PSYC 105: L7 Intro to Language Flashcards

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/20

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

21 Terms

1
New cards

What does the Bee Waggle Dance and the Vervet Monkey Calls show us?

Animal communication; that even though animals don’t have speech, they have a means of communication. For bees, they communicate the location of a food source by the direction, length, and frequency of the buzzing. For monkeys, it means that the kind of noises they make are important for identifying dangers.

2
New cards

Def Hierarchical Organization of Language and name the -omes from smallest to largest

The hierarchical organization of language refers to how language is structured in small to large building blocks.

Phonemes

Morphemes

Lexicon

Syntax

Semantics

Pragmatics

3
New cards

Phoneme

Smallest unit of sound; phonology = how sounds are used to make up words

dog —> duh - uh - og

4
New cards

Morpheme

Smallest unit of meaning; Morphology = How morphemes are combined to make up words

5
New cards

Lexicon

Representations of words, mental dictionary of all the information we know about a word

6
New cards

Syntax

Rules governing how words are combined to form sentences (grammar)

7
New cards

Semantics

Literal meaning of words and sentences

8
New cards

Pragmatics

Meaning in context

9
New cards

Name and define 5 of Hockett’s design features of human language.

Arbitrariness = Abstract symbols determined by convention; no inherent relation between sounds and meanings (dog, cat, bed, etc)

Displacement = The ability to talk about things and ideas not in the here and now.

Duality of Patterning = Combinations of otherwise meaningless units that are meaningful.

Productivity = Speakers can create novel utterances they have never heard before - can create an infinite set of meanings with a finite set of units.

Reflexiveness = Can use the language to talk about the language itself.

10
New cards

Recursion

Embedding structures within structures; hierarchical and potentially infinite.

<p>Embedding structures within structures; hierarchical and potentially infinite.</p>
11
New cards

Def Nativism/Nature (and give 2 pieces of evidence) vs Behaviorism/Nurture

Nativism/Nature = The theory that humans are biologically predisposed to acquire language. (Chomsky example)

  • Language Acquisition Device —> general rules and constraints ingrained in all humans

  • Poverty Stimulus —> children can produce novel structures + can learn based on limited + imperfect input

    Nurture/Behaviorism = The view that language is just like any other animal behavior, shaped by conditioning through repetition and reinforcement.

12
New cards

What are two examples of evidence for nativism?

Animals have some successes with word learning, but not with grammar. Some evidence that some animals can comprehend the implications of word orders, but there is no
strong evidence that they can produce complex grammatical structures. (Nim Chimpsky, Koko the gorilla, Kanzi the bonobo)

Human children pick up grammar rapidly and without explicit instruction.

13
New cards

What is the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis?

The structure of a language determines a native speaker's perception and categorization of experience.

  • Linguistic Determinism = Language limits or determines thought (stronger version).

  • Linguistic Relativity = Language affects thought and behavior (milder version).


An even milder version (most likely to be true): Language affects processing on certain tasks where linguistic encoding is important.

14
New cards

Linguistic Relativity

Language affects thought and behavior (milder version).

Experience shapes thought

  • Language may be part of that experience, but it is not the only determinant of cognition (indirect)

    Instead of determining thought, effects of language are perhaps better described as:

  • Expertise in categorization

  • Increased attention

  • Limits to expression

15
New cards

Codability

Higher agreeability on labels, usually shorter in length, easier for speakers to come up with.

16
New cards

What did the '“Russian Blue Study,” show us?

Categorical Perception = The perception of distinct categories when there is a gradual change in a continuum.

  • Distinguishing within-category items is harder and takes longer
    than distinguishing between-category items

  • Russian speakers might have a stronger mental categorization for different blues.

  • Conceptualizing/categorizing the world in a certain way might be easier if your language has words for those distinctions.

17
New cards

Name 3 characteristics of the Bee Dance vs Human Communication

knowt flashcard image
18
New cards

What are some similarities and challenges with language + thought?

Similarities = they are both thought of as our “inner voice”

Challenges =

  • People have thoughts we can’t articulate

  • Pre-verbal infants + animals are capable of thinking without language

  • Adults without language still have thoughts

19
New cards

What does the example of snow show us?

Vocabulary differences are unlikely to have significant difference on perception.


They reflect differences in experience and expertise.

20
New cards

What does grammatical gender show us?

Grammatical gender may focus speakers of different languages on different aspects of objects.

Ex.=

  • Spanish and German speakers were asked to write down the first 3 English adjectives that came to mind for objects with opposite grammatical genders in the 2 languages
    • “Key” (Masc. in German, Fem. In Spanish)
    German: hard, heavy, jagged, metal, serrated
    Spanish: golden, intricate, little, lovely, shiny

    Grammatical gender affects performance on some tasks that use language.

21
New cards

What is an example of spatial representation of time between the English and mandarin language?

English and Mandarin both have front/back horizontal time metaphors (looking forward to the future, looking back on the past)

  • Mandarin frequently uses vertical metaphors as well
    (e.g., 上“up” for earlier events and 下 “down” for later events)

  • Both groups showed left-to-right representation of time

  • Only the Mandarin group showed top-to-bottom representation of time

    Linguistic metaphors guide spatial representation of time.