1/16
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Argument
valid if all its premises are true implies that the conclusion is true. Otherwise, invalid.
Fallacy
An error in reasoning that leads to an invalid argument.
Law of Detachment, Law of Contraposition, Law of Disjunctive Syllogism, Law of Hypothetical Syllogism
Common Forms of Valid Arguments
Fallacy of the converse, Fallacy of the inverse, Fallacy of the inclusive or
Common Forms of Invalid Arguments
Reasoning
the process of drawing conclusion or inferences through the use of proper justification.
Inductive Reasoning
the process of reasoning that arrives at a general conclusion based on the observation of specific examples.
Specimen
An object defined by a premise
Conjecture
The generalization
Counterexample
A specimen that negates the conjecture
Deductive reasoning
the process of reasoning that arrives at a conclusion based on previously accepted general statements.
Axioms
assume basic true statements
Theorems
derive true statements from the axioms
Valid
if its conclusion follows from its premises, regardless of the truth of the premises or conclusion. (deductive)
Sound
if it is valid and its premises are all true. deductive)
George Polya
Hungarian mathematician who devised a model for problem solving and published it in his book How to Solve It.
Heuristic
(or serving to discover), George Polya problem solving model