Neisser and Harsch (1992) - Study | Psychology

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/9

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

10 Terms

1
New cards

IB Questions

  • Reliability of Cognitive Processing - Reconstructive Memory

  • Emotion on Cognition

2
New cards

Name of the Researcher(s)

Neisser and Harsch

3
New cards

Publication

1992

4
New cards

Aim

To investigate if flashbulb memories (FBMs) are prone to distortion.

5
New cards

Method

Case Study (Survey and Interview)

6
New cards

Procedure and Participants

Participants - 106 University Students

  1. Participants were given a questionnaire about their experience of witnessing the Challenger Disaster in less than 24 hours after the event.

  2. 2.5 years later they were given the exact same questionnaire and also asked how confident they were in their answers being the same from the first questionnaire.

7
New cards

Results

There were discrepancies in the participants answers which resulted in the researchers following up with a semi-structured interview to direct them into answering their original answers.

8
New cards

Conclusion

FBMs are prone to distortion, however we are confident we are correct nonetheless.

9
New cards

Strengths

+ Method Triangulation —> Reliability
+ Prospective
+ Longitudinal
+ High Ecological Validity

10
New cards

Limitations

- Not Precisely Replicable
- Participant Attrition
- Naturalistic
- Retrospective