible and added Merdium Term Objective for budget balance.
2006 - widespread deficits: 12 more countries subject to EDP.
How did the Crisis impact Gov finances and why
Why?
Massive increase in spending to try offset recession | Cost of rescuing banks.
By 2010 -
budget deteriorated by 5% points.
Budget deficits averaged 6%
2012
23/27 countries subject to EDP - had to suspend SGP requirments.
How did the EU control national budget deficits post-crisis
Six pack
European Semester
Fiscal Compact (TReaty)
What was the six pact policy
2nd reform of the SGP - correct inability to prevent build-upp of fiscal imbalances.
Enforcment of rules stricter. ‘Reverse Qualified Majority’ new voting system for sanctions - Commision proposals adopoted unless majoirty of Council votes against them.
Extra EDP - if debt >60% GDP, reduce by 5%/year for 3 years.
Stricter fiscal rules - ‘expenditure benchmark’ defined - cap on annual growth of public expenditure accoriding the a medium-term rate of growth.
More reporting requirments,
What is the European Semester 2011
Coordination and Surveillance.
Jan-July national policies reviewed before enacted.
Structural Reforms: MS present SR as part of National Reform Programes.
Budgetary Surveillance: national Stabilit and Convergence Programmes in framework of strengthened SGP, member state submit detailed budget plans.
Macro-Econ imbalances surveillance
Rigorous enforcment via interest-bearing fines.
What was the 2013 'Fiscal Compact’
A) Treaty Obligation: balanced budget rule for medium term: budget deficit must not exceed 0.5% GDP (1% if total debt below 60% GDP)
Auto sancations of 0.1% GDP (need a qualified majority in council to reject)
National debt >60% GDP must be cut by 1/20th of excess yearly. Applies to all Eurozone members.