1/73
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Addition Polymer
Made from monomers directly combining together; polymer has all the atoms in the monomer
Condensation Polymer
Results when monomers combine such that small molecules are split away
Molecular recognition
Ability of biomolecules to recognize other biomolecules and selectively interact with them in order to promote fundamental biological events
Molecular docking
Involves placing molecules in appropriate configurations to interact with a receptors
In molecular modeling, what is molecular docking
Study of how two or more molecules structures fit together
Importance of molecular recognition
Understand molecular function and biological process
Design novel therapeutic agents
Molecular docking classification of molecules
Small molecules (ligands), proteins, nucleic acid
Types of docking systems
Protein-ligand, protein-protein, nucleic acid-protein
This is the most understood type of docking system
ligand-protein
Typical applications of molecular docking
Virtual screening
Lead hopping
Increasing HTS hit rates
Lock and Key theory
A susbtrate fits into the active site of a macromolecule
Induced-Fit Theory
Ligand and target mutually adapt to each other through small conformational changes for optimal fit
Conformation Ensemble model
Pre-existing ensemble of conformational states that a protein has, switching from one state to another
Computational docking
predicts the optimal binding orientation and conformation of interacting molecules in space and to extimate the stability of their complex
What does molecular docking predict
Whether two molecules interact or not, the binding affinity, and 3D structure of the complex
Shape complementarty
Primary criterion for evaluating the fit in the computational docking of two candidate structures
Other criteria for molecular docking
Chemical and physicochemical complementarity
How does energy dictate molecular associations
The complex that has a lower potential energy is the preferred configuration
Category of Docking software
Molecular representation, Scoring method, Seraching algorithm
Molecular representation
Way to represent structures and properties
Scoring method
Assess the quality of docked complexes
Search algorithm
Decides which poses to generate
How is ligand prepared
Removing any counter ion, slats, or water molecules, all reactive and undesirable compounds
What should be generated for a ligand
All optical isomers, cis/trans isomers, tautomers, and protonation states of the structure
Factors leading to the formation of ligand-receptor complex
The interaction energies between two molecules
The desolvation and solvation energies associated with the interacting molecules
The entropic factors that occur upon binding
Force-Field Calculation
The energies obtained by force field methods can be used directly to approximate free energies of binding
Feature based matching
Matches local complementarity features among molecuels involved in the recognition
Stepwise search
Explores the “search space” guided by a scoring fucntion
Autodock Vina
Docking program based on a simple scoring funnction and rapid conformational search
Autodock
Docking program based on free-energy force field and rapid genetic algorithm search methodR
accoon
Interactive tool for virtual screening and analysis
AutoDockTools
Interactive GUI for coordinate prep, docking and analysis
AutoLigand
Program that predicts optimal sites of ligand binding on receptors
Assumptions in the Experiment
Conformational space is reduced due to a rigid receptor and fixed bond angels and lengths in the ligand. NO INDUCED FIT BINDING
A simplified scoring function based on empirical free energies of binding is used to score poses for each conformation search
Ordered water molecules mediate interactions between ligands and receptors
Methods for Handling Ligand Flexibility
Ligand-ensemble docking method
Fragmentation Method
Stochastic conformational search method
Ligand-Ensemble Docking Method
Low energy conformers are generated by conformational analysis
Rigid docking is applied for each conformer to find the most favorable small molecule protein complex
Two approached to Fragmentation Docking Method
Place-and-hoin and Incremental
Place-and-join
Splitting into subparts then assess the reconnection based on their relative locatin
Incremental
Initial core is docking and new fragments are progressively added until the structure is complete
Stochastic Search Method
Modifying the conformation in the receptor site and optimizing it directly
Types of Protein Flexibility
Smal atom flucturations
Side-chain flexibility
Backbone flexibility
Domain movements
Soft docking method
Allows slight penetrations between the receptor and the ligan molecules, allowing for overlap
Soft scoring effect
Increase the chances of not overlooking good solutions
Energetics of soft scoring
When calculated with force fields, steroic clashes correspond to high energies
Side Chain Flexibility enables
Maximazation of favorable interactions with the protein
What is the most complex and time consuming types of flexibility
Backbone and side chain flexibility
Multiple Protein Search approach
Use of multiple structures of the target protein as obtained from experiimental methods or theoretical simulations
Three mechanisms of domain movements
Intrinsic flexibility, hinged domain, ball and socket
Intrinsic flexibility
Large motion of domain
Hinged domain
Small rotation, involved small number of residues
Ball-and-socket
Combination of hinge and shear motions
GUI
streamlines docking workflows with automated server connections and ligand library management. It supports multiple receptor targets with flexible residues and provides an intuitive setup for docking parameters. Results are automatically retrieved, processed, and filtered based on key properties and interactions. Users can efficiently analyze and export refined virtual screening results, making the process seamless and user-friendly.
AutoDock is designed to solve this
Docking os small, drug-like molecuels to biological macromolecules of known structure
Approach for docking very large ligands with too many degrees of freedom
Fragmentation method
Best way to determine the simulation and search the avialbele conformation space
Clustering analysis
Virtual Screening with Raccoon Use
Docking and ranking of hundred of compounds to a macromolecular target
Limitations of X-ray crystallography
Needs crystals, hard for protein
Resolution problems, loops, side chains, tautomeric state
Ambiguous in bound ligands
NMR limitations
Mass restricting (only 64KDa)
Poor resolution power
Sensitivity loss and increased spectral complexity
Threading approach
Aligns the target protein sequence to known protein folds in the structural database assuming similar sequences will adopt to similar 3D conformationsT
Use of Threading Approach
When homologous structures are unavailable
Ab-Initio Method
Involved force fields, molecular dynamics simulations, and energy minimization techniques to explore possible conformation
Ab-Initio Method use
No protein template is available
Homology Modeling
Builds 3D structure based on similarity to known protein structure (template)
What type of modelling approach does MODELLER has
Homology
How does MODELLER work
Template acts as guide to build new model ]
Optimization function runs to minimize restraints then constructs model
Software for Molecular Dynamics analysis
NAMD/VMD, GROMACS, AMBER
Molecualr Dynamics use
5ns run for removing molecular clashses and 20 ns for loop refinement
Swiss Strcture Assessment
Analysis via Ramachandran plot
SAVES programs
ProVE, Verify3D, Whatcheck, Procheck, ERRAT
ProVE
Calcilates componetns on solvent-exculeded volume of protein (van der Walls and void volume)
Verify3D
Checks the model structure on 3D profile
Whatcheck
Checks sterochemical quality (Z score and RMS-Z)
Procheck
Normality of geometry of the residues in a given protein structure
ERRAT
Verifies protein structure based on pattern of nonboneded or randomized atomic interactions