Neisser and Harsch (1992) - Study | Psychology

studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
learn
LearnA personalized and smart learning plan
exam
Practice TestTake a test on your terms and definitions
spaced repetition
Spaced RepetitionScientifically backed study method
heart puzzle
Matching GameHow quick can you match all your cards?
flashcards
FlashcardsStudy terms and definitions

1 / 9

10 Terms

1

IB Questions

  • Reliability of Cognitive Processing - Reconstructive Memory

  • Emotion on Cognition

New cards
2

Name of the Researcher(s)

Neisser and Harsch

New cards
3

Publication

1992

New cards
4

Aim

To investigate if flashbulb memories (FBMs) are prone to distortion.

New cards
5

Method

Case Study (Survey and Interview)

New cards
6

Procedure and Participants

Participants - 106 University Students

  1. Participants were given a questionnaire about their experience of witnessing the Challenger Disaster in less than 24 hours after the event.

  2. 2.5 years later they were given the exact same questionnaire and also asked how confident they were in their answers being the same from the first questionnaire.

New cards
7

Results

There were discrepancies in the participants answers which resulted in the researchers following up with a semi-structured interview to direct them into answering their original answers.

New cards
8

Conclusion

FBMs are prone to distortion, however we are confident we are correct nonetheless.

New cards
9

Strengths

+ Method Triangulation —> Reliability
+ Prospective
+ Longitudinal
+ High Ecological Validity

New cards
10

Limitations

- Not Precisely Replicable
- Participant Attrition
- Naturalistic
- Retrospective

New cards
robot