1/17
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
what is behaviourism? - B.F Skinner
children learn language through imitation and operant learning
Operant conditioning shapes behaviour
behaviourism - arguments in favour
children tend to pick up colloquialisms
During school life, their use of language will become more accurate, and more complex bc of teachers
Aspects of language like accents r learned
behaviourism - arguments against
children produce novel sentences they haven’t heard
Overgeneralisation errors (e.g. runned) not explained by imitation
Doesn’t explain innate ability
what is nativism - chompsky
LAD language acquisition device is innate
Universal grammar : all languages share a common structure
nativism - arguments for
children acquire language effortlessly and rapidly
Similar stages of development across languages
Can understand grammar beyond what they hear
nativism - arguments against
Underestimates the role of social interaction
No physical evidence of LAD
Ignores variation in development due to environment
what is social interactionism?
Bruner and Vygotsky
Language develops through social interaction
Importance of caregivers and scaffolding
Language is part of cognitive development
social interactionism - arguments against
may overemphasis social input
Doesn’t fully explain how grammar is acquired
Some children learn language with limited interaction
Vygotsky's theory of proximal development
emphasised that children need a more knowledgeable other to develop their knowledge and skills.
scaffolding Bruner
caregivers provide the same kind of support for children. They provide support (referred to as the 'Language Acquisition Support System' (LASS) and this is gradually removed as the child learns and develops by themselves.
genie case study
shows how a lack of interaction in early life negatively affects language learning. Genie was kept locked in a room and deprived of contact for her first 13 years of life. This early stage is believed to be the critical period of language acquisition
cognitive learning theory
language learning is closely linked to the maturation and development of the human brain.
Children must understand concepts before learning words (e.g. object permanence)
Arguments in favour - cognitive
links between stages of cognitive and linguistic development
Concept acquisition influences vocabulary growth
Arguments against - cognitive
children can learn words before fully understanding the concept
Underestimates language as a driver of cognition
Jim - case study
Jim was a hearing child who had deaf parents that used sign language
He had minimal spoken interaction until later
His language was delayed
Jim - relevance to theories
challenges behaviourism and nativism
Supports social interactionism , without interaction, language development was hindered
Genie - case study
severely neglected and isolated with no language exposure
After rescue, learned some words but struggled with grammar
Genie - relevance to theories
supports critical period hypothesis (nativism)
Shows language input and timings are crucial
Challenged idea of purely innate mechanisms (Chomsky)