1/57
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Stress
The physiological and psychological response that a person experiences when confronted with a situation that is threatening or challenging.
Is stress a mental disorder?
Stress is not considered a mental order by itself.
Selye’s definition of Stress
Stress is the non-specific response of the body to any demand for change
Types of Stress Scientist
Selye 1936
Types of Stress (Selye 1936)
Selye states that stress isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but our bodies’ reaction to it can be. Our cognitive appraisal of experiences leads to different types of stress.
Types of stress
Distress
Eustress
Distress
Negative stress that results from being overwhelmed by demands, losses or perceived threats. Caused by negative cognitive appraisals. Negatively affects you, taking away energy.
Eustress
Positive stress that results from challenging but attainable and enjoyable worthwhile tasks. Caused by positive cognitive appraisals. Has a positive effect on you, giving you energy.
Stressors
Stimuli that place demands on a person, requiring them to adapt their behaviour in some way. May even threaten our well being and physical safety.
Stressors can vary by…
Types and Characteristics
Types of stressors
Environmental Stressors
Psychological Stressors
Social Stressors
Cultural Stressors
Environmental Stressors
Aspects of our surroundings that induces stress in our lives
Examples of Environmental stressors
Noise, temperatures, natural disaster, school work, exam room etc.
Psychological Stressors
Aspects of our mental state that induce stress in our lives
Examples of Psychological Stressors
Unrealistic expectations, perfectionism, low self esteem, phobias
Social Stressors
Aspects of our relationships with others that increase stress in our lives
Examples of Social Stressors
Familial problems, relationship troubles, social isolation, interpersonal conflict
Cultural Stressors
Aspects of our family background and beliefs that increase stress in our lives.
Examples of Cultural Stressors
Pressures to conform, discrimination, prejudice
Characteristics of Stressors
Nature
Duration
Strength
Nature
Whether the stress has a positive or negative effect on our body based on our perception. The nature of a stressor could be positive or negative.
Duration
The length of time the stressor affects a person. A stressor can be over quickly or can act on you for a long time.
Strength
The impact a stressor has on a person. Low levels of stress may not illicit any response to current situations, too much may lead to a meltdown. Your body needs just the right amount of stress to perform optimally.
Health Related Consequences of Stress
Stress causes a variety of health effects within the body. It can lead to physical symptoms, both long and short term.
Short term Health Effects of Stress
Higher heart rate/ breathing rate
Increased muscle tone
Digestive issues
Anxious
Long term Health Effects of Stress
Increased chance of heart attack and stroke
Increased risk of type 2 diabetes
Mental health problems
Fertility issues. Sexual dysfunction
Types of coping strategies
Maladaptive coping strategies
Adaptive coping strategies
Maladaptive coping strategies
Methods a person uses to reduce their stress or anxiety but in an ineffective, unhealthy way. Eg. Procrastination, masking, gambling etc.
Adaptive coping strategies
Methods used to reduce stress that have positive effects on a person’s health and help build emotional resiliency. Eg. Exercise, meditation, venting, sleep etc.
Scientist behind the General Adaptation Syndrome model
Selye (1936/1983)
General Adaptation Syndrome (GAS) Model
Describes how our body automatically responds to stress over time in a predictable way.
Selye’s Findings with the GAS model
Regardless of the type of stress on the body, we often experience similar long+short term effects. Our body goes through a number of physiological changes when stressed.
Three stages of the GAS model
Alarm
Resistance
Exhaustion
Alarm
When we first perceive a stressor, our body falls into a state of ‘shock’ where we momentarily feel helpless, weakened, or overwhelmed
Effects of the alarm stage
Body temp and blood pressure drops. Muscles lose tone. Ability to cope w/ stress is reduced. Body rebounds and enters a counter shock state where the sympathetic nervous system kicks in, releases cortisol and adrenaline, increasing breathing and heart rate.
Resistance
Physiological changes stay above average, but at a lowered level than the alarm stage. Increased levels of cortisol, maintain resistance to stressor, but suppress immune system. Body is susceptible to duress and other stressors due to resources used to maintain resistance.
Exhaustion
The body’s resources are drained, cortisol levels depleted. Experience fatigue and susceptible to physical illness and mental health disorders.
Strengths of General Adaptation Syndrome Model
Was the 1st model to highlight the major impacts o n the immune system
Heavily supported by decades of research + empirical evidence
Identifies the biological processes involved in stress
Limitations of the General Adaptation Syndrome Model
Too much emphasis on biology of stress response - no psychological factors
Fails to acknowledge the unique factor of an individual that would impact their response to stress
Researched predominantly on animals so can’t be generalised
Specific stressors activate specific response (in new research), so likely isn’t ’non-specific’
Scientists behind the Social Readjustment Rating Scale
Holmes and Rahe (1967)
Year of the Social Readjustment Rating scale
1967
Social Readjustment Rating Scale
A rating scale designed to identify major stressful life events that in individual experienced in the last year. Based on the premise that the event induce stress due to the significant adjustments they require.
Making the social readjustment Rating Scale
Holmes + Rahe compiled a list of 43 stressful things In life. Each event was awarded a life change unit depending on how traumatic it is to a large sample of participants. Participants tick the events that occurred to them in last year. The score provides the likelihood of a major health breakdown in the next 2 years.
Social Readjustment Rating Scale score indicators
Over 300 means 80% chance of stress-related mental breakdown
150-299 means 50% chance
Less than 150 means 30% chance
Strengths of Social Readjustment Rating Scale
Simple, effective tool for measuring effects of stress on an individual’s health.
Supported empirically
Limitations of Social Readjustment Rating Scale
Individual differences in stress aren’t considered
Scale doesn’t consider common stressors that occur daily
Not objective - participants may lie
Transactional Theory of Stress and Coping Scientists
Lazurus and Folkman (1984)
Year of Transactional theory of stress and coping
1984
Transactional Theory of Stress and COping
Stress is an encounter between an individual and their environment. Results when perceived demands of a situation outweighs a person’s ability to cope with it.
Difference between GAS model and TTSC
TTSC suggests an individual’s stress response is a result of their individual subjective cognitive appraisals of the stressor and their ability to cope with its demands
Cognitive appraisal
An individual’s perception of a stimulus
2 types of appraisals
primary appraisals
Secondary Appraisals
Primary appraisal
Individuals evaluate of judge the significance of a stimulus. They decide whether the stimulus is relevant and whether it will benefit or harm them (Irrelevant, benign-positive, stressful)
Secondary Appraisals
where we evaluate our coping options and resources - what can be done about it. Individuals may have Adequate resources to cope (personal strats etc) or inadequate resources to cope (leads to distress)
Problem-focused coping
Used when we feel we have control of a situation and can manage/ change the situation directly
Emotions-focused coping
Used the change our emotional state when we feel we have little control over the situation
Strengths of the transactional Theory of stress and coping
Accounts for individual differences in stress responses
Built off of human participants
Considers the cognitive component required for stress appraisals
Limitations of the Transactional theory of Stress and coping
Difficult/ unethical to measure experimentally, no empirical evidence
Primary and secondary appraisals influence each other and occur simultaneously
Overemphasises appraisal as an active process - in reality we are just as stressed without the thought
Overlooks physiological responses